User talk:Paulettelong

HANGON-I BELIEVE THE MATERIAL WAS COPIED FROM MY WEBSITE BY THE WEB SITE THAT YOU GIVE AS ORGINAL AUTHOR. The donated material has been developed by Cellulite Endermologie Center, our web site, since 2002. Many other web sites have copied our material since then, including the newer web site http://betterhealthliving.com/endermologie2.htm.htm.(which is not ours) to which you attribute the material.

Citations have been given derived from objective medical research regarding what endermologie is and we do not mention that our company provides the service.

What is wrong with people knowing about a proprietary and unique process? Paulette Long

Hangon II Please explain why Ionithermie is entitled to a page in Wikipedia and Endermologie is not? Paulette Long-See below. Also, why do these:Iontophoresis, ultrasound, thermotherapy, pressotherapy (pneumatic massaging in the direction of the circulation), lymphatic drainage (massage technique to stimulate lymphatic flow), electrolipophoresis (application of a low frequency electric current) and high frequency, such as radio frequency, electric current have all been tried. get mentioned in Wikipedia and Endermologie does not? Please provide the rationale to us.

Ionithermie From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from other articles related to it. (October 2006)

Ionithermie is the name of a treatment offered in some spas that claims to

reduce the appearance of cellulite improve and smooth skin texture slim the body, causing the loss of between 1-8 inches on the very first treatment firm and tone muscles, lifting slackening areas and flattening the abdomen detoxify and re-mineralize the body, raising body energy levels and the metabolism The actual process involves the application of electronic stimulation (claims to employ Galvanic and Faradic electrical currents), micronized algae, and conductive thermal aroma clay.

A Clinical and Instrumental study to evaluate the efficacy of Ionithermie in patients with Edematious Fibrosclerotic Panniculopathy (Cellulite), was performed in 2006 by Gustavo Leibaschoff, MD and Juliana Melamed, MD and their team.

The evaluation team was divided into three separate teams.

Team 1: Carried out the clinical and image studeis, coordinated time, scheduling and performed the Ionithermie treatments.

Team 2: This team monitored the patient's point of view. They asked about the satisfaction of the patien. They kep a record after each session, they asked about relaxation, discomfort, and what kinds of changes they were noticing.

Team 3: This team used vidocapillaroscopy to determin the results of the study. Capillary images erer obtained with a videocapillaroscope of 200X magifying power lenses. Images were saved in a computer. Data was saved in electronic format.

RESULTS: 100% of the patients entering the experimental study completed the trial. (10 patients)

Results of the clinical and image study: Team 1: The participants kept their normal diet during the treatment, it was observed at the last follow-up visit that each patient had decreased their weight by an average of 6 pounds, and obtained an improvement in their body contour.

Results showed skin surface improvment, decrease of the cutaneous retraction, and body contour changes in 80% of the patients. After the series of treatments, the average inch-loss per patient was 4.6 inches (total inch-loss for 8 measured areas: upper waist, natural waist, lower waist, upper hip, lower hip, top thigh, mid-thigh and above knee)

Team 2: Results show that 100% of the paricipants were pleased with the body contour changes. They said that their clothes were not as tight in areas that had been treated as compared to before the treatment. They also noticed a skin surface improvement, more smoothness and fewer retractions caused by fibrous bands. They reported a pleasant relaxation during the procedure.

Team 3: Videocapillaroscopy results: results were based ont he analysis of an average of 4 images per session, i.e., and average of 8 images per patient, and a total of about 120 images for the entire study. It was observed that 100% of patients completing the trial showed a significant statistical modification in the analysis of vertical capillary density before and after treatment. Results were based on ANOVA analysis with a reliability coefficient of 5% (p<0.05). Vertical capillary density showed an average benefit of 31+/- 10% capillaries/mm2, before and after treatment in patients with statistically significant changes between day 0 and day 80. Both a significant decrease in ischemia and the reduction of the edema around the capillaries area were noted.

