User talk:Paulley/Archive 8

Hi
Hi, my name is Will. I see that you were one of the founding members of WP:PW. Well I'm not sure how active you've been in keeping up with the changes the project has made, but if you would like to be updated, I'm up too it.-- Will C  18:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I was speaking mainly on formats changes. The project pretty much is full of drama these days because of them.-- Will C  02:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Hey
I remember you. :) Nice to see you back around. I've made the move. Nikki  ♥  311   03:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

FWA/XWA Matters
Hey man, you seem a bit interested in the FWA articles and that so I thought I'd point you to this article which seems to suggest the new FWA World Championship is the same British Heavyweight Championship ("he FWA management team has taken the historic step of reclassifying the title as the FWA World Heavyweight Championship"). I figure we might as well wait until a new champ is crowned because I think it's gonna take a few shows but it's something to consider. Hopefully they'll soon put up a title history thing to make things clear but this could mean either making the XWA Belt article start with (I think) Joel Redman or maybe duplicating the FWA reigns on both pages? I'm not sure what's going on with the Flyweight Championship but I don't think it's a continued lineage from XWA's version because although the match for it features Spud, it is billed as a "qualifier" round robin tournament so surely the encumbent wouldn't neeed to qualify. Anyhow, just some thoughts. Tony2Times (talk) 18:52, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * How're we gonna keep both histories on one page though? Unless XWA stops promoting their belt and starts a new one from scratch they're both gonna have different champions at different times. Hopefully the Flyweight will unify; it'll be easier on us at least. Tony2Times (talk) 21:41, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The thing with that is as the title continues to grow it's gonna look confusing. With WCW and TNA, when their titles broke away from the NWA Championship they started new articles. If FWA were gonna start a new lineage then I was fine with it being a new page but that article shows it's the same lineage so I think XWA's one should have its own page that details its previous lineage, just like TNA's does about NWA. Tony2Times (talk) 22:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah definitely best to wait to see what happens - XWA may be forced to create a new champion or they might be unified or FWA might maker late it clear that it's a new belt. I changed the current Flyweight name to be FWA 2005-07 and XWA 07-present because we don't know for sure what's gonna happen; maybe we should do the same with the Heavyweight title. I've put a note in the intro about it being uncertain what the belt's lineage for the Flyweight will be. Tony2Times (talk) 17:47, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh God it's so bad I just feel like deleting everything and starting again. I'm pretty bad with promotion articles though; I tried writing one for LDN but only got half way through. Finding sources for British wrestling is pretty hard but the amount of info in the FWA section is too much even if it was sourced I think. Tony2Times (talk) 17:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm just knocking up a proper set of championships boxes but I was wondering if you knew of anywhere I could get sources for the defunct championships which I don't have any dates and such for. Tony2Times (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

The Incredible Hulk #600
Do you know what happened in The Incredible Hulk #600 and if so what? If the Red and Green Hulk fought each other who won or who was winning before Red Hulk cheated (if he did)? The K.O. King (talk) 01:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:DwilliamsFWA.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DwilliamsFWA.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.40.120 (talk) 04:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Red Hulk
Hi. I've started a consensus discussion on the edit conflict on Red Hulk here. Can you offer your opinion on the four points there? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Request for your opinion
Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 07:14, 10 September 2009 (UTC)