User talk:Paulacere

Citation help
Check out WP:Citation templates for some tips on how to properly format sources. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

The article Jake sinetos has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jake sinetos
A tag has been placed on Jake sinetos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. NtheP (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Because it didn't show why he was important. Why did you blank my talk page?  Nyttend (talk) 14:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Nyttend. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User talk:Nyttend has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Blehfu (talk) 14:44, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Nyttend, you may be blocked from editing. Nyttend (talk) 14:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to User talk:Nyttend. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. Blehfu (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2010 (UTC)