User talk:Pavel Vozenilek/Archive3

Ethiopia
Thanks for your message. I've added some extra detail and provided a link to an ICRC report about the use of mustard gas. More to follow. FaulenzerUser_talk:Faulenzer 14:36, August 01, 2005 (MEZ)

Canderson7's RFA
Thanks for the support of my RFA and for your advice therein, I really appreciate it! --Canderson7 17:03, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Actors
Thanks for your message, I replied ;) Wyss 23:39, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

World Dictators
Dear Pavel,

I'm sorry you think my web site about the World's Dictators in 2005 (http://www.arthuredelstein.org/worlddictators) is of low quality. Do you have suggestions on how I can improve it, and what would make it worthy of inclusion in the Wikipedia Dictator Page?

Arthur

Re: Karlovy Vary
Pavel, I understand and do agree with you. Although I did not write the part about the mafia, I will edit my peice on ownership of infrastructure. Thank you for your careful comments and corrections. -Igor

Ah yes, changed a bit on the Karlovy Vary page, I'm not exactly sure what you were trying to say about the mafia in the city. If you could please explain more to me, or make the changes you feel should be there, I would appreciate it. Thank You Pavel--Igor 05:26, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Links

 * are mostly wiki mirrors, SqueakBox 03:23, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

See Mirror (computing), SqueakBox 18:14, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

Basically if I have a site with very few links and I want to increase it's link popularity to get it higher up a google etc search and I put it at wikipedia's IP address 30 or more duplicates will soon appear, each linking to my site, + that's 30 sites from whicvh someone will potentially link through to my site. Which beats making masses of blogs, etc, as an easy way to gain good visibility for one's site. See Google bomb, SqueakBox 20:07, August 2, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for your support on my RfA! When I submitted it, I was unsure of how I'd do, but the support was great. I promise that I won't do anything too stupid with the trust you've given me. humblefool&reg;Deletion Reform 19:51, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * P.S. Stop by Deletion reform!

Byšičky
I believe that it is actually a village, though it is part of Lysa. In English a village does not always have a seperate political identity. Check out this page - It identifies it as both a village and part of Lysa:

Popis části obce Byšičky

http://www.senat.cz/volby/hledani/o_casti_obce.php?kod=89648

I think that it deserves its own page - even though politically it is Lysa. I rode my bike there from Kareny and it was surrounded by countryside, not obviously part of Lysa, but a seperate settlement. There should be a link on the Lysa page to Byšičky, though.

Elizabeth

Fixed link to your archives
The link to your most recent archive actually pointed to your first archive. I've fixed it. JesseW 00:28, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Failed Edits Problem
I was browsing a forum in which a number of Wikipedians were discussing the failed edit problem. And I think that I have the solution.

From what I understand, the problem could result from human error. Many people, when editing, have a number of windows open on an article. They enter an edit to one window, and then, without refreshing their browser, edit that same page again, negating the original edit with their save....

Hope this helps, --jonasaurus 21:49, 5 August 2005 (UTC)

Yeah. You're right actually about it's prevalence. It's quite ironic that it happened to me while I was posting about it. Don't you think? --jonasaurus 22:28, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

Got your note
Pavel,

Thanks for the note. I meant no harm by posting the link to the TaxAlmanac.org site. Jimmy Wales, was kind enough, to spend time with our development team last April as we created this Wiki site. He even directed the Time magazine author of "It's a Wiki, Wiki World" to us and we were featured in Time's June 6, 2005 edition.

TaxAlmanac is the only free online resource of its kind dedicated to tax research and is the only free site that contains an updated US Internal Revenue code (the IRS.gov site was last updated in 2002). I posted the link where I thought others that had interest in tax might find extremely useful.

I understand very deeply what Wikipedia is trying to do and again appreciate your guidance. I can assure you, I meant no harm.

Best regards,

BeTheBest 03:13, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Dune quote
Just a minor note: Dune was already linked before I corrected the quote (from my 20th anniversary edition of Dune), and it is important to link to Catholic if only so the reader can judge for himself why the OC Bible has the word 'catholic' in it. Now if only I could figure out the 'Orange' bit... --Maru 05:10, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for voting on my RfA
Hi, Thanks for voting on my RfA. Having been elected, I hope to justify your faith in me. Thanks again. --Ragib 05:41, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Intuit page
I don't think the description of TaxAlmanac can be considered spam. It is a genuine offering from Intuit, and therefore relevant to this page. IMO, your reversion should itself be reverted. - Rlw (Talk) 11:39, August 7, 2005 (UTC)

Your SPAM report
Dear Pavel Vozenilek, I would strongly suggest you to look at the link before calling it a SPAM. If you would have done it you would realise that they link to NON-COMMERCIAL web site which contains ARTICLES about the PROBLEMS IN CONTEXT (e.g. Advice on thesis writing), therefore Wiki readers would, if fact, benefit from reading these materials. Moreover, I have received WRITTEN PERMISSIONS from the AUTHORS of these articles to reprint them, therefore according to the rules of Wikipedia this material CAN NOT be published on Wikidepia as they are not PUBLIC DOMAIN RESOURCES. This is why I provided links for them. By deleting these links you have closed opportunities for many people to find the information they need. Is that the purpose of Wikipedia? And just to remind you once again: This is a non-commercial web site - I do not sell anything and neither I display advertising - I work to help people and I seriously do not like when someone calls it a SPAM.

Kind Regards Liya Wells

Value to Readers
Pavel,

Again, I am deeply troubled by your assertion that a free, non-commercial link to the only free source which contains the only updated US Internal Revenue tax code would be considered spam and not useful for a variety of readers.

