User talk:Payansarun

Welcome!
Hello, Payansarun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AutomaticStrikeout 18:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Rev Sr Rani Maria


A tag has been placed on Rev Sr Rani Maria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AutomaticStrikeout 18:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rev Sr Rani Maria


A tag has been placed on Rev Sr Rani Maria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AutomaticStrikeout 18:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Regarding your edits
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Your article
I did not delete your article, I only tagged it for deletion. It was deleted by an administrator (twice) because of copyright issues, among other things. I would suggest that if you think your article is really notable, you should submit it to Articles for Creation. AutomaticStrikeout 20:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It was not deleted before it was created. When you clicked "Save page" you created the article. Furthermore, I did not delete your article, only an administrator has that capability. If you would like to talk to the administrators about it, you can contact them here and here. AutomaticStrikeout 21:05, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * In case you didn't realize this, I am not an administrator. Yes, I believe Articles for Creation is the answer for you. There, you can submit your article and somebody else, not me, will review it and determine if it should be an article on Wikipedia. If they decide it shouldn't be one, they will explain why. AutomaticStrikeout 21:10, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You received the message from me because I tagged the article for deletion. However, it was the administrators who came through after me and deleted the article because they determined it should be deleted. AutomaticStrikeout 21:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I am not sure what you mean. If you have questions about the deletion, maybe you should ask the administrators, as they did the actual deletion, not me. AutomaticStrikeout 21:35, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * When an article is tagged for speedy deletion, it is brought to the attention of the administrators, who might not otherwise see it. If I hadn't tagged it, there is a good chance someone else would have. I tagged it because I don't believe that the subject of the article is notable enough to have an article about them. You obviously disagree, so I would suggest that you submit the article at Articles for Creation if you want to get another opinion. That is all I have to say about it. There is nothing more for me to do. AutomaticStrikeout 21:49, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I suggest you not accuse me of harassment. You seem to be harassing me actually. I am not sure how the deletion log works, but I will point out that your article was again tagged, not by me. Your page is being deleted because it violates copyright and because the subject is not notable. AutomaticStrikeout 22:18, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Servant of God Rev.Sr.Rani Maria
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Servant of God Rev.Sr.Rani Maria, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.srranimaria.com/lifehistory.html. As a copyright violation, Servant of God Rev.Sr.Rani Maria appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Servant of God Rev.Sr.Rani Maria has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Servant of God Rev.Sr.Rani Maria and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Servant of God Rev.Sr.Rani Maria with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Servant of God Rev.Sr.Rani Maria.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 22:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

With regards to tagging
I didn't tag your article this last time, a different user did. I will not tag the article anymore, however someone else almost certainly will. The problem is that the subject of the article is not notable and you appear to be violating copyright. As best I can tell, this article has been deleted four times. I don't think that's going to change, even if I don't tag it. Also, I don't appreciate being accused of harassment or your statement implying that I might not be a genuine editor. I thought you said you believed in discussing things peacefully. AutomaticStrikeout 22:50, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I understand that it is frustrating to spend a lot of time on an article and then have it deleted. I've had it happen to me, though maybe not to the same extent. However, you made numerous false accusations against me on the talk page of the head of the website, even though I haven't done anything wrong. Your article is being rejected because the person is not considered notable enough to have her own article and because of the copyright concerns (which I did not bring up). Now, before you accuse me of harassing you, please consider that you have posted multiple all-caps messages on my talk page (as well as others) and then you have reported me with false claims mixed in. AutomaticStrikeout 23:46, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Some friendly notes
Hi, it looks like you're having some issues. Hopefully you'll take a few friendly, peaceful words of advice.

First, don't ever type an entire message in capital letters LIKE THIS - it's considered to be shouting, and is terribly impolite - it's usually the best way to have your message ignored.

Second, don't leave the same message multiple times (or in multiple locations). For example, I see you left an essentially identical message on User talk:Jimbo Wales three times!

Third, it might be a good idea for you to read two key policies: the General Notability Guidelines for Articles, and The Deletion Process.

Finally (for now) hopefully you'll use the articles for creation process. This will help you to draft an article and get proper help from experienced encyclopedia editors. dangerous panda  23:41, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 00:24, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Rev.Sr.Rani Maria
Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. All sorts of issues. Just some minor thing, titles like Rev Sr should not be in article titles, and talk page messages should not be in full capitals. It would also have been better to have waited for a reply to your comments on my talk page before rushing to Jimbo  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * An article on sister Rani Maria says as following your text is copied from a source you do not identify. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 * Even if the text was not copyright, you did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Even if she is notable, you need to provide independent neutral sources.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. A few examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: always help the poorest of the poor... Her example of life and death are a stimulus for... we have a powerful intercessor before the Lord... she sacrificed her life... she was faithfully and selflessly... life and her death has become an inspiration and hope for us... serve the people even at the cost of ones life... to be another Christ and this has brought graces for us &mdash; much, much more in the same vein, it's literally a hagiography, not an encyclopaedia article.

Editor Review
I am currently cleaning up the backlog over at Editor Review and I found this in the backlog. As it is no longer posted on the main page at Editor Review, I was wondering if I should remove it from the backlogs and put it to rest or if I should repost it for community review. I will remove it from the backlogs three days from now if I am not given a response.— cyberpower Offline Happy 2013 22:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You can probably remove it since they have been blocked for the last 146 days. GB fan 23:43, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks.— cyberpower Offline Happy 2013 00:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)