User talk:Paulzeroes

Paid editing?
Hello Paulzeroes. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Paulzeroes. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 21:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * It is true. I receive money from the company ZeroBounce which I was attempting to write an article about.


 * Please do as recommended above and place the Paid template, as instructed, on your talk page, in place of the sentence you have written there, prior to editing any articles. Thanks--Quisqualis (talk) 22:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * My goal if I go forward is to be as objective as possible and report only the facts. May I ask, human to human, if I write this article do you believe it has a chance?


 * I looked at a few pages of Google results for the company. There was almost nothing to be found that was a reliable source. Social media, PR, competitors...It doesn't seem that the company has been written about much in reliable sources. In fact, Wikipedia only has one article on Email authentication, and it's very technical. I believe that an article about ZeroBounce, or, most likely, about most other firms in that line of business, would not be possible, given the lack of sources to demonstrate notabililty. That's my honest estimation.--Quisqualis (talk) 02:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for the feedback. I appreciate it a lot. ZeroBounce was named #40 on the Inc. 5000 list of the fastest growing companies in America.
 * Here are a few of the sources I was planning to use: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/311153
 * https://www.inc.com/profile/zerobounce
 * https://thesiliconreview.com/magazine/profile/the-leader-in-email-validation-spam-trap-and-abuse-detection-zerobounce-a-santa-barbara-based-start-up-plans-to-expand-product-offerings


 * See how the colons indent each post? You can sign and timestamp with a simple  ~  (4 tildes).
 * I'm about to turn in for the night. Will check yr sources out tomorrow.--Quisqualis (talk) 05:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020: Adding links to your own work is considered to be spamming
When a Wikipedia editor uses media which they control (THE PAUL LESLIE HOUR) to source their edits, it qualifies as "linkspam" Hello, I'm Quisqualis. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. --Quisqualis (talk) 02:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Songs You Don't Know by Heart
Hello, Paulzeroes. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Songs You Don't Know by Heart, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Songs You Don't Know by Heart


Hello, Paulzeroes. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Songs You Don't Know by Heart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)