User talk:Paulverhulst

File permission problem with File:Justin Prime Press Picture 2014.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Justin Prime Press Picture 2014.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sickindividuals


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sickindividuals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 17:55, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sick Individuals


A tag has been placed on Sick Individuals requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 17:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The usual criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia is explained here. Very basically, we only summarise information that's already published in reliable sources that're independent of the subject. We do this to ensure both that our information is verifiable, and that it can be written neutrally. If you have any questions, please ask. Cheers, Wily D 19:57, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi [User:WilyD|Wily]], is this the right way to answere you? I don't know Wikipedia so good right now. You write that everything should be summarized. But also just a biography explaining who the peolpe are? I'm part of the management of the Sick Individuals and Justin Prime. Both pages are going to be deleted.. :( i was wondering what i can do to make them stay on Wikipedia? Kind regards, and thanks for helping me out.Paulverhulst (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * See my note at the article talk page. Dralwik&#124;Have a Chat 21:50, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, an encyclopaedia is a summary of what's known. Given the collaborative nature of Wikipedia, we summarise what's published in other sources, giving those sources, so that readers and other editors can verify the information for themselves.  The inclusion standard is slightly different - we only have articles about subjects where reliable publishers, who are independent of the subject, have written about it.  Otherwise it's impossible to write a neutral article, and one of the fundamental principles of Wikipedia is that article's are written from a neutral point of view. Wily D  14:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I suggest you also read the Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. The gist of it is, don't write or edit pages about your clients. If they're notable enough to be included in Wikipedia, then articles will likely be written about them at some point by others. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 15:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Oke, and the way we have this conversation.. Is that the normal way? Is it true the talk page is a kind of forum linked on an article? Thanks for your replies.


 * No, talk pages aren't supposed to be used as forums, but places to have discussions related to developing an article/resolving disputes about the content, that sort of thing. General discussion not related to the actual building/maintaining of the discussion is generally removed. Wily D  16:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Oke, because i haven't found the 'send private message' jet. Or doesn't that exist in here?


 * Some individuals can be emailed (on their user/user talk page, look under "tools", but in general it's not possible. Most things should be public.  (Also, you ought to end your comments with ~, which'll produce a signature, making conversations easier to follow. Wily D  16:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sick Individuals. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Removal of notability and third-party tags from an article with only affiliated sources is not acceptable. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 18:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Proposed deletion of Justin Prime


The article Justin Prime has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability of this artist is not established, the only sources being affiliated with the subject. Searching GNews only turns up routine coverage of a song release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 18:28, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Moved to userspace
I've moved the article to your userspace at User:Paulverhulst /Sick Individuals. Offhand, the biggest issue seems to be a lack of coverage in reliable sources such as news articles and reviews in other WP:RS. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:22, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sick individuals press picture.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sick individuals press picture.jpg, which you've attributed to. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 21:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:StadiumX.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:StadiumX.jpg, which you've attributed to Reinier Dike from TTTManagement. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 16:07, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. 5 albert square (talk) 22:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC)