User talk:Paulusar

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:WO2 Royal Navy.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WO2 Royal Navy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. єmarsee •  Speak up!  05:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Gor: the "Rebuttal"
Don't want to smack you down, since you mostly do good work on the Gor articles, but Wikipedia isn't really interested in random individual opinions as such; we could include John Norman's rebuttal, or Pat Calafia's rebuttal (in the preface to the new printing of "Imaginative Sex"), or similar sourceable and somewhat prominent defenses of the books -- but your own personal rebuttal, as an expression of your personal opinions, cannot be included... AnonMoos (talk) 00:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)