User talk:Paul at Pegasun

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Pegasunsolution", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 09:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of interest and promotional editing
Hello, Pegasunsolution. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Pegasun, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 09:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

There have been two problems identified with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia; and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Would you clarify the proposed name please? "Ref" looks more like a position than an individual's name. Positions are not acceptable because the person behind a position is liable to change. Alternatively you can use a completely unconnected name. To speed this up, it's a good idea to check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:ListUsers to make sure that the username you want is not already taken. Just Chilling (talk) 01:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

reply
Thanks for email. It's been made clear above that you have chosen a user name that represents a company, which is not allowed, and you accept that. Since you you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you should not be writing about your own company anyway. The unblock instructions make it clear that you will only be unblocked if you agree not to write on that topic, which is clearly your intention from the comments above

The fact that other articles exist doesn't help you, you are judged on what you write.

You did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, press releases, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. Your only source was your own website, you said nothing that demonstrated notability, and the purpose of the article seems to be just to list your products and a link to your website, clearly promotional intent.

If you have any further comments, you can post here, I'm watching the page now Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

reply I see, that makes sense. I believe some sources could be in the /Company/Awards section. Where big named independent blogs wrote about the products. Another could be a subscription magazine service called "Computer Active". If you google both "Synei" and "Computer Active", I believe you will find it fairly easily. I guess the main problem is I should not be writing about the company work at anyway. Hmm... Alright, I can accept that. However, my true intention was basically just to create a company page and list the products. As more sources came in, I was going to leave it up to the consumers to fill in all the details, whether it be good or bad. Following the example of Auslogics/Iobit, they've started with no sources, but Iobit gained negative sources as time grew, meanwhile, Auslogics still have nothing notable on the wiki page. I don't mind contributing to Wikipedia at all, however, I will admit one of my goal was to create a neutral company page that demonstrated only facts regarding the company (in non promoting way). Thank you for your time and explanation.
 * So, can you tell use what you will edit if unblocked?  Vanjagenije   (talk) 

reply I am definitely willing to contribute to Wikipedia. I can research things and make sure they are up to date and not missing any information. However, at the same time, I would like to request that I'm allowed to keep the page "Pegasun" live. It was not intended for advertisement, I was simply looking for the page to be "live", for positive/negative. Exactly how companies like /wiki/auslogics and /wiki/iobit has it.