BeTheBest 17:14, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

TaxAlmanac Page
Pavel:

In your note to BeTheBest, you state:


 * Vast majority of people who look into Tax article are quite unlikely to compile source code. It is even possible they are not interested in US taxation system but in more general information. Try to look for more convenient articles, e.g. such that list tax software for the US system. Please not in put TaxAlmanac.or in articles about competing products. (AFAICS Intuit has absolutely nothing in common with it.)

I'll address each of your comments:


 * Vast majority of people who look into Tax article are quite unlikely to compile source code.
 * When BeTheBest was referring to tax code, he was not referring to computer compiled code, but instead to the tax law (referred to in the United States as the tax code).


 * It is even possible they are not interested in US taxation system but in more general information.
 * TaxAlmanac.org contains primarily tax information and resources for tax professionals in the United States, but articles have been submitted for other countries as well, such as Canadian Tax and Australian Tax.


 * Try to look for more convenient articles, e.g. such that list tax software for the US system.
 * This site is not a software product at all. It is a Wikipedia style resource for information about tax law, tax law interpretation, etc.


 * Please not in put TaxAlmanac.or in articles about competing products. (AFAICS Intuit has absolutely nothing in common with it.)
 * On the contrary, Intuit has quite a bit in common with it - Intuit created this site. The Intuit logo can be easily seen at the bottom of every page on the site. Intuit has made it available to the tax community at no charge.

I don't see that there is anything wrong with providing a link to this valuable free resource to those interested in performing tax research or to those interested in one of Intuit's newest offerings.

I'll state up front that I am not an uninterested party as I am the 'moderator' on TaxAlmanac.

Tdoyle 21:55, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

The Melchizedek editor
The Melchizedek editor is also trying to add his content to the Melchizedek article. I'll help you open a RFC if he continues to go against consensus, and have all the articles I know he edits on my watchlist. I will revert his edits on sight. Samboy 22:06, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Award
I, Halibutt, would like to thank you for knowing the difference between the Central and Eastern Europe, as well as for maintaining balance and NPOV between the East and us here.... Halibutt 01:27, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

142.176.125.165
I believe he/she's right about changing the dates. I believe that the Presidents' and Vice Presidents' terms end at noon of March 4 (before the 20th Amendment was ratified) or January 20 (after it was ratified).

Also, even if it is wrong, the anon might have his/her facts wrong, but is editing to what he/she thinks to be the right thing. Do not bite those anons; do not scare them away. Thanks. --Lst27 ( t a l k )  21:49, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

overcategorisation
Some categories, like Category:Modern artists are so all-embracing that their value is zero. For example Adolf Born fits into relatively small category of Czech painters but adding supercategory "modern artist" is just noise, not improving quality of the article, IMHO. Thanks for understanding. Pavel Vozenilek 00:30, 12 August 2005 (UTC)


 * I do understand and I find the category useful. >>sparkit| TALK << 03:17, August 12, 2005 (UTC)

Tři oříšky pro Popelku
You are very welcome. It seems you are doing a lot of the same work. Rl 06:32, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Requesting assistance in handling disruptive behavior.
Hi Pavel, I would greatly appreciate if you look into the mess created in the article Rohingya. This is quite an interesting issue; a few months ago, I removed the copyvio and then organized the article into sections and cleaned up the links. For some reason, several anon editors in the block 212.138.47.* seem to take offence at my "touching" "their" article, and started vandalizing my user/talk pages. Some of these vandals were blocked by other admins.

Last week, these vandals created several sockpuppet accounts, including. You can see from the account name what its purpose was. The user vandalized my user/talk pages besides leaving abusive comments. The user was blocked immediately.

Yesterday and today, there has been a parade of sockpuppets all directed at either launching personal attacks, or avoiding 3RR. You can find several incoherent rants in Talk:Rohingya, my talk (User talk:Ragib and Mel's talk User talk:Mel Etitis. The language constructs and the irrational attitude ("how-dare-I-touch-their-article-being-a-Bengali" etc) points out a single user behind all these.

I find the following accounts as sockpuppets of the same vandal from the ip block 212.138.47.*



I urge everyone to take a look at the page history, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rohingya&curid=1918632&action=history. This is not even a dispute over content! I have not added or deleted any content other than the initial copyvio. I simply organized the article with sections, and cleaned up the external links. One of the links point to a blog, which the vandals ferociously object to as being termed a blog. I've gotten literally tired of the abuse these vandals launched on me. The level of racial and personal abuse is quite hard to take. Since it would be a conflict of interest in my part to take actions against these vandals, I would request you to look into this issue and decide.

Thanks a lot. --Ragib 13:14, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Garry Kasparov incident
That newspaper isn't a tabloid, it's a political newspaper with a strong anti-Putin bent. The publication was a letter the police officers sent to Kasparov in response to his demand for a criminal investigation, so Kasparov himself brought attention to the matter, forwarding the letter to that specific newspaper. I think the fact that Kasparov demanded an investigation over something as trivial and then decided to publish that letter illustrates his character, his overreaction is more newsworthy than the incident himself.

But, if that incident is deemed not significant enough for Wikipedia, then the mention of another incident when he was hit by the chessboard in Moscow in 2005 should be deleted as well. There's no significant difference between the two cases.

Brarabooh 03:26, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Re: TOCright
Hi! My reasoning for using TOCright on ABC was that it was a disambiguation page &mdash; a list of links, and therefore should be made as short as possible vertically (though without using multiple columns for the links). Also, being a list of links, it would not disturb the flow of the page. Therefore, in my humble opinion, there was reasonable grounds to use TOCright.

The Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) advises the use of TOCright on dab pages, though I admit it is still young and may not reflect everything with absolute perfection yet, but in my opinion TOCright should be used on dab pages. Rest assured I don't use TOCright whenever, wherever &mdash; I did have grounds to use it on ABC. I hope you'll consider the use of TOCright on that page. User talk:Neonumbers/Neonumbers 06:16, 13 August 2005 (UTC)


 * In any case, on Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), it is quite clear that TOCright should be used on disambiguation pages, and there is no dispute about this. I don't know about other situations; I can think of few times where it would be useful except this &mdash; but please be aware that whatever discussions may be wherever, the disambiguation pages manual still likes TOCright.
 * I don't mean to make a big deal over one TOC on one page &mdash; though I do hope TOCright would be used on ABC, where I think it would be of good use &mdash; but I'm not trying to make a big fuss about it and I'm not bothered to change it until that manual's been in place for a while longer. Neonumbers 07:23, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

"Italo-Ethiopian War of 1936 sources", posted by kinneyboy90
Dear Pavel,

I have had many sources for the reason that Ethiopia had only 100,000 men. I read a book by an editor, an Encyclopedia on World War II, and then a website. I am most definately sure that Ethiopia only mobilized about 100,000 soldiers in that war, and I am considering only the appropriately equipped regular army soldiers, not the ones with spears. Refer below for my sources on this topic.

Sincerely,

Aaron Kinney aka "kinneyboy90"

Source
OnWar, Online Military history

České Budějovice and Plzeň (Again)
Nazdar Pavel - after a month of quiet NoPuzzleStranger is back to unilateral edits in both articles. It's the foreign name references again. For reasons that are completely unclear, he is deliberately singling out those two articles.

Either way, I'm not going to engage in a senseless edit war, something he seems to revel in and thrive on. My last request for mediation fizzed out with no effect. Do you think I could go straight for arbitration then?

Would you know an admin interested in Czech towns? Are you familiar with the Gdansk Vote? I posted there too and it seems that NoPuzzleStranger's grudge (or whatever it is) goes back to that edit war, but he seems to respect the results of the vote there. There might not be enough interest, but any chance we could get a vote on uniform German name reference for all towns of former Czechoslovakia? Ahoj Jbetak 18:37, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

Just a remark: If NoPuzzleStranger is identical with the former user Wik (I hope I remember the name well), who had exactly the same behaviour (and could be recognized by his "antipathy" against the word Czechia and no communication with the users), I see a very low chance of any success, since he seems to outlive here anything like a loch ness...Juro 00:05, 15 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Thank you both for your help! You might be intrigued to hear that NoPuzzleStranger has been permanently banned. I can empathize with Juro's assessment though: he'll surely be back. Jbetak 20:41, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Article with invalid name
Page like Prague - Å½iÅ¾kov Television Tower cannot be referenced from outside (impossible to enter such name in address box). Such page was created in old times when UTF8 support was not available but someone tried to use non-Latin1 alphabet anyway. Redirects are cheap but such clearly wrong names are pretty annoying. I am trying to clean up Wikipedia from these mistakes and would welcome help in this. Pavel Vozenilek 02:06, 15 August 2005 (UTC)


 * No, that page can be referenced from anywhere, just like any other page. To prove it, see, which I just put up.  dbenbenn | talk 04:25, 15 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Well, theoretically it may be referenced but no human will do it (and Google shows no links here). Even someone with a Central Europe ISO encoding of text will reach the page with correct dicritics, not the mangled one. I wonder whether cleanup of such clearly wrong page needs to be such complicated. Pavel Vozenilek 17:01, 15 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The page is not "clearly wrong". If you really want it deleted, you can always make a request at WP:RFD, though the redirect in question doesn't satisfy the conditions listed under "When should we delete a redirect?" (It actually satisfies 3 of the criteria listed there for keeping.)  dbenbenn | talk 00:42, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Negroid
Is this good enough?

http://www.wku.edu/~darlene.applegate/forensic/lab7/lab7.html

PiccoloNamek 04:59, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

rv spamlink
Hi Pavel. Why did you remove some photos links (Milton Friedman, Vilfredo Pareto, ...)? It's not smpalinks! It is a good collection of photographies. Please look at them attentively.

VdgR 16:59, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

Many Thanks
Thanks for supporting my RFA. It couldn't have happened without your effort. FeloniousMonk 17:23, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hiya. Just wanted to thank you for supporting my recent RfA. Cheers! --Ngb 18:48, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

Admins quality
You are too kind. Yes, I'd be interested. Rl 07:11, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Thx. Rl 18:44, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Thx again :-). Rl 09:16, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * One last time: Thank you for your support. Keep up the good work! Rl 09:04, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

Usercat
You were listed in the Wikipedians/Czech Republic page as living in or being associated with Czech Republic. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Czech Republic for instructions.Rmky87 08:48, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

supposed spamlinks
Pavel, Although I appreciate your editing of various pages for content and spam, the external links I added were not a part of some scheme, and after reading through the list of what Wikipedia is not, I don't believe my additions are any sort of violation. The pages that I linked to are non-partisan and are purely non-profit research tools that I have found to be quite helpful when researching numerous topics. Please let me know what your specific problem with them was so that I can add to Wikipedia in the future. Thanks.

