User talk:Pawan-2788

Welcome!
Hi Pawan-2788! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! - Sitush (talk) 21:42, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Ramdasia
Please do not add a massive list of redlinked temples to Ramdasia. Wikipedia is not a directory and it completely smothers the article. Write well-sourced articles for each temple - bearing in mind the information at WP:V, WP:RS and WP:CITE - then consider whether there are sufficient to justify a List of Ramdasia temples article. Note that any redlinked items in the list would be removed. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 21:42, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

You don’t even belong to this caste. Try search in your own task. Either you are Hindu but Sikh at all. Please don’t change anymore fucktard Pawan-2788 (talk) 16:59, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Ramdasia. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 05:49, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Send me your number or full name asssole Pawan-2788 (talk) 17:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Sourcing
Regarding this edit, please note that we actually prefer independent sources and usually deprecate those which might have a conflict of interest. See WP:V and WP:NPOV.Also, we do not put our own commentary into articles. Our role is to reflect neutrally what reliable sources say, not express personal opinions. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 05:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Find which cast you belong to Pawan-2788 (talk) 20:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Sitush (talk) 17:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Your recent editing history at Ramdasia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Also if you continue to insult and threaten people, you will be blocked. Praxidicae (talk) 17:28, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Another Important Note
-- Nick (talk) 17:34, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 17:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:33, 30 July 2020 (UTC)