User talk:PawełMM

--Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 08:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for coming, I am glad you are here, your work with images is great! --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 08:21, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Edward Teller, 1958
Do you care to respond to the comment at Featured picture candidates/Edward Teller, 1958. Also, are you aware you are eligible to state you opinion and its candidacy to be promoted by saying Support or Oppose.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Edward Teller, 1958
You voted at Featured picture candidates/Edward Teller, 1958. I am informing you of Valued picture candidates/Edward Teller, 1958.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Graphic Lab interview at The Signpost
Hello! You seem active at the Graphic Lab, so I wanted to invite you to participate in The Signpost's interview of the project. The report is being written by Rock drum and will be published September 13; this is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Please stop by and answer some interview questions here. Thank you, JovianEye (talk) 13:34, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Edward Albert Prince of Wales Investiture Medallion 1911.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Edward Albert Prince of Wales Investiture Medallion 1911.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Far East Council 1950s.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Far East Council 1950s.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Teresa Cristina
Pawel, I'd like to thank you in private for what you've done with those photos of Empress Teresa Cristina. The final result is flawless. I really appreciate wha you've done. Thank you very much! Regards, --Lecen (talk) 15:08, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Graphic Lab/Photography workshop
Thank you for helping out in the Graphic Lab/Photography workshop, good job keep it up. cheers Gryffindor (talk) 14:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Ponce-Adjuntas road photo
Sorry, PawełMM. I cleaned up the above photo from the Graphics Workshop without "booking it out" first. If you've already completed work on it, please feel free to upload yours over mine. Apologies again, —S MALL  JIM   10:10, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

prośba
Mógłbyś poprawić to zdjęcie, bo miejsce po napisie wygląda obecnie sztucznie. Vearthy (talk) 16:43, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nie chcę narzekać, ale jesteś mało dokładny przy robieniu zleceń z Photography workshop. tutaj miejsce po znaku wodnym wygląda jakby dorobione było automatycznie w jakimś programie do odtwarzania uszkodzonych fotografii. Mógłbyś to poprawić i na przyszłość starać się robić rzeczy bardziej precyzyjnie? Dzięki. Vearthy (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Przepraszam, ale nie chodziło mi o czyszczenie fotografii, a o poprawienie, przepraszam, dość nieudolnego odtwarzania fragmentu zdjęcia spod znaku wodnego. Linie desek były krzywe. To tyle. Vearthy (talk) 14:07, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

thank you
Thank you for the clean-up of the daguerreotype of Jonathan Dwight in the Commons graphics workshop. It looks good. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 08:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
hi Paweł, just to give you a big thank you for all the great work you have done so far. Gryffindor (talk) 23:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Four images
I had just finished editing one of the images [] at about the same time you took the request. Rather than toss out my effort, I posted it. So you only have three to do (or four if you so choose). JBarta (talk) 10:48, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

A request
Hello, PawełMM. You helped many times before and I wonder if you could do it once again. There are three pictures which are being used in Featured Articles I wrote that I believe could be improved:
 * This is a painting of Emperor Pedro II of Brazil. I might be mistaken, but I always had the feeling that there is something wrong about it. I don't know if it's lacking constrast... Since you're an expert, if you believe that there is something that can be done about it, that would be good.
 * This one is a daguerreotype of Pedro II. My only real issue with it is that it looks too bright, don't you think so? Could it be fixed? If yes, could you create a frameless version with translucid background of it and copy to this other file?
 * Now this one is a daguerreotype of Pedro II's wife, Teresa Cristina. My complain about it it's that the picture is clearly a low quality scan. I believe it's called "noise". Take a look carefully and you'll notice that all over it there are noises. Could you do something about it? Is yes, could you also create a frameless version with translucid background and copy to here?

