User talk:Paul Janik

Done

Material removed from Slough Independents
I've removed your updates of 20 May 2007 from the Slough Independents article. Please see Talk:Slough Independents for the rationale - in fairness I felt I should draw it to your attention. Grblundell 09:17, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Pauljanik.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Pauljanik.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Geolocation software, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 20:39, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of PPPILA for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PPPILA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PPPILA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. doktorb wordsdeeds 08:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)