User talk:Paytdaddy/Processing fluency/KatiePetti Peer Review

I’m impressed with this groups designated article because it’s content is engaging and relevant to the field of cognitive psychology. Although brief, I find the section on Applications to be most notable because it presents information regarding why processing fluency is important in business and marketing and how using it’s components can enhance these fields. This made me aware of why research in the area of fluency affecting judgement is important and how beneficial it is to our economy. Overall I felt the article is well-written and did not require much revision, but did need a well developed Lead (introduction) section, a few in-text citations and adding to the Additions sections. Concerning the Lead, Wikipedia recommends the lead to be about 1-4 paragraphs and should answer who, what, when, where and why. I think writing the Lead will be a challenge for this group for this reason: there is not enough sections contained within the article to develop a Lead under these guidelines, therefore my recommendations would depend on how the group plans to proceed in the articles development. If the group is planning to develop additional sections for this article then the Lead will be easy to develop because Wikipedia states that a good Lead does not summarize the topic, but summarizes the article itself. If the group does not to add sections to the article the Lead could still benefit from a more thorough summary of the Research and Application sections. Concerning the single most important thing the group could do to improve their article I think they could choose from two things, 1-Adding to the Applications section which would make the article more engaging by showing how research in the field is important to real-life, or 2- developing a good Lead by summarizing the information contained within the two sections, or possible more sections if they plan to add additional sections to the article. The article I’ve chosen to review “The effects of Stress on Memory”, suffers some of the same developmental errors that this groups article suffers from. Both articles need a well developed Lead, both articles are missing in-text citations in places that should contain sources and both are in need of additional sections. Furthermore, both articles contain information that is important in the field of cognitive psychology research--one article's information is important in business and marketing and the other is important in mental health.