User talk:Paulhesq

My thoughts on evolution...The single chain of Evolution and its three chapters.
It was Victorian high society that first adapted the word 'evolution' and used it to describe the work of Charles Darwin and his most famous work 'the origin of species'. Today many scientist still use this 'evolution' to describe what those in the know today refer to as biological evolution. Even though the dictionary confirms the use of this word in this context, the dictionary is not scientific, the dictionary only reflects popular opinion and some times popular opinion is wrong, most up to date Scientist today refer to the process of descent by modification as described by Charles Darwin as biological evolution... If one throws away the victorian meaning of the word and places biological evolution in its appropriate context, then it becomes all to clear that biological evolution is an advancement of a much larger process. For ease of explaining this process you must come to understand our existence from the big bang to the present day is a single story, a book that spans billions of years each page, each event leading to the next, if you then agree with this hypothesis, because each event is linked, it must also follow that everything must have ancestry. By everything it is fundamental to my theory that you also understand that Darwins natural selection has primitive history beyond the Earth.. If one was to explain an over view of the process that brought us here, and because biological evolution is accepted in science today i must re-use the word evolution, not to describe only biological evolution, but by way of describing the three chapters or punctuated stages that trace the advancement of selection process and also our rise to life,existence.

A favourite way of mine to answering questions which may be out of reach for the time being is to model similar phenomenon observed on Earth today as a way of hopefully gaining some logical insight. An explosion, the radiating ripples created by dropping pebble in a pond, the swirls of smoke are all examples of energy release on Earth. The big bang may loosely follow all three of these energy release processes...... Primordial evolution was conceived initially without a selection process, the huge out pouring of energy created by the big bang rode rough shot over the sensitivity of the elements. An explosion of such magnitude would be ignorant to the diversity of reaction between the elements, and the single chaotic reaction dominates. The massive out pouring of concentrated energy dissipates through time and a more serene calm may eventually be reached. Initial unorganised chaos tails off. In the same way that materials are distributed amongst a planetary disc, a point in time for the interaction between the elements in the universe is also dictated by nature. When this point is reached, the primordial selection process may begin. Nature can only answer natural questions with natural answers, it can not lie. For some the difference between primordial evolution and biological evolution is so great that one may contend that one has nothing to do with the other. The only major difference between the two is the circumstances in which the selection process finds itself. Biological and primordial evolution share some key characteristics. Biological evolution answers the question of locomotion on earth in several ways (parallel evolution),primordial evolution does this also by way of galaxies stars and solar systems. Biological evolution may create and fill niches for life here on Earth, the nature of the niche and the mix of available elements dictates how far the life form may evolve. Primordial evolution created a niche, the Earth is a niche and because the right elements are present life on Earth thrives. The Earth represents a microcosm of primordial evolution. Primordial evolution has been trapped and concentrated on Earth, this has enabled primordial evolution to advance. The first chapter gave rise to the second. Biological evolution evolved.

Paulhesq 18:24, 20 July 2005 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulhesq (talk • contribs) 22:36, 15 July 2005


 * Everything that has gained any level of complexity started out as basic.

If the Above statement holds true to observation then biological evolution must of evolved from a less complex process.The theory of single chain evolution represents an overview of evolution from the big bang to the present day, clearly evolution has advanced from the primordial interaction of the non-organic to biological evolution and on to the evolution of intelligence. From the beginning there has always been a process of selection, selection itself, when circumstances have allowed has also advanced. Everything in the observed universe has been selected by one or more of the three selection processes.
 * For ourselves all three processes of selection run simultaneously.

Primordial evolution......... Primal selection.
For ease of explanation it has been necessary to bring all non-organic interactions under one umbrella. In many ways primordial evolution is similar to that of biological evolution in so much that is has no direction, circumstance prevailing forces and material dictate the outcome. The main difference between the primordial and the biological process would be that primordial evolution has no blueprint of memory or DNA. The lack of direction in evolution is a stumbling block to thought that is counteracted when you ask the question of how did i arrived here, how can i explain my rise to existence, it is then that the long chain of positive cause effect and selection can be clearly seen........... The single chain of evolution runs in chronological order, page to pager chapter to chapter, one punchtuation of the process blends into its next. At its most advanced primordial evolution is capable of evolving pockets of balance, solar systems like our own take millions of years to evolve, in the chaos the planet building material is organised around the sun in the only natural way it can. Primal selection is best described as the just naturally so result of such non-organic encounters.… During the build plantesimals will inevitably collide, debris is once again arranged according to [all factors] or primal selection, the larger plantesimals the fittest go on to gain longevity in existence and balance. Because it is clear that a selection process is employed, and also because the rearranged build evolves whereby the fittest go on to dominate, the accretion of planets that form around a sun can be described as a process of modification by descent with selection.
 * Everything has history to the begining... [With one possible exception]
 * The planets that we observe today in our solar system, would be the fittest to have survived in the given circumstances.--195.93.21.39 04:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Biological evolution......... Natural selection.
Natural selection. Many see 'natural selection' as just the tipping point. Biological evolution is a constant, therefore natural selection is also constant, all life forms are relentlessly challenged by external forces.

Intelligent evolution........ Human selection.
The difference in all three chapters of the single chain process are the circumstance and type of material in which the process finds itself. That is primordial evolution gave rise to a change in environment [broad niche [mutation]] in which biological evolution was allowed to evolve, intelligent evolution follows this pattern also. Primordial evolution only deals with non-organic material. Biological, organic. Intelligent evolution for purposes of my study focuses on the outward application of intelligence only, no reference to the organic brain is needed.

