User talk:Paulpelzl

Copyright issue with The field station la gamba}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at :, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. BigDT 23:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The field station la gamba
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia. We cannot accept copyrighted material for legal reasons, as it is not compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License. Your contributions must be in your own words.

You have created the same article at least two times using text from another website. This is not allowed at Wikipedia. You may post an article about this subject, but it has to be in your own words, not copied from another source. Thank you. -- Butseriouslyfolks 10:06, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Action Reconciliation Service for Peace (ARSP)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Action Reconciliation Service for Peace (ARSP), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Tagged for months with notability concerns, still lacks reliable 3rd party references

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 12:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Fred Friedman for deletion
The article Fred Friedman is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fred Friedman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IZAK (talk) 10:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)