User talk:Payswan73

Welcome!
Hello, Payswan73, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Lead[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * I don't think so
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * It is concise, but could benefit from more information that better outlines the article.

Content[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * No added content
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * No added content
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * I don't think there is anything missing, but the article cover sooooo much information that it seems likely some of it doesn't belong and is unnecessary. As a reader, the article is so overwhelming that the information almost becomes meaningless.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No

Tone and Balance[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Content in the article as a whole seems to be neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No

Organization[edit]
Guiding questions:


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * No.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Not that I noticed
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic
 * Absolutely not. The article is basically a list of different topics that fall under UX design, but the list is not sorted logically, and things are not connected together at all, so it is almost impossible to digest the information. All sections of the article are approximately the same length, though some topics (like usability and accessibility) should be more important than the others. Also, the subsections are not clearly marked and hard to differentiate.

SydneyL23 (talk) 18:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)