Template the mechanism by which the biological process of evolution operates directly onto the evolution intelligence, as one would expect, because one process is an advancement of the other there will be differences as well as compelling simularities. The biological primordial soup..........The pool of ideas.

Points, loose notes.

[what makes intelligent selection an advancement of natural selection] Conscious awareness, potential for manipulation of nature. The outward application of intelligence. How, Why does intelligence evolve? How to measure? What does it do? Is it a force. 3 chapters. When you fully understand 2/3 of a journey can you accurately predict the last?
 * The process finds direction.


 * Selection, a process of selection every step of the way.

Template the mechanism.

Place every problem solving idea that man will have into a think tank....

The good ideas that are deemd as having some value in answering any given query are selected and graded, and given further concideration. Ideas are passed down from generation to generation and modified by intelligent selection.

When intelligence focuses on a specific problem, say how to design and build a better automobile or computer for example, then the accumulation of selected advantageous answers complement each other. [runaway growth] 195.93.21.39 06:59, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Having the potential to mutate is all important.

Single chain evolution
The 'single chain of evolution' proposes that biological evolution and its mechanism of selection evolved from a less complex related process and furthermore the process advanced to human intelligent evolution. The evolution of intelligence deals with all that is good, the positive endeavours and results of humanities intellect. Ignorance would be decay, positive evolution in reverse, extinction. The biological process holds out life to be tested by the niche. You may bolt at my theory, but i hold it out for you here anyway. By templating nature on nature, it appears to me that plausiblility turns to stubborness with time, and yet all species that survive today had it within them, the potential to mutate. Its shape form and motion. plausibility to stubbornness. Insight gained by making comparison of each chapter. Thought process and reason. Direction in the process is achieved as intelligence evolves. ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Biological evolution is but a portion of a larger process, biological evolution itself evolved.

The big bang, a single beginning started the process, this process has moved through three punctuated stages. Anything in nature that displays any level of complexity always starts out as basic. The three punctuated stages are: Primordial evolution............ Primal selection. [non organic] Biological evolution............ Natural selection. [organic] Intelligent evolution............ Intelligent selection. [outward application of]

Single chain evolution is easily applied to the mind if one envisages three trees bearing fruit.The fruit of the first tree is the second tree, and the second the third.All three trees are related, indeed it is not the process that changes but rather the circumstance and type of ingredients.

In the same way that it understood that biological evolution has no direction, the single chain of evolution can be thought of in the same way, it is only when you asks the question of how your existence came about that it is then possible to see a positive branch line within the chain.

What is primordial evolution? Since 'single chain evolution' represents a broad overview of the process it is necessary to bring all non-organic interactions under one umbrella. Primordial evolution is the interaction of force/forces on the non-organic.

What is primal selection?

The whole concept of selection in biological evolution seems to be misunderstood, to most it represents the tipping point whereby a species becomes extinct, the fact of the matter is that since all species may become extinct at any time, then natural selection is constant, in this way one can understand that primal selection is also constant. [ constantly evaluating assessing and projecting the correct result in real time.] Primordial selection is best described as the 'just naturally so result' of interaction between force and the non organic. Think on this..... In space or on Earth the shape of clouds are selected by primal selection.

Some may argue that primordial evolution is not evolution at all, one may contend that primordial evolution does not posses the key characteristics of 'victorian evolution' descent modification and survival of the fittest. To this i reply that the person is not looking to how biological evolution evolved, but instead looking for some sort of exacting parallel process. Primordial evolution does indeed posses modification descent and survival, but this is only achieved at the optimum level that both circumstance and material will allow.

This solar system is a pocket of balance, the planets we observe in our solar system today did not gain their balance at the first attempt, the process of accretion is in itself a struggle whereby through descent and successful modification the fittest go on survive.

If you have the agility of thought to see that primordial evolution is real then one may also broaden out the meaning of the niche environment. This universe is a niche environment for all elements and forces that exists within?

Without the anchor of Primal selection science could not function. How could we possibly analyse or predict?

Biological evolution, single word 'evolution' to the victorian mindset is a work of sheer genius. It is not my intention to slate biological evolution and contend Darwin wrong, mine is to place biological evolution within its rightful context in the chain, this i do by focusing on the key mechanism and phrases, by regression to observe the primordial past of biological evolution and then by advancement to see where its cutting edge lies.

Intelligent evolution and selection.

Each phase in chain evolution works within its own confines so i leave the non-organic and the organic and move on to outward application of intelligence. Make no mistake here, because of the fundamental question i ask i count the successes of primordial evolution and biological evolution as positives, intelligent evolution represents the positive good achievements of mankind...................... Place all the ideas hypothesis theories that mankind will ever have into a think tank, in its earliest form this represents the primordial soup of intelligence. Knowledge, know how, technology are passed down from generation to generation recorded modified and selected according to merit, science and our artefacts have evolved by such means. The best ideas and innovations are built upon through time.

Whilst biologists place evolution under the microscope and examine the fine weave of the canvass, it would be understandable for them to contend that my broad overview of evolution has nothing to do with the popular conception of. To this i answer that it is not my fault that i have stepped back to see the bigger picture and not just the cloth closest to hand. My evolution is bigger than theirs, my explanations broader.............. A new born child has no conception of any external stimulation. Fom plausibility to stubbornness, one switch stands more importantly than random mutation and that is that the life form already has within itself the ability, the potential to mutate in the first place.....

paul.

62.255.123.225 21:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)