User talk:Paula Natasha Chavez

May 2014
Hello, Paula Natasha Chavez. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Patent troll, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 00:17, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Origin of the term patent troll
Hello. First, I suggest using the article's talk page Talk:Patent troll for any further discussion. That will help other editors become aware of it, and make it much easier to come to consensus about your proposed changes. In regard to your specific comments, however, I'll respond with a couple of points.

Wikipedia requires content to be WP:Verifiable. The video you used as a supporting reference is not ideal for that. It's been uploaded by an anonymous account, and the info on the video's page links to a dead site (www.ogandthak.com). Additionally, the video doesn't mention your name, or the name of your firm, so it doesn't actually support much of the content you added to the article. In other words, it's not quite what Wikipedia considers a WP:RS, a reliable source.

As you say, the video does suggest that the term patent troll is older than the article says. This is an important point, and one that's worthy of further discussion. I will start a discussion on the talk page and see what other editors make of it. Grayfell (talk) 09:04, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Paula Natasha Chavez (talk) 00:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Signatures
Just a quick note, in order to sign your name properly on Wikipedia, simply type four tildes (~) with no other scharacters or spaces. This generates a time-stamp which makes it much easier to follow a conversation. If you would like to add your name, you can do that before the tildes, not after, and not in the middle. (WP:SIGNATURE has more). Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2014 (UTC)