User talk:Pavankdas

July 2014
Hello, I'm Sam Sailor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ultimate Spider-Man because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sam Sailor Sing 13:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Trials-of-appolo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Trials-of-appolo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Your new article The Trials of Apollo (series)
Hi there, Pavankdas, I'm here from WP:RRTF. First off, I'd like to thank you for your ambitious creation of an article! Our offer of membership still stands, if you're interested.

Unfortunately, there are a few things I need to let you know. To begin with, in its current state your article is a candidate for speedy deletion because of its lack of references (particularly non-primary sources). References and a larger real-world reception section are needed to help establish notability, one of the most important qualities of a good Wikipedia article. In addition, there is already a page called The Trials of Apollo (a redirect) -- making the name "The Trials of Apollo (series)" a poor title for an article.

The reason there is a redirect in place right now is that very little on The Trials of Apollo has been published. barely enough to establish notability, and most certainly not enough to provide the needed references to support information. It is inappropriate to create a Wikipedia article that can't provide useful, 100% true, and well-supported facts.

Besides thay, Wikipedia recommends all new articles be created through AFC: there are much fewer redundant or poor-quality articles that way. The AFC's article wizard allows users to search for other articles on their topic (which can also be done using the everything option on Wikipedia's search bar), and also gives them the option of making a draft or using their sandbox to prep the article. Drafts are then reviewed by a team similarly to how Good-quality articles are selected. In the future, I would recommend you use this method to create a new article, as the notability, referencing, and quality issues would be addressed before the general public has access to a potentially untrustworthy source of information.

I encourage you to see our forum post about your article, and to work to improve your own. Please be aware that we or other editors may edit or otherwise influence your article, and it is by no means a comment on you or your abilities. Thanks so much for taking the initiative! If you need to contact me, leave a message on either the RRTF forum or my personal talk page. Happy editing! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 20:30, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Rowley jefferson


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Rowley jefferson. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Rowley Jefferson. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Rowley Jefferson – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Nat Gertler (talk) 14:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Trials of Apollo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Trials of Apollo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:17, 3 September 2016 (UTC)