I don't want you to remove scratches or anything that came from the real photos (I want to keep the "old" feeling from them), but only fix any issues that came from poor scan. Also, don't feel obliged to do it, in case you're too busy or you simply don't want to, ok? Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 17:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I liked Pedro II's daguerreotype, but not his wife's photo nor the painting. I'll try to scan an improved version of both. Anyway, thank you very much for your help. You've done a great favor. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 22:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Archibald Cleghorn with family and grandchildren
Can you recreate the chip off the photograph like except with the right coloration similiar to what the previous person did? Thank you.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 10:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi, just wanted to say thank you for doing that image of Danny O'Donoghue, :) Mayhem  Mario  12:13, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

datestamp removal
Hi PawelMM. I noticed that in some watermark removals you did, you changed to. That's good. But to do that for a datestamp essentially places an inaccurate tag on the description page. "Watermark removed" states "Attribution information, such as the author's name, e-mail, website, or signature, that was once visible in the image itself". In this example no such attribution information was removed or moved. Only the date was removed. So, if you remove an attribution watermark, use "watermark removed" (and make sure the attribution info is in the description). If you remove a datestamp, just remove "watermark" (and put the photo date in the description if you think it's pertinent). – JBarta (talk) 18:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Beloxi.jpg
Hi PawełMM, you missed a second watermark in that image... top right. – JBarta (talk) 08:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you very much, PawełMM! You did an excelent job as usual. I'm really grateful! Regards, --Lecen (talk) 17:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for panoramic correction
Thanks a lot for the correction to File:Ambarita2.jpg. Jay (talk) 14:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Signatures
Hey, PawełMM, how are you? I was wondering if you could make new versions with translucid background of the following files; Could you do it, please? --Lecen (talk) 23:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * File:Signature of Pedro I of Brazil.jpg
 * File:Signed initials of Pedro I of Brazil.jpg
 * File:Signed initials of Pedro II of Brazil.jpg
 * File:Signature of Pedro II of Brazil.jpg
 * Thank you very much, PawełMM. I really appreciate your help. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 11:22, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Not trying to annoying, but would you mind doing three of those four signatures again? I didn't like the "blue aura" around Pedro I's two signatures, so I uploaded newer versions with grey background: File:Signed initials of Pedro I of Brazil.jpg and File:Signature of Pedro I of Brazil.jpg. The last one was Pedro II's signed initials, which I considered not dark enough: File:Signed initials of Pedro II of Brazil.jpg. Could you reupload them based on those newer versions? I know, I'm being annoying, sorry. --Lecen (talk) 10:33, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I saw the changes and they look very, very good. Thanks, Paweł, I'm grateful! --Lecen (talk) 10:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Signatures 2
Hey, PawełMM, could you look at some of my signature vectorization requests that were left unanswered here? Thanks in advance.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:50, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Alois Hudal signature.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Alois Hudal signature.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wadah Khanfar.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wadah Khanfar.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice of disputed non-free files
Hello, one (or more) of the images you uploaded that fell into the Non-free Scout logo nocontent category have been re-tagged with Di-fails NFCC. This means that the image may be deleted unless rationale for its inclusion on Wikipedia can be provided. This change was made due to a deletion discussion for the first template. If you have any questions, please reply here (ping me with ) or on my talk page. You can see all of the files at Category:Disputed non-free Wikipedia files as of 21 January 2016. Thank you for your time. Primefac (talk) 03:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Flood images
See. Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Separating Nepali Generals image
Why didn't you help me to separate the images of Nepali Generals as I requested on the photography workshop page?? Please respond to it faster and complete my request. Kind Regards Airkeeper (talk) 07:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Shadow missing
The shadow from the original image is missing from this. Is it possible to upload the image again whiling keeping the shadows? QuackGuru ( talk ) 14:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The original spacing was better. There is not enough space between the. It does not match the spacing with the other images. QuackGuru ( talk ) 16:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The shadow for the handheld stick is missing. QuackGuru ( talk ) 17:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The image is not centered like the original image. I think we need to start over by using the original image and then upload a new image with shadows. QuackGuru ( talk ) 17:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

