User talk:Pax:Vobiscum/Archive 5

RE: A friendly reminder
I think it was fair enough. Will Thompson (talk) 06:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks (WGVL)
The people on the so-called Help Desk were arguing over stuff better taken care of on the article's talk page. The thing is no one had questioned the merger until I messed up on my and asked why it wasn't getting a response. Vchimpanzee  ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 14:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Happy to help, it seemed like an uncontroversial move to me. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 18:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Rami Weisfisch
The edit on the Weisfisch page was to remove webside references and the reference to the Punch newspaper in the Bahamas which has a long track record of printing unverified stories alleging scandle. The legal battle in England referred to is sourced to newspaper article 2 years ago. I dont see what is notable about these events which are old stuff Dusk123 (talk) 11:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. In that case we should remove the Punch references only. And just because a story is old doesn't mean that we can delete it, in fact Wikipedia uses sources several 100 years old, the important thing is that they are reliable. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

about BUP
Yes the current edition is about the file format. But the edition dated http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BUP&oldid=244074741 was not about the file format. That is why I tagged for speedy deletion. It is right that I should see the history. Thank a lot. Have a nice day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MahmudAlam (talk • contribs) 18:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

request for third opinion
Hi, I and my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of removing/toning down a section on 'allegation of cruelty' as subsection under 'criticism' section in Operation Blue Star article, concerns include WP:NPOV, the summary of dispute can be found at, please let us know your views/opinion at the talk page of the article so that 'alleged' bias may be looked into and a consensual solution may be found. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 07:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks so much for the new opera singer articles you've created. If you'd like to join the Wikipedia Opera Project, or just find out more about it, see WikiProject Opera. All the best, Voceditenore (talk) 14:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the good reminder. I will be more careful in future.Nrswanson (talk) 23:22, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Paul Althouse
Thanks for starting this article! It's going to be fun to expand it - a very interesting chap. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Audio Machine
You deleted an article about Audio Machine in 2007. I would just like to inform you that Audio Machine is a real company and many people would probably like to use their services. Please don't delete pages just because you do not know their significance. 71.37.21.159 (talk) 20:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your message. I don't doubt that something called Audio Machine exists, but wikipedia has policies regarding verifiability which means we need reliable sources that can verify that something is notable enough for inclusion. If you could point me some newspaper articles about Audio Machine or something like that I'd be happy to help you build an article. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Bhumihar
I've explained my concerns here. Neither does anon give a proper reply in the talkpage nor am I able to contact him because his IP is dynamic. What else can I do other than file for protection? Now, this is a sensitive issue and I do not want this article to drift towards being a piece of propaganda. Thanks- Ravichandar My coffee shop 19:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest making a post at the wikiproject India talk page and getting some input from other people who could help improve the article. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 23:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Category templates
We don't use these templates, this is why they are being deleted. Just check the deletion log. In fact, just last night, around 20 of these pages were deleted:

(Deletion log); 23:07. . Mo0 (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Jesuits" (Speedy deleted per CSD G6, non-controversial maintenance. using TW) Livna-Maor (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) (Deletion log); 06:08 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Roman Catholics" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 2) (Deletion log); 06:07 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Roman Catholic priests" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 3) (Deletion log); 06:06 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Roman Catholic nuns" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 4) (Deletion log); 06:06 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Roman Catholic bishops" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 5) (Deletion log); 06:04 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Roman Catholic archbishops" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 6) (Deletion log); 06:03 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Righteous Among the Nations" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 7) (Deletion log); 06:02 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Protestants" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 8) (Deletion log); 06:02 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Presbyterians" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 9) (Deletion log); 06:01 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Pentecostals" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 10) (Deletion log); 06:01 . . Efe (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Brazilian Nazis" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 1) (Deletion log); 20:54 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Ya̧nomamö mythology" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 2) (Deletion log); 20:53 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Uruguayan expatriates in Brazil" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 3) (Deletion log); 20:53 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Tropicalia singers" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 4) (Deletion log); 20:52 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Tropicalia musicians" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 5) (Deletion log); 20:52 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Tropicalia guitarists" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 6) (Deletion log); 20:52 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Titãs songs" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 7) (Deletion log); 20:52 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Titãs albums" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 8) (Deletion log); 20:51 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Titãs" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 9) (Deletion log); 20:51 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Tennis tournaments in Brazil" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 10) (Deletion log); 20:51 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Yanomaman languages" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 11) (Deletion log); 20:50 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Vice-Presidents of Brazil" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * 12) (Deletion log); 20:50 . . Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Category talk:Ya̧nomamö" (G6: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup)
 * Hi, could you show me where this decision was made? I can't find anything on the Brazil project talk-page or the Biography project talk-page... Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)