User talk:Paulatreides1

Any article that starts "I have heard some intriguing rumors" is not a reliable source. It's trash. Earthscent (talk) 19:00, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

That article quotes "trusted sources" not any actual writer or producer. So it's just as likely that the whole thing is made up by the author of the article. A completely unreliable source. Earthscent (talk) 19:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

If this TrekMovie source you mention confirms the information in question, please cite it by the paragraph you're trying to add. Earthscent (talk) 19:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Your recent editing history at Star Trek (2017 TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mlpearc Phone ( open channel ) 19:20, 22 May 2016 (UTC)