User talk:Paulbracegirdle

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mak (talk)  23:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Commercial links
Greetings, welcome to Wikipedia. I saw your post on Makemi's talk page. Please read the external links policy, with particular attention to No. 5 under "Links normally to be avoided". Once in a while commercial links are OK but not all that often; this situation only occurs when there is considerable encyclopedic content about the subject at the site, but not when the primary purpose of the external site is to sell something related to the Wikipedia article. Hope this helps, Antandrus (talk) 00:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Corporate Vanity Policy Enforcement
Seeing that you re-contributed the commercial link removed by Makemi, let me offer this for perspective, and in support of Antandrus and Makemi:

From Corporate vanity policy enforcement. Dear Community:

The volume of corporate vanity/vandalism which is showing up on Wikipedia is overwhelming. At the office, we are receiving dozens of phone calls *per week* about company, organization, and marketing edits which are reverted, causing the non-notable, but self-aggrandizing authors, to scream bloody murder. This is as it should be. However, I am issuing a call to arms to the community to act in a much more draconian fashion in response to corporate self-editing and vanity page creation. This is simply out of hand, and we need your help.

We are the #14 website in the world. We are a big target. If we are to remain true to our encyclopedic mission, this kind of nonsense cannot be tolerated. This means the administrators and new page patrol need to be clear when they see new usernames and page creation which are blatantly commercial - shoot on sight. There should be no question that someone who claims to have a "famous movie studio" and has exactly 2 Google hits - both their Myspace page - they get nuked. Ban users who promulgate such garbage for a significant period of time. They need to be encouraged to avoid the temptation to recreate their article, thereby raising the level of damage and wasted time they incur.

Some of you might think regular policy and VfD is the way to go. I am here to tell you it is not enough. We are losing the battle for encyclopedic content in favor of people intent on hijacking Wikipedia for their own memes. This scourge is a serious waste of time and energy. We must put a stop to this now. Thank you for your help.

"Brad Patrick"

"User:BradPatrick"

"Wikimedia Foundation, Inc."

-- Paleorthid 17:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

____________________________________________

Since when is the US Patent Office "Spam"! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Paulbracegirdle (talk • contribs) 11:28, 6 November 2006.

November 06, 2006
Removed external link spam from Biosolids, Dredge, and Fiber reinforced concrete - Paleorthid 17:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Heat Recovery Bin
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -WarthogDemon 03:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Patent cite template
You may be interested in these templates used to link to US patents: US patent, US patent reference, and US patent application. Use "what links here" to survey use. -- Paleorthid 01:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Paul bracegirdle - hangon
Removal of a speedy delete tag is vandalism. If you are not capable of reading the tag and creating an hangon tag and message, you do not deserve to be allowed here. Any further action such as that and you will find yourself blocked. -- RHaworth 19:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)  Chris 21:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Paul Bracegirdle
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Paul Bracegirdle, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Paul Bracegirdle seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Paul Bracegirdle, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)