That image should be deleted. I removed it from the article. Even if it was fixed the image with the grey back is being used for another page. I need to keep the other image using the grey background. I found another image with a white image and shadows. QuackGuru ( talk ) 18:09, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2017 National Jamboree participant patch.png
 Thanks for uploading File:2017 National Jamboree participant patch.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Progressive jpegs
Hello, just an FYI. I notice that some of the jpegs you're uploading for the photo lab page are interlaced/progressive. C:Help:Progressive says not to use this type of jpeg. ( Hohum  @ ) 16:18, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

did you leave?
You are missed!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for getting back with me! Take your time, and take care!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oops, I think I emailed you my notepad by accident, sorry!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
I've commented gratefully on the Photography Workshop page, but I also want to say thank you on your talk page for working your magic on the Elgin Crescent picture just now. We are so lucky to have wizards like you to help us with our Wikipedia articles.  Tim riley  talk    17:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Anna Laetitia Barbauld
Hi. Increasing the saturation and contrast is one thing (I personally think you probably went too far from the original, but that's a matter of taste, and it's fine) - however, the 1px border I left around the image was a deliberate thing which I should explain: Look at the usage in Anna Laetitia Barbauld and see how, without that gap, the jagged edges of the cut-out turn into visually ugly flat, straight sections at the four points where the image touches the border. The 1px gap avoids that happening. Compare and  to see the issue clearly. -- Begoon 07:13, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Mary Meader with tiger.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mary Meader with tiger.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Graphics_Lab/Photography_workshop#Stitch
Hi PawełMM, could you please help with the reflections? Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 21:52, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Erhard Maertens
Thanks for de-contrasting the above. It much better and has some depth to it.scope_creep (talk) 08:35, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Two-step clone painting
The technique I was taught is one I like to call two-step clone painting. Forgive me for assuming you're using GIMP, but GIMP is what I have to reference right now, while I'm at work. I'll swing back tonight at home and add in some references to Photoshop when I can look at the interface.

Basically, what you're doing is creating a palette of textures by using the clone tool with the alignment turned off (because if you can paint with the alignment turned on, you're just clone painting). You make each sample in the palette by finding two or more different shades of a texture and then blending them. Then you just hand paint back in, using those textures. Except for the final trick below, this summary might be enough, so I'll put the rest in a collapse you can read if you like.

You start by finding a region that has the right texture to it. In this case, that's just whatever was to the immediate right or left of the area of the while strip.
 * Grab your clone tool and ensure that the alignment is set to "none" (it's at the bottom of the Tool Options window). Also ensure that you're using a fairly hard-edged brush to start with.
 * Find a reference point free of any details such as corners, then set it as the reference for the tool.
 * Create a new layer to serve as your palette, and begin using single clicks and short strokes to build out an area of that texture. Because your alignment was turned off, your reference point "resets" with every brush stroke.
 * Once you have a decent-sized sample, find another spot with the same texture but a slightly different shade. Look for highlights or shadows or whatever. Then repeat the process, building up a texture sample right next to your original sample.
 * Next, set your opacity way down and switch to a softer-edged brush. Then, using the palette samples, start blending the two different shades. This should be a fairly quick transition, but big enough that you can choose points in the middle or more to one side or another when you're painting back in, later.
 * Repeat this process for all the different shades of that texture. For example, on the carved sides of the table, there were three distinct versions: a very dark one, a lighter yellow one, and a lighter blue-ish one.
 * Once you've done this for at least one texture, adjust your brush and opacity however you think best, and using the clone tool, set a reference point on your palette layer and start painting on a new layer. Use the different shades as needed.
 * The final step is to use the healing brush to "fix" your texture. You'll notice that your texture is just a little bit "off" compared to the existing stuff. This is a result of the pattern that forms when you were making your palette. So using the healing brush, pick a spot with a good texture and start brushing that texture over your painted portion.
 * One last thing: In this case, this work had lines, because it was a drawing that was colored in (likely with a mix of watercolors and colored pencils, given the subject). Since the color scheme was warm, I picked a nice brown color, and on a new layer, drew in those lines with a small, round hard-edged brush. I then set that layer to "multiply" and adjusted the opacity until it looked right.

