User talk:PaulWay

Welcome to Wikipedia
Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and stick around. If you want, you can drop us a note at New user log to introduce yourself.

Before you start doing a lot of editing, you might want to take the Tutorial. It gives a lot of basic info you'll want to get you oriented on Wikipedia.

You can sign your name on talk pages by using three tildes ( " ") for your username and four (" ~ ") for your username and a timestamp.

If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Help desk. You can also drop me a question on my talk page.

Happy editing, --Martyman- (talk) 02:37, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

I have reverted your addition of the IQ test info to the Canberra article. The article recently became a Featured article and needs to now be held to a higher standard than a normal wikipedia article. I felt your addition did not fit well with wikipedia's policy of Neutral Point of View and would need to be properly attributed and referenced before even considering it to the article. Also I notice you may have accidently created your user page at User::PaulWay instead of User:PaulWay you should be able to use the move page function to move the page to the correct location. Let me knwo if you have any questions. --Martyman- (talk) 02:37, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi Paul, I just realised I know you via mythtv. Let me knwo if I can help out with anything around wikipedia. --Martyman- (talk) 02:44, 28 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi Martyman! I did throw that IQ test in as a minor thing, so I'm not surprised in retrospect that it should not make the grade.  I'm not necessarily boasting, as I'm originally a Brisbanite, but I thought it was relevant in the context that the population of the ACT and Canberra has a high proportion of well-trained, well-educated white collar workers.  Give me a call or email if you're wanting to talk MythTV!.  -- PaulWay- (talk) 10:34PM 29 November 2005 (AEDST)


 * I agree that it is an interesting statistic and if it could be represented in a more scientific way should be in the article. Unfortunatly I am not sure the test in question was anywhere near scientific enough to make the grade. People also tend to get jumpy when you start making allegations about group IQ levels. ;-) --Martyman- (talk) 11:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)