User talk:Pbrks/Archives/2007

Image tagging for Image:Thrice.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Thrice.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 14:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Dear Pbroks13,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. --⁪froth T 18:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair Use
Please do not add album images to stand-alone galleries with little information. Wikipedia does not allow users to add such images without getting proper consent from the album's copyright holder. See WP:FUC and WP:FU for further information. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  04:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Pbroks13. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that: you have little experience vandal fighting. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego talk  20:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)


 * It is no trouble at all, thanks for bringing your concerns forward. The reason that we like applicants to have some experience in anti-vandal patrol is twofold. Firstly, it is inevitable that new vandal patrollers will make some mistakes as they learn, and while someone eventually points any mistakes out to them, with VP it is possible to affect a large number of users before this is noticed. Secondly, VP is geared to people who understand the terminology used in vandal patrol; it often abbreviates terms and such. Some manual RC patrol, or patrol with less intensive tools is enough to familiarize users with these things. You certainly meet any other requirements, I don't see any disruptive history, or anything like that, so if you just try out vandal patrolling with a 'starter' tool (I strongly recommend Lupin's tool, it's 'bad words' list and regexes are quite superior to any tool out there, including VP. However, it has some disadvantages, it is slow, and a bit harder to easily revert and warn with it. If you try it out, and I see you reverting only vandalism and warning the vandals with the appropriate warnings, I will be happy to approve you. Again, thanks for contacting me, Prodego  talk  00:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Certainly, it was no trouble at all. Remember to warn vandals when you revert them. Happy editing! Prodego  talk  21:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not revert citated sources as you did on the Anberlin page
Kapish? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hoponpop69 (talk • contribs) 02:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC).

Personal attack removed Hoponpop69 06:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I regret to inform you that you are wrong
It doesn't matter if the band don't want to be considered a christian rock band, it is based on what reliable sources say. The reliable sources which YOU deleted. If you do it again you will violate the Three-revert rule and be blocked. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Hoponpop69 (talk • contribs) 04:21, 7 May 2007 (UTC).

Please adhere to sources and user consensus
You refuse to let us list Christian rock on the Anberlin page, despite users agreeing upon it, and having 3 sources for it. Your only argument against it is that the band does not call themselves that, which is not a valid point since wikipedia does not use first party information.Hoponpop69 01:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Check the talk page and you'll see I'm not the sole person who came to this conclusion. Furthermore for the milionth time what the band says they are does not hold any weight in this discussion. They could claim to be a Norwegian Death Metal band, but that wouldn't make it true. You need a third party source. This is your last warning.Hoponpop69 17:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Request for Mediation
This message delivered: 08:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC).

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Pbroks13. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that a check of your last 5k contributions has shown that you often not warn users when reverting. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. « Snowolf How can I help?»  10:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

AIV
Thanks for the report at WP:AIV...keep up the great anti-vandal work! Jmlk 1  7  06:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) Looks like we both got targeted by the same rather persistent vandal. Oh, joy... =\ -- Gogo Dodo 06:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

CSD on Nepean High School (Emu Plains)
There appears to be an ok stub in the edit history, if we can get the vandalism to stop. I've already listed the page at RFPP, but nobody's responded yet. Speedy may not be necessary. -wizzard2k ( C • T •  D ) 07:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Maxgeist
Why was he given an "only warning" after a "final warning" was already posted? As the "mental retardation" edit came after my "final warning", I've posted it to AIV. Andy Saunders 18:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

June 2007
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made, you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Lwa r f  Talk! 01:57, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for rving the vandalism to my userpage. Cat-five - talk 09:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent report to WP:AIV
Thank you for making a report at Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Khu kri 15:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Macs
mac are very bad they will come to you hosue and kill you i am warnig you now help yourself —Preceding unsigned comment added by Killthemac (talk • contribs)


 * I wouldn't worry about this, I'm blocking this user on username grounds and obvious vandal role. Nihiltres(t.c.s) 16:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Use of minor edits check box
Please remember to mark your edits as minor when (and only when) they genuinely are minor edits (see Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one (and vice versa) is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  / edgarde 21:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Pbroks13! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.  Daniel  07:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Liar (It Takes One to Know One) EP.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Liar (It Takes One to Know One) EP.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Xdoanex_-_The_Shape_of_Videos_to_Come.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Xdoanex_-_The_Shape_of_Videos_to_Come.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 20:30, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Dude you are lieing about Anberlin
Alright Dude face it you know Anberlin is not christian rock!!! They even say there not iam sick of you say "oh iam maditiing on it" or so crap like that. Dude most people say there not christian rock on the disscution thing So put what they are and what they would say they are. Alt rock/Pop punk/Emo/Indie rock. Thank youskateremorocker you can delete after read. Also i would like to add you have been meditating on this for like two months now that bull crap dude. your just saying that to have an exuces to have no one CHANG IT and me and so other random people have been brave souls to change it now stop lieing about Anberlin dude. Skateremorocker 14:38, June 25, 2007 (UTC) Signed by Pbroks13

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Xdoanex - The Shape of Videos to Come.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Xdoanex - The Shape of Videos to Come.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Guys Like You Video.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Guys Like You Video.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 21:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anberlin
The article Anberlin you nominated as a good article has failed, see Talk:Anberlin for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a review. T Rex  | <font face="Tahoma">talk  15:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Wikimania in Atlanta!
Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 09:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Guys Like You Video.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Guys Like You Video.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Higina Video.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Higina Video.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kenotia Promo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kenotia Promo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Family Style DVD.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Family Style DVD.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:54, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Image-Cities-Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Cities-Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Fuel EP.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fuel EP.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kkmurray 03:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Image-Cities-Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Cities-Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Shine On EP.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Shine On EP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thriller 25
I'm not really sure you should promote the 25ths anniversary edition of Thriller to GA, since it really ought to be merged back into Thriller, as it's simply an appendage to that article and should probably not be encouraged. -- linca linca  11:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Thats for that comment linca but it does need its own article, if you knew anything about special editions etc you would realise that Thriller 25 will be counted as a new album in the eyes of RIAA and the like. It will have its own individual sales figures that will NOT be added on to the 104 million counter of thriller. It contains more than 3 new songs so is a new album.

Also Pbroks13 I have made most of the changes you suggested. Would you have a look and give feed back. Yours Realist2 (talk) 22:51, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

math template
I noticed you added maths rating to an article talk page. When you do that, please fill in the quality, importance, and field parameters. It is not necessary to tag an article just to indicate it is math; the list of mathematics articles is maintained automatