User talk:Paulo Estevão Pauli

March 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Collatz conjecture. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

''Please discuss your proposed changes at Talk:Collatz conjecture. '' Reify-tech (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

WP:OR
Hi Paulo Estevão Pauli,

Welcome to Wikipedia. You have recently been adding material to the article Collatz conjecture and to its talk page. Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not an appropriate venue for your work: encyclopedias are not publishers of original research. You can read our policy forbidding this here. Before adding your work to Wikipedia, it should be published in a reliable source (like a traditional mathematics journal). In addition, it is a conflict of interest to promote your own work (see our guideline here).

--JBL (talk) 21:16, 8 March 2020 (UTC)