Ionithermie has been studied by external laboratories and show significant reduction in Cellulite and 96% success rate in inch loss for 12 women using the products and treatments over a 2 week period.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionithermie" Categories: Therapy Hidden categories: Orphaned articles from October 2006 | All orphaned articles | Articles lacking sources (Erik9bot)


 * Hi Paulette. If you want to discuss the deletion of the Endermologie page, you could try asking one of the administrators who deleted the page (it was deleted twice by two different admins). Their names and links to their user talk pages show up in the reddish box at the top of the page if you click on the red Endermologie link. Trying to start a discussion here on your talk page will most ikely not have any result, as it is unlikely that the people involved will look at this page. (Note that you should have placed a tag on the article itself, before it was deleted, and not on your talk page. After the article has been deleted, it is too late to place hangon tags.)


 * You should make sure that you are familiar with some of the more important Wikipedia policies before discussing the matter with the reviewing administrators; the copyright policy and the policy concerning advertising are the ones that directly apply to the reasons why the article was deleted. Please also have a look at the policy concerning conflict of interest issues -- you should, as a general rule, avoid writing or editing articles about subjects you are closely affiliated with. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 12:55, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Endermologie
A tag has been placed on Endermologie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Endermologie and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 06:57, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Endermologie
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Endermologie, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://betterhealthliving.com/endermologie2.htm.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. --bonadea contributions talk 22:37, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

My talk page
Hi,

You seem to want to talk to me about a speedy deletion I undertook. I moved the material to a new section on my talk page. I can't really make heads or tails of your complaint as it is written. Please leave a comment here explaining why you feel the article should not be deleted. I will do my best to explain my actions and articulate our inclusion policies to you. This conversation will occur most easily if you leave a short complaint with clear and concise claims. Thank you. Protonk (talk) 01:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Main street free press museum
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Main street free press museum, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Main street free press museum appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Main street free press museum has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

No copyright infringement

 * Note: I moved Paulettelong's comments to the bottom of the page to make the conversation easier to follow. I have not edited the comments in any other way. --bonadea contributions talk 09:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

There is not copyright infringement with main street free press museum. We own all the urls associated with the web site. all the URLS point to that web site. There is no other museum known as the free press museum that has a web site. the web site you are referring to is our web site. Please explaint the copyright infringement here, Paulette Long

The Main Street Free Press Museum owns all the URLs associated with the Main Street Free Press Museum; Main-Street-Free-Press-Museum.org; mainstreetfreepressmuseum.org; freepressmuseum.org; free-press-museum.org. All these URLS are directed to the same web site so that the site may easily be found. There is no copyright infringement here. We could find no other free press museum to be infringed.

What is the problem here?.---Paulettelong

There is no copyright infringement. Again, no other free press museum exists as far as we can find other than the Main Street Free Press Museum that we have written about. Moreover, all the URLs including free-press-museum.org belong to the Mains Stret Free Press Museum. Others: Main-street-free-press-museum.org; free-press-museum.org, et. al.paulette long


 * I'm sorry that the note above was apparently difficult to understand. I'll try to explain what "copyright infringement" means in this context - it has nothing to do with other museums, or other URLs, but it is to do with the fact that the text in the Wikipedia article you wrote was taken straight from your website. All text that is published to the World Wide Web, on any website anywhere, is copyrighted unless there is a clear statement to the contrary. That means that the text on free-press-museum.org (and all the other sites you mention above) is by default copyrighted. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text unless there is clear permission from the authors that the text may be used. A note on your talk page that you own the site is not sufficient permission.  Please read the note above: the three bullet points tell you exactly what steps you must take to donate the text to Wikipedia. Again, discussing it here or on any editor's talk page will not be sufficient.


 * NOTE: Before creating another Wikipedia article about any person or organisation that you have any affiliation with, please read this information. It is important that you are aware of Wikipedia's policies concerning conflict of interest. Thank you very much! --bonadea contributions talk 09:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)