Thanks
Thank you for your kind words on my talk page, they were much appreciated! I'll try to keep up the good work :-) Soltak 00:16, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Lizzy Bardsley
Pavel, save yourself the trouble of making a VfD entry. Lizzy Bardsley is a minor celebrity in the UK, recognisable to the general public. She has had a fair amount of newspaper coverage. Sometimes, contestants on the most dreary television shows gain a wider note, and she's one of them. Clair de Lune 00:18, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

Přemysl
You had removed valid interwiki links to 4 or 5 Wikipedias by some accident. I put them back. Pavel Vozenilek 03:53, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


 * These links went to the articles about the Přemyslids, as the whole dynasty. I have moved them to Přemyslid dynasty, and replaced them with the link to Přemysl der Pflüger, which is about Přemysl himself. -- Naive cynic 08:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Hmm, in this case many of links currently pointing to Přemysl should be rerouted to Přemyslid dynasty. Woul you take care of these please? Pavel Vozenilek 00:17, 20 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Ok, I've fixed them. -- Naive cynic 11:14, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

February 26
Reason for removing link to Vinayak Damodar Savarkar?

You wrote (paraphrased) - no article linked.

I followed up - Added link to article. Thanks for your interest.

Response to your warning
I do participate in Wikipedia, I just don't always log in. I tend to brush up the spelling and grammar on pages that I come across, contribute links, and contribute to wikinews (for example I was the created the stub about the IRA declaring that it would disarm - the IP address there is my one). I only log in to do this occasionally, and did not register as a user solely to vote. I certainly did not vote in it just as a joke, and I take wikipedia very seriously. - Graius

Musical instrument/ensemble external links
Hey Pavel, your work to keep wikipedia spam-free is a thankless but extremely important effort. But the price you pay for being a spamcop is that occasionally you remove some "High content pages that contain neutral and accurate material not already in the article". I believe that's the case with the links I added to some musical instrument/ensemble/composer pages -- links to a public broadcasting site containing complete classical works in streaming audio and thorough supporting information. For example, is it relevant to link from a gamelan orchestra article to a site where you can hear an actual gamelan orchestra perform? Or from an article about a composer to a site where you can hear pieces by the composer? I believe so.

RE: What to link
Hey, thanks for the note. I try not to be redundant with links, so if I was it's just out of carelessness which isn't a good thing either. So I'll try to be more careful with that to see if the term has already been linked. Also, I see what you mean with the dates, it doesn't make too much sense linking them all. Thanks again. Sorna Doon 07:13, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

what is spamlink? why forbid adding something useful?
Pavel,

if there is a policy against adding user forum links to SuperCollider page, that's fine. but why do you label my addition as linkspam? Spam means adding something irrelevant. this SuperCollider user forum http://www.nabble.com/SuperCollider-f2891.html is highly relevant to the SuperCollider site and users. If you look a bit closer, the forum is a combined searchable archive+forum, it's a useful 3rd-party tool to the SuperCollider users and site. Why forbid adding things useful?

also, may I ask what's the value of this link here: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?SuperCollider - it's a repeat of SuperCollider, what value does it bring to the SuperCollider users? plus, it's a commercial site (c2.com sells consulting service).

In any case, if you are the judge here, you can remove my addition. but please don't label it as spam - after all, we all hate spams.

--Audiolo 08:18, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Answered on Audiolo's Talk page. Pavel Vozenilek 15:26, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Johnny Tyldesley
Hi Pavel, thanks for the note. I've had a look in the obvious places the article might have been copied from (Wisden, Cricinfo) and not turned up anything -- I'll mention it to the other WikiProject Cricket members, though, since there are a couple of possible sources I don't have copies of. --Ngb 17:31, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page
Hi Pavel, thanks for your message on my talk page, and for your offer. I have been thinking about adminship lately, so I would appriciate a nomination. Regards, Martg76 03:58, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'll be travelling next weekend and don't know whether I'll have web access, but Sunday should be fine. Martg76 04:15, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Are you honest?
If you are truly honest, you must admit that you are violating the Wikipedia policy by adding statements like "It was suggested that..." If you have some PROOF that Roma have in early times practised some form of Hinduism, please PROVIDE the RELIABLE sources, otherwise, don't mislead people with UN-SCIENTIFIC statetments! If you don't like that Roma are NOT HINDU and HAVE NEVER BEEN, there's nothing we can do for you, as we don't intend to adopt such religion.

HappyCamper's RFA - Thanks for your support! :-)
Hi Pavel! Thanks for supporting me during my recent RFA. I'm now an administrator, and I wanted to thank you for voicing your confidence in me. You wrote one of the more meaningful comments I have received since being here at Wikipedia: ...looks like [a] qualified and knowledgeable editor, participates in Wikipedia discussions, deals with vandals, edit summaries, ... etc. Thanks for your work... - I'm grateful for your generosity and sincerity. I hope we'll get a chance in the future to collaborate on an article or otherwise. Let me know what your interests are!

As an aside, I cannot help but wonder if we have ever met before in real life, since your name sounds so familiar to me. I'm curious, have you lived in the Czech Republic all your life?

Anyway, thanks again for your support! See you around the Wiki! --HappyCamper 18:09, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

Blansko
Ahoj Pavel, take a look at my Blansko page in the italian wikipedia. I can translate it to english if you find it interesting. I'm not registered here, leave me a message in .it Ciao Alberto

IP address
Could you take a look at the latest goings on at IP address, SqueakBox 12:26, August 28, 2005 (UTC)


 * What does this mean SqueakBox ? Also, what does it mean Pavel? 0waldo 21:37, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Edmund Charaszkiewicz
Thanks for your suggestion of more work on the "Edmund Charaszkiewicz" article. I've revised it (please see its Discussion page). Do you have any questions or specific suggestions to improve it further? logologist 18:57, 5 September 2005 (UTC)

Spam filter
Wikipedia has a spam filter that's used as a last resort when there is a lot of linkspam for sites at a particular website or hosting service. In this case, host.sk probably hosts a bunch of useful sites and a few spam sites, and somebody added it to the spam filter.

