User talk:Paulmaunders

Commercial use of Image:Fubra logo.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Fubra logo.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Fubra logo.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Fubra logo.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Fubra Limited
I have moved this article, to save the content, to your user space. It currently reads like SPAM especially since it does not seem particulalry notable. The style is also not encyclopedic. I have recommended it is reviewed for deletion. David D. (Talk) 18:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * By the way, did you know you have another account here? David D. (Talk) 18:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi paul, i just noted your message. I realise it was a work in progress but given your personal involvement i thought it best to delete. I did save the copy for you since I think it has promise. You need to model it on other company sites. It comes across as far to like a personal recollection rather than a sourced third party description. If you have good sources quote them. Personal information known only to you and your partner are not acceptable. The verifiability of the article is more important that the truth. I know this sounds a bit silly but it is critical to ensure the accuracy of the articles here. I hope these pointer help you develop the article into something more useful to the encyclopedia. Feel free to ask for help in proof reading. David D. (Talk) 16:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of List of companies based in Aldershot
A tag has been placed on List of companies based in Aldershot, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Closedmouth (talk) 06:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fubra_logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Fubra_logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 03:33, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Paulmaunders, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Paulmaunders/Fubra. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you please explain why you shut DASHBot down? Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:25, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Manor-Coach-House.jpg


The file File:Manor-Coach-House.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 January 2020 (UTC)