User talk:Pave69

I reverted your edit to Bell's theorem because the link you provided failed to deliver on my computer. Bell's theorem has been extensively discussed, and it will take more than one expert to convince me that there is something new here.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 18:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

a reference
de la Peña, L., Cetto, A.M., Brody, T.A. (1972). On hidden-variable theories and Bell's inequality, Lettere al Nuovo Cimento, 5(2): 177–181.Chjoaygame (talk) 21:07, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * My favorite refutation of the logic of Bell's theorem is the tongue-in-cheek Bell Theorem Negative Probabilities His other essay, Bell's Theorem Easy Math verifies that he really understands Bell's theorem. Every other article I have seen is incomprehensible to me, and therefore IHMO should be classified as "research" and not suitable for Wikipedia.  What would be worthy is a Wikipedia article on "Bell's theorem denialism", but we would need a more neutral title.  I am 99% certain that such an article will present ample evidence that most physicists who have looked at it have concluded that Bell's theorem is fundamentally correct...(well maybe only 90% certain).--Guy vandegrift (talk) 01:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * My post was a suggestion for reading for the owner of this talk page, not for posting in Wikipedia. If I were proposing posting in Wikipedia, I would have done so elsewhere. As Editor Guy vandegrift knows, I do not try to post in Wikipedia on this topic. Of course I don't intend to try to debate it here.Chjoaygame (talk) 07:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Understood.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 10:28, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelca's model of spin (April 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kelca's model of spin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kelca%27s_model_of_spin Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bradv&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kelca%27s_model_of_spin reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bradv 03:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)