If host.sk is in the spam filter, no one can edit the page as long as that link stays there. I wanted to edit the page but wasn't able to until I removed that link.

Contact User:Silsor if you want to inquire about why host.sk was added to the spam filter, he's usually knowledgeable about that. I don't know and didn't have anything to do with it. -- Curps 23:28, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Spam filter
Wikipedia has a spam filter that's used as a last resort when there is a lot of linkspam for sites at a particular website or hosting service. In this case, host.sk probably hosts a bunch of useful sites and a few spam sites, and somebody added it to the spam filter.

If host.sk is in the spam filter, no one can edit the page as long as that link stays there. I wanted to edit the page but wasn't able to until I removed that link.

Contact User:Silsor if you want to inquire about why host.sk was added to the spam filter, he's usually knowledgeable about that. I don't know and didn't have anything to do with it. -- Curps 23:29, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Haley Eclipse or ECLiPSe
I was the one that added the reference to ECLiPSe with a link to its website before I changed it to a reference to Haley Eclipse with a link to Haley's website; I didn't link to a more specific page from that website because I wasn't able to navigate through the site with my browser. Before I added the original link, there was just a reference to some project named "Eclipse", which I assumed to be ECLiPSe just because I couldn't find anymore projects named "Eclipse" that better resembled CLIPS. That was until I found some other page relating a "Haley Eclipse" to CLIPS. After that I read that Haley Eclipse is (or was), like CLIPS, an expert system, which ECLiPSe isn't, and then realized that Haley Eclipse was probably the "Eclipse" that was originally referred to. I just learned, though, that Haley Eclipse is no more; It was substituted by "Haley Rules", I believe. By using a browser that can actually navigate the site I also learned that you have to be a registered user to access the pages describing Haley's products; that kind of restricts the link to point only to the company's website, I guess. Since you probably have more experience in editing than I do, I won't alter anything; instead I'll ask your opinion about what should be done. Thanks. -- User:200.217.92.14 11:35, 10 September (GMT)

Thank you!
Thank you for replacing my comment in Talk:Roma people! Much appreciated. :) -- Ashenai 17:06, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Re: your reply -- I'll be glad to keep an eye on the page. I can't claim to be an expert on the subject, but then, the vandalism isn't exactly subtle. Cheers! --Ashenai 17:24, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

external links vs. link
IMO links should be used all the time. But see this page. I also remember someone having a project (but unfortunately can't seem to locate it now) to go through all articles and to make sure every one had "external links" even if there was one link, so using external link reduces consistency from the goals of this project chowells 18:48, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

Kunětice Mountain and Castle
Pavel: Thanks for fixing the Kunětice Mountain and Kunětice Mountain Castle articles. Take a look at the pictures in the two external links on the Kunětice Mountain Castle article. I put those links there, but now that I look closely, I see that they don't seem to be pictures of the same place. Perhaps the pictures on the first link really show Pardubice Castle? If so, then probably the first link should be eliminated. In any case, you would probably have a better idea than I would. Also: The new map image you placed on Kunětice Mountain Castle shows a different location from the map image on Kunětice Mountain. I imagine the mountain and the castle are in the same place, so one of those pictures must be wrong. But I don't know which one. By the way, if you need to reply, you can go ahead and do so here; I'll watch this page for a few days. &mdash; Nowhither 01:13, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Alfons Mucha template
The tag on the Alfons Mucha page is actually a marker that the Russian version of the article was a featured article on the Russian Wikipedia. It should show up as a little orange star just next to the interwiki link. I suppose that if the image wasn't there, all you'd see is an indented link. If the image didn't show up for you, I would suggest either that you have your "automatically load images" option turned off, or that your browser merely failed to load the image. Hitting "refresh" on your browser would probably reload it.

Other than that, I can't think of a reason why you wouldn't be able to see the star. Micro tonal ... (Put your head on my shoulder) 03:17, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Population transfer postWW2 or so called "expulsion of Germans"
The whole article is a mess actually.First of all see that Germans are called "expelled" in the article while Poles, Ukrainians are "resettled"-which seems to biased, because why the change in naming when faced with different etnic group ? Then you have the sentence that Germans were "killed" and estimated numbers.This also wrong since there never was any confirmation of the killings of all those people.No doubt some were killed, but the sentence ignores the fact of widespread famine and diseases in the time.Another point-the article in my opinion should be merged into one called Population Transfer in Nazi Occupied Europe, because you can't escape connecting it to other expulsions and population transfers(simply because some of the people settled by Reich are counted as expelled).They are other errors that result in POV, for example the sentence German property and land was confiscated.It gives impression that Germans were singled out, but ALL people had their property and land confiscated by communist government. --Molobo 17:22, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

New Czech town articles
Thanks for the kind words! I like to learn about the smaller cities and towns from throughout central Europe, but a lot of the time there is not much information about them available in English. Usually I translate from the German wiki, but many of those articles aren't terribly detailed either. Are there any decent-sized Czech towns that do not at least have stubs yet? Olessi 21:55, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

