User talk:Paulbrookes

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nationaltreatmentagencylogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nationaltreatmentagencylogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 01:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:NTAlogo.gif)
You've uploaded File:NTAlogo.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 14:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Chubby? Hmm, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anorexia and Trope (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Chubby? Hmmm … for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chubby? Hmmm … is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chubby? Hmmm … until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 21:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

David Bowie and Connect 4
David Bowie inventing Connect 4 is obviously rubbish, but it's a story clearly traceable to Stuart Maconie. Are we saying this can only stand if I can find the exact copy of New Musical Express in which it was written?

A page you started (Sportpark Unterhaching) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sportpark Unterhaching, Paulbrookes!

Wikipedia editor Deb just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please add some independent references to verify the content."

To reply, leave a comment on Deb's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of The Man With the Stick


The article The Man With the Stick has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Excessively detailed fancruft sourced only to the show itself. Despite the excessive detail, the contents are very strange and it is difficult to tell what any of it actually means.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reyk YO!  19:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)