I hope you find this useful. If you think it is, and you'd like me to go into more detail, I can set up a small tutorial page, similar to my tutorial on colorizing black and white photos. I don't like to just jump ahead with this sort of stuff, because we're all skilled here and it can come across as condescending to write up long-winded "lectures" about the right way to do things. So let me know what you think. Is this an awesome technique that should be shared, or just the same old crap every skilled image editor already knows, or somewhere in between? I'd appreciate any feedback, and for the record, if you ever have any techniques you'd like to share, I'm always 100% open to learning new things. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants  Tell me all about it.  13:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

File:David Kalakaua Kawananakoa.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Trypophobia image
Thanks again for the great work you did, responding to my Graphics lab request about the progressive gif for the Trypophobia discussion. Excellent work. Kudos, Mathglot (talk) 10:40, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Edward Albert Prince of Wales Investiture Medallion 1911.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edward Albert Prince of Wales Investiture Medallion 1911.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Peopleinaline1922 - Cornelia Ramondt-Hirschmann.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peopleinaline1922 - Cornelia Ramondt-Hirschmann.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Palazzo della Rovere
Pawel, thanks a lot for your work! The thread has landed in the archive before I could answer... :-( Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 14:29, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Elisabeth and Erich Wolf
Hallo PawełMMm, I left a further improvement request on the page, thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 18:45, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Heads up
Hey thought it'd be kind for me to let you know I rolled back your edit to ramadan as it broke the infobox. Best, waddie96 ★ (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

File:After Midnight by Eric Clapton UK vinyl single.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:After Midnight by Eric Clapton UK vinyl single.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Files listed for discussion
Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Files for discussion/2021 October 26 if you are interested in preserving their usage. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Charlie Aust on Parade, 1980.jpg
 * File:Charlie Aust on Parade, 1980 (cropped).jpg

Thanks!
Dear PawełMM, You're awesome. Thank you for all your work in the Photography workshop this year. You made loads of images better, and by doing that improved Wikipedia. You even took care of images with only faint watermarks, and I would like to thank you for your work. All the best, Vysotsky (talk) 16:08, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kyushu Institute of Technology.png
Thanks for uploading File:Kyushu Institute of Technology.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you again!
I published Amphitheatrum Johnsonianum live last night with the image you cropped for me and it looks really nice if I do say so myself. Thank you again. jengod (talk) 20:49, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Editor of the Week
User:Aza24 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
 * I nominate PawełMM to be Editor of the Week for their tireless work at Graphics Lab/Photography workshop to create, edit and repair the graphic content of articles by improving photo images. The forum is steadily active, but the participants are almost exclusively those requesting photo edits. He is a graphics design superstar that handles requests by fellow editors to enhance their images all the while improving Wikipedia's finished product. PawełMM has nearly single-handedly curated the requests and delivered excellent results for many months now, possibly years. They are quick with requests and thorough in their work. Instrumental in giving many language versions of Wikipedia a better outlook by improving images. A truly selfless editor and the definition of an unsung hero! His efforts may be behind the scenes, but his work elevates Wikipedia to the highest standards.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

Thanks again for your efforts! &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   12:58, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

File:Haxhi Lleshi 1944.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Haxhi Lleshi 1944.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

File:Omer Nishani 1944.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Omer Nishani 1944.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks
Apologies for having overlooked to mark one of my requests as resolved. I would like to thank you spereately for the thousands of images on which you worked so hard. You have really upgraded the image(s) of Wikipedia. Vysotsky (talk) 07:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)