User talk:Paul Manion

Your submission at Articles for creation: Time Ratio (May 28)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Time_Ratio Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is not for posting your own ideas

KylieTastic (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello KylieTastic,
 * Thank you for your comment. I must stress here, that if you read my article carefully, you will find it will need some thought and careful reading. My concept is not an idea of time but the reality of time. Nowadays we look at time in relation to matter and real objects, how time is a unit or measurement of such objects. For example weighing gravity, finding out the speed or acceleration of a body. Time has never began nor will it end, we accept it is and take it for granted. Time has existed long before the big bang and it will always be there as long as the universe is expanding. If you carefully apply time to Newtons Equation F=ma to find the value of time squared= Di/dt squared, you can see that time is a constant and is measure against an object given force and acceleration. That is one example there are many more. Such as the force of gravity of an object which only has an affect on matter and its reaction. If the universe did not come into existence, time would still be there.
 * If you have any questions regarding my concept of time feel free to leave me a message.
 * I am in the process of writing a book, when I publish it, take a look at it. But for now if you doubt my opinion I will answer all questions you have about time. We do consider the property of time as a constant which brings results to moving objects.
 * I must point out that I have looked at this for forty years. I have a PHD in electronics and a filed patent.
 * Paul Manion Paul Manion (talk) 01:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The article does not mention creation Paul Manion (talk) 01:24, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

The Concept of Time
Imagine space and the universe completely empty with that I mean, nothing everywhere just a complete vacuum everywhere, no planets no light, no darkness, no matter, no radiation, no cosmos and no universe, just complete emptiness. If one were to look up to the sky today all there would be is the cosmos and quite often we ask ourselves how did it all start? Here are my thoughts on the subject. Take two points of equal entities, at any gap to each other, say about a millimeter between them, the gap could be much more than that or much less than a millimeter. The gap at point 1 to 2 has a spherical distance, and if you had to measure the distance at these two points they may be larger or smaller than a millimeter apart, whatever the distance may be they still are two identical entities. Should the distance between these two points be measured at their moment in time, there will be no time difference, due to the fact that they are completely static where they are and they will be identical in time. That is to say the two instantaneous points in time are the same in everyway. For example if I were to stop someone on the street and ask them the time, the time at that instant would be the same time for myself and the other person, no matter how far I am from that person. Time dilation is irrelevant in this case as there is no velocity between the two points, they are static. Therefore (t ) time equals (t) is squared, when time is zero. Time (t). is 1 at a distance to point 2 in a shyer when point 1 and 2 are related at a reference point. The distance between point 1 and 2 become (t) squared where the area of the two points at any one time equal one radii, i.e. the area of the shyer  multiplied by itself  is measured by a ratio of (t)1 the radius and circumference (t)2 of the sphere. If you were to add on a further point say point (t)3 you will then introduce a second outer shyer in relation to the inner shyer to make the radius of point (t)1 to (t)2  and make a larger distance of the shyer,  Radius (t)1 to (t)2  and (t)2 to (t)3 would be the ratio, from (t)1 squared in relation to (t)3 and so on. (t)ratio 1:3. Where TIME may be considered as a RATIO. Time itself does not travel but the distance that gives matter and mass momentum seems like time travels. Velocity is the change of distance relative to speed and acceleration i.e. meters per second squared, notice that the second squared is a constant, when passing of time on an object or matter is moving.

Concern regarding Draft:Time Ratio
Hello, Paul Manion. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Time Ratio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Time Ratio


Hello, Paul Manion. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Time Ratio".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)