Jizerá River
I saw "Jizerá" on the German Wiki and assumed it was correct; I have since fixed it at Iser. I'm going to fix all of the links I have been "correcting". Sorry! Olessi 00:05, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I have mentioned it at Requested moves. Once again, I apologize for the extra trouble. Also, I am considering making an article for Rožmberk nad Vltavou- would that be better described as a castle, town, or village? Olessi 00:25, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Emilia Plater
Pavle, it doesn't matter that you created the article. You DO NOT own it! (Contrary to what you believe). I would love to sit down and explain to you the very detailed reasons why I repeatedly reverted the name of the city, but judging by the level presented in your comments, those reasons would be way over your head. Also I would appreciate if you bought youself a mannequin and insult and patronize him instead of me. With me I would like you to take more caution in your tone and save your primitive insinuations for somebody else (your mother, with all due respect, for example). In closing I would like to assure you of a great patience I have for (God's) creatures like you. However even that patience has limits. So your uncalled for name calling will get reported sooner or later and you might get blocked. Truly Yours, Space Cadet 23:34, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Jaroslav Hašek
Thankyou very much, nice to know someone's reading the stuff I write. :) Rje 16:26, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

User:131.109.1.250
This user has continued to vandalize after your warning, and another person's. S/he defaced the main star wars page as seen in its history. Thanks. The Wookieepedian 13:42, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Chodov
Thanks Pavel... I was staying in a hotel there last week and enjoyed finding one or two more interesting buildings. But I think I hadn't got the postal district information quite right - I have just found the excellent Prague districts page and I will correct it in the light of information there. seglea 21:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Eastern vs. Central Europe
I have reverted several of your edits. In the English language Eastern Europe is the standard term for the nations behind the Iron Curtain. - SimonP 02:30, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I am well aware of the current debates over terminology. There have recently been some very interesting works about how the Western conception of "Eastern Europe" developed, and also many criticisms of the idea of "Eastern Europe", however this does not change the fact that calling a region central Europe that almost everybody knows as Eastern Europe will only confuse readers. Especially in Cold War studies Eastern Europe universally refers to the Eastern Bloc. - SimonP 02:42, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

Question
Well I understand what you mean, but wouldn't more stubs on an article increase it's chances of getting expanded? However if you still think the extra stubs should be removed, what stub should I leave? Or would you like me to put a instead? Happy editing! Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ]  00:37, 11 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I guess your right about it spilling over from another Wikipedia, until then I'll leave it the way it is.

Happy editing! Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ]  02:25, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

New Engineering Wiki
Engineering Wiki is a wiki entirely dedicated to collecting information about Engineering. I invite you to join this wiki.

Lida Baarova
Ahoj Pavle, Thank you for your kind words and your support. Best Wishes, David Cruise 21:19, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

DOM Page
I read your comment on Centauri's page, in which you said "Melchizedek should be limited to article of its own and not to pollute other, innocent and valid articles." I couldn't agree with you more!

I'm in the process of trying to delete some of the articles that he has added that push the DOM idea. Here are the links to the pages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Ecclesiastical_government Solkope David Even Pedley

If you would vote to delete on Ecclesiastical Government and Solkope and vote to delete or delete and merge on David Even Pedley, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks Davidpdx 13:22, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Czech stuff stubs
I suppose your message was meant as a kind of invitatation to give you a hand with that idea... I'd like to help you and generally spend much more time on helping such an amazing project as Wikipedia is. However, I haven't been able to find much time for Wikipedia recently. What I'd like to do would be to provide more pictures of Czech locations (I promised myself to take some snaps of Prague, the photos there are real bad ... shouldn't be such a problem when I live in Prague, but I've somehow never taken many pictures here ...) And I'd rather write some good texts to the articles rather than just creating stubs ... but I see that opening a stub might be a good way to encourage people to add a bit of information too.

Anyway, I don't like saying I don't have the time .. it's all about priorities. I'd like to help you with the project you mentioned, probably to create a stub plus adding some basic data into an Infobox. Do you have any priorities how to procede? All Czech regions have their pages (I guess I started some of them once), do all districts (okresy) have their entries? Though I'm still not sure about their relevance these days.) Would you like me to work on some regions preferably or go systematically down the administrative categories? Good idea might be to create a resource page with links to useful sites where anyone looking for data to use in a new entry migh find them? — Caroig 19:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Together with User:GrafZahl we improved the Template:Infobox Town template so that it handle most situations when some data is unavailable (it prints NA instead), thus all extra templates (noC etc.) are now redundant, furthermore I wrote a small PHP script which can convert old style infobox to the new one, keepeing all the data. It has a small database of coordinates + elevation data which it is can automatically add to the template. You can find all this on Czech Resources. –Caroig 18:43, 23 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The problem with the statistics site is that it is only in Czech, hardly useful on English Wikipedia, the link can be in the External Links section. There's another site: which contains more useful data, overviews of towns/villages in region etc., unfortunatelly neither that one has an English version (only an English summary). There are nice maps on this site (e.g. ) - are you aware of the copyright status of works created by the Czech government, in US all such material is Public Domain (Wikipedia uses satellite images by NASA or maps by CIA)?. I managed to find an astronomical table (free for download at ) which constains possibly all Czech sites and their coordinates, I'll try to put on a script, which would retrieve them in a Wikipedia ready format.

