User talk:Paulgush

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dakota ~  °  23:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of O'pen BIC
A tag has been placed on O'pen BIC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cindamuse (talk) 16:18, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Did you rfta? If you had, you might have noticed it's not about a company, but about a product made by a company, and an unusually successful one.Paulgush (talk) 16:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Products and services relate to a corporation or company within the CSD guidelines. This article lacks any indication of notability. The priority is to indicate notability within the article itself, supported by significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Thanks. Cindamuse (talk) 17:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * You will note that I added templates and categories to indicate that the boat is an ISAF class. Most readers of the article will appreciate the significance of that.  Wouldn't it be better to find out something about the subject of the article or the general topic before leaping to judgment so quickly?  You slapped this speedy deletion box up there before I even finished adding content. Paulgush (talk) 17:24, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Werner Swanepoel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scrum-half (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Re: Transfermarkt
They don't advertise it much, but all of Transfermarkt's database content is user-generated, making it no more reliable than Wikipedia itself. You'll find an WP:RSN discussion on the matter here, and the decision to disallow Transfermarkt as a source has been reinforced by the WikiProject Football in hte intervening years. The numbers might be perfectly accurate, but without proper sourcing they do not belong in the article, and the burden to find these source lies with the editor who adds the content, you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:47, 30 July 2017 (UTC)


 * @Sir Sputnik It rankles a bit to have replaced an implausible and uncited statistic (Kaiser Chiefs having 20 million supporters in Southern Africa) with a believable and cited one (average crowd attendance of 13,000), only to be told that the burden for finding a better source lies on me. Paulgush (talk) 19:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Breyton Paulse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Leads and introductions
Hi Paulgush. Thank you for taking an interest in the article Airspeed. I am currently examining your recent edits, and particularly your edits to the lead section.

Wikipedia guidelines recommend that “… the lead section should be accessible to as broad an audience as possible.” See MOS:INTRO which also says “Where possible, avoid difficult-to-understand terminology …”

Some of your editing is not consistent with these guidelines. For example in your recent edit to the lead you added: IAS: “It is calculated using impact pressure from the pitot static system, assuming sea level static pressure and speed of sound.” (See your diff)

A broad general audience cannot be expected to comprehend such concepts as impact pressure, pitot static system, sea level static pressure, or the significance of the speed of sound – especially for a low-speed aircraft.

An advanced audience of aerospace engineers will challenge your suggestion that indicated airspeed is calculated. Indicated airspeed is influenced by the position error, and this error can only be determined by flight test methods such as tower fly-by, trailing static, or using GPS to fly a triangular course.

Wikipedia recommends that “It is particularly important for the first section (the "lead" section, above the table of contents) to be understandable to a broad readership.” See WP:EXPLAINLEAD.

Our article on Airspeed is a technical article, and WP:Make technical articles understandable provides a lot of good advice on writing for technical articles.

Please revisit your edits to Airspeed and adjust any that aren’t consistent with these guidelines. Thanks. Dolphin ( t ) 03:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Point taken, I simplified the opening section.
 * I have to disagree on this though:
 * An advanced audience of aerospace engineers will challenge your suggestion that indicated airspeed is calculated. Indicated airspeed is influenced by the position error, and this error can only be determined by flight test methods such as tower fly-by, trailing static, or using GPS to fly a triangular course.
 * An airspeed indicator is not merely a pressure gauge, nor is it magic. It's an analogue computer that does a non-linear calculation. Determining and then correcting for the position error is the act of calibrating it leading to a calibrated airspeed. The ASI itself knows nothing about its errors. Paulgush (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for making your recent changes to Airspeed. They have eliminated the problem. Thanks also for replying to my message.
 * Where you wrote “It is calculated using impact pressure from the pitot static system ...” and inserted it into the lead you were writing about indicated airspeed. Where you wrote “An airspeed indicator is not merely a pressure gauge ...It’s an analogue computer ...” you are writing about the indicator, the gauge, the piece of hardware that is installed in the instrument panel; and the way it is calibrated by the gauge manufacturer. Indicated airspeed is not a gauge or a piece of hardware.
 * A PEC diagram can be used to find EAS or CAS corresponding to an IAS. The EAS or CAS can then be used to perform calculations, but IAS is not used in calculations whereas EAS is regularly used in calculations. If you disagree, can you give a numerical example of a calculation that begins or ends with IAS?
 * When a gauge manufacturer is calibrating an ASI, any calculation of pressure difference across the pitot and static ports is done using TAS, not IAS. (As you know, an ASI is calibrated to read TAS at sea level in the standard atmosphere.) Dolphin ( t ) 21:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)