User talk:Paul Vogel/216.99.245.184

Look, I've tried to point out your error, and I've unfortunately failed to make you see it. You'll notice white separatist is now a fair and balanced article; much superior to the unattributed quote you tried to pass off as an NPOV article.

Now, will you stop pasting that quote all over the place under inappropriate titles like "Separatists"? Thanks. -- Hadal 21:09, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)

On the contrary, you were the one that "failed" to present a NPOV or "fair and balanced" article on "White Separatism", with you and other pc bigots always trying to present "White Separatism" as being only "White Supremacy", remember? Yes, I agree that the new article is better and that the quote attributation is appropriate, but, it still was a NPOV accurately and honestly reflecting what and how any "White Separatist" himself, actually defines himself as being and as believing. Thanks! :D


 * Whatever.. if you can't see that presenting one view to the exclusion of all others is unquestionably biased, I don't know what to tell you. I'll agree that there may be an ideological distinction between white supremacy and white separatism (however flimsy that distinction may be), but that quote was not an acceptable "article" on the subject. I've never heard the term "PC bigot" before; seems like an oxymoron to me, but hey.

Whatever, indeed! LOL! :D

I do see, and that is why I always insist upon a NPOV in any articles. Remember, you were the one's insisting upon only your own PC POV, and NOT the NPOV which indicates that the two terms, "separatism" and "supremacism" were quite separate and distinct.

On the contrary, the term "PC bigot" is not any "oxymoron" when you do understand that "Political Correctness" is only a Marxist Dogmatism that is always being enforced by "PC bigots" that do censor and deny any Freedom of Speech for their own political critics.


 * Please realise that creating a page like "Separatsists" only to direct people to "white separatist" is completely inappropriate and misleading. Please do not do this again. Thank you, -- Hadal 21:27, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Duh..., obviously, that was actually only a "typo". The revised article to White separatist is NPOV enough now to stand unreverted and uncontested. Thank you. :D

Paul -- if you don't immediately stop you will be banned from the site. You've been warned many times. BCorr ¤ &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 23:08, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC)

YAWN.....I only revert or edit for a NPOV and for objective and factual accuracy. Ban all you like, the TRUTH will remain...ALWAYS... whether you POV do think so, and do censor and do ban it, or not!-PV