Solkope
Hello again! Hey I was wondering if you'd be willing to watch the article about Solkope as well as look at the talk page. There is a lot of pushing DOM over there. If you could chip in your two cents, I'd appreciate it.

vandalism Bovinae
I try it once again here: on the page Bovinae there is a vandalism I guess, have a look there, -jkb- 08:50, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Rolodex.jpg
Can you please add an appropriate image copyright tag to Image:Rolodex.jpg uploaded by you? Thanks! -- Paddu 15:41, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Usability article cleanup
Several people have lately improved the copy of usability and I'd like to see that the cleanup gets finished. Could you list any yet unaddressed reasons for the request, or tasks you think should be done. Aapo Laitinen 20:26, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Requests_for_adminship/Halibutt
I think you would be interested in this discussion. It seems that it has caused some stirr and we need more unbiased users to normalize the vote. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 22:27, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Jan Syrovy.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Jan Syrovy.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Agnte 18:11, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Dve sady map
Hi! Is problem because there are two categories on Commons or two sets od maps? I don't speak Czech language. I don't know what is sady. I'm new here and i don't know too much about Commons, categories and all Wiki. Sorry if I did something wrong. This map is my first svg graphic. I agree with You that red dot on blue background is not the best my idea. Please write to me in English. I waiting for Your message. Kroton pl 11:57, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Dve sady map
Sorry that you waited so long for my answer, but I was offline few days. I understand nearly 80 % of Czech language, but there is the problem with the rest. I used Inkscape to draw my map, not GIS program. I imported a bitmap to Inkspace as a pattern, drew a rectangle, modified it manually by adding lots of points and moving them to wanted place to get similar shape to original map. Yes, It's a good idea to create one set of maps for all Czech towns. English, German, Czech and Polish Wikies will have soon articles about all 527 Czech towns. And they will need complete set of maps. What is your proposal? Can you draw all maps? I can draw png as well as svg. I couldn't find empty map without red dot in your set of maps. In png red dot is unmovable, so will be a little work to delete it and draw new one. Can your put on Commons your empty map? Will be a good idea to keep all maps in one category? It will be very hard to browse them. It isn't possible to browse categories by names like Windows folders. Kroton pl 21:37, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Rožmberk Castle
Hello Pavel! I want to let you know that User:Aloysius created an article on Rožmberk Castle that you might find interesting. Olessi 05:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I copyedited and corrected Labe to Vltava. Does this article have any relevance to Rožmberk nad Vltavou or Rožmberk Castle? Olessi 21:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

AfD
Sorry, Pavel, but would you mind voting again at Articles for deletion/Coca-Cola Groups? A vandal (since blocked) removed your vote, and the page history is so screwed up there's no straightforward way to revert it (I'm not sure it matters, since the article will obviously be deleted anyway). Thanks. Chick Bowen 05:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Cool
I think you dealt with User:Bobdabuilda well ("Wikipedia is not dating site"). Sometimes, humor is the best answer. :) --Unforgettableid | talk to me 08:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

German linguists etc
Thanks! Are there categories for linguistic specializations too? I tried adding "Category:Arabic linguists" to Hans Wehr, but it turned red when I previewed. Same thing for "Category:Semitic linguists" and "Category:Semitists". Shouldn't there be categories like this? OT

Multiton example
Hi Pavel. I see that you edited my Multiton contribution.

I'm very confused by the statement that the example is vulnerable to double-checked locking. I'm very familiar with double-checked locking and I'm absolutely positive that it is not used in the example. The entire method body is inside a synchronized block. Double-checked locking would only apply if there was a check outside the synchronized block.

I'm not really asking anything here but I don't want to fix the article to have this comment re-added.

thanks,

Speedy Deletion for User MA
You put up a speedy deletion but don't give a reason why. Reviewing the Speedy deletion guidelines, they recommend you give a reason why. I think I know why, and I have fixed it to redirect to the template, so the page can be deleted. Next time though, you may want to say why, either on the talk page, or the Speedy deletions page.--Azathar 20:41, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Wrongful Assumptions
[In reference to Toilet Paper Soccer (TPS)] I've had my page deleted twice because of wrongful assumptions that its either a test or a joke. Instead, its a true game that a lot of people do in fact play. Please explain your actions in more detail as to how I do not follow the Wikipedia guidelines if this is a real game. --User:IDarkISwordI 17:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC) -- Sorry you feel that way. I think youre a jackass. So your news section is compelte erelevant seeing that theres still news in 2005. There is still news in 2005 isnt there?

Liechtenstein: Fair enough
Thanks for the checking over, sorry if it sounded in anyway 'jokey' or 'patronising' but it was not intentional. Furthermore, referring to me using the page as "a dump for travel books and trivias" is pretty OTT.

But cheers for the comments, and hopefully I will have a chance at not just taking from WikiP but giving as well. ;-)

Nathaniel 17:43, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

User:Tontie
I saw your note on User talk:Tontie. I checked that user's contributions and ended up putting speedy notices on Borane triborane and Kenora Hot Springs and reverting changes on Poncho. They are not really subtle, but they manage to pass at first glace, which may explain why they were not caught before. This user is nothing but trouble. Algae 16:17, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I will if he's trouble again. Algae 22:00, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

prague logo
hi Pavel, thank you for your message. I want to ask you something different: what do you thing about puting the new (modern logo) of Prague next to the old one. I would probably do it, I just don´t know how to work with this kind of charts. I thing it would look better, but I´ll let it up to you;) The new logo is here Szalas

Kadaň
Hello Pavel! Could you take a look at the map for Kadaň? It seems to be a duplication of the map for Chomutov. Olessi 05:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Oki, thanks for the info. I'll be travelling for the holidays and probably won't have much time for WP, but I'll look into the maps in the new year. Olessi 04:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

