User talk:Pbender3469

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
 * Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
 * We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
 * We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:33, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Vitreous humour
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Vitreous humour without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!  D b f i r s   20:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your reply on my talk page. The above was a standard comment from the anti-vandal software I was using.  Don't worry about accidental removal of content.  This happens quite a lot and it gets flagged up as possible vandalism, which it obviously wasn't in this case.  I find it useful to click on "preview" to check the changes in case I've accidentally made a mistake in my edit.  Best wishes, and happy editing.    D b f i r s   10:14, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Videos
If the videos were under an open license we could add them right to Wikipedia. Otherwise we do not typically link to videos on youtube. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 13:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)