CfD
Thanks for letting me know. Halibutt 01:28, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Venus cat
Right, please see Talk:Venus of Dolní Věstonice. Cheers, Melchoir 03:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Biofeedback
Swoosh! Like a rocket! It's because I was watching biofeedback. I tried to fix up the poor neurofeedback article the other day, which was like 33% references to pseudoscience and Scientology, but it's an uphill battle.Katsam 08:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Well, I meant "expert" in a loose kind of way. More like "someone who knows something about the subject". Maybe I was wrong to tag it like that: it would just be nice if there were a big, well-sourced, pretty page there. I say so because I would like to read a good encyclopedia article about biofeedback. As far as people writing about themselves (ha ha ha!) I have noticed people trying to sneak links to their own sites in. I guess that's to be expected. I still don't understand how the basic ecology of this place works...Katsam 10:46, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

That list of "beneficial side effects" seems like it comes right out of a commercial. I wonder if the guy would be offended if it were rewritten and taken out of the list format, i.e. "some patients have reported beneficial side effects emerging from their biofeedback treatment, including blah blah blah," but without so much reiteration. What do you think?Katsam 07:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Offense
Dobře, ale tvoje ofensivní poznámky a POV vstupování na Wikipedii tě stály křeslo admina, když jsi kandidoval. Stačí si přečíst poznámky pod "Oppose". Já s tebou tolik nespolupracuji, ale už jsem viděl tvoje POV edity k článkům jako Romové nebo lehce i Český Těšín. Ale to, že jsi hlasoval jako jediný proti mému adminshipu neberu jako to, že ti vadí moje národnost, ale jako svého druhu pomstu za můj "oppose" tvému adminshipu. Btw. nemyslíš, že je z mé strany POV dávat do článků jako Karviná nebo Havířov polskou výslovnost? - Darwinek 11:10, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Rector CVUT
The new rector of CVUT is Prof.Ing. Václav Havlíček, CSc. He became rector on 14.12.2005 Link: http://rektor.cvut.cz/ http://www.student.cvut.cz/

BD2412's RFA
Thanks for supporting my RfA, Pavel - I'll do my best as an admin to help make the dream of Wikipedia into a reality! BD2412 T 22:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for invitation
Thank you for inviting me to join Wikipedia, but I already joined about a week ago and enjoy it. The problem is that sometimes I forget to sign in before editing.

If you are interested in the city of Olomouc, I would like to invite you to read an my article Holy Trinity Column in Olomouc.

User:85.70.255.168 and Jan.Kamenicek 23:29, 25 December 2005 (UTC) in one person

Howcheng's RfA
Thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship. I was successfully promoted with a final tally of 74/0/0. I will endeavour not to let you down. Thanks again.  howch e  ng   {chat} 07:31, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Prostiebor
Dobré utro! Where is Prostiebor? see Isaak Löw Hofmann, Edler von Hofmannsthal. --Sheynhertzגעשׁ״ך 22:14, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the barnstar you have granted me. I shall display it on my User Page with pride. Olessi 21:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Záluží
Hello. You left the note "more villages, about a dozen, will be added later" on this disambiguation page. I don't doubt that other villages by this name exist, but User:Tedernst seems to have disregarded your comment and redirected it to Záluží (Beroun District), so I reverted this action. If you add links to the other villages and create an article for at least one of them, hopefully this won't happen again. &mdash; F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  13:58, Dec. 31, 2005
 * Pavel, thank you for your prompt response. You may wish to read this and comment. &mdash; F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  17:42, Dec. 31, 2005

Sudentenland - Sources
You wrote to me : "Please do not add links to this website into unrelated articles. It is not relevant, at least for Sudetenland. Thanks for understanding. "

Well, you're asking the impossible: I cannot understand what is neither explained, nor defendable. I read on your use page you worry Wikipedia will get a garbage bin reputation - but that is bound to happen in the eyes of everyone who got any decent scientific training, for the first rule is always to mention all sources; unfortunately most contributors are lax (okay, me to on occasion), lazy or worse in that respect, but there are certainly no possible excuses for attacking someone for doing it right! When a source was used (and I did for my minor contribution, so I know absolutely for sure) that alone makes it 'relevant' enough to be mentioned. I have been vandalized and bothered by idiots and sticklers who waste my time on 'criteria' of no relevance to content or worse, but never before in thousands of contributions to some 900 articles did anyone reproach me standard scientific procedure Maybe it's a good thing for both of us that I do not intend to make many contributions on Czech matters Fastifex 21:50, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Ray Kroc
But the list is also a list of ethnic Czechs, and Mr.Kroc had significanat Czech parentage, though he may not have been in tune with Czech culture many of the people on that list aren't. What does Max Wertheimer have to do with Czechs or Czech culture? HotelRoom 23:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * What do you mean the list is unmanageable? Have yous seen List of Slovaks]? Thats an ugly list. This list is fine, it doesnt even have that many articles-less additions. Personally I think the list has too many Austrians on it who were just born in Czech Republic but it's not a big deal. HotelRoom 04:30, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

I honestly don't think the list is in bad shape. I think what it may need are some people working on making articles for the article-less names, but otherwise it's reasonably full. I'm not sure what you have against it, but if you want, I'll research the people and make articles for as many as possible. HotelRoom 23:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Michael Peroutka...
He has a czech name and he says he is originally Czech. However I actually dont have the article which states so you are free to do what is in your best interest.

Regards,

JJ

Asteroids named after Czech towns and villages
Hello Pavel,

You have written to me that you specialize on writing articles about Czech towns and villages. If you look on the page List of asteroids named after places, there are dozens of asteroids named after Czech towns and villages, but their Wiki links go nowhere. Maybe, you could write articles on some of these. Happy New Year

Jan.Kamenicek 18:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I understand. I think you have put a real burden on your back and I did not want to suggest that you should work faster. Jan.Kamenicek 18:54, 1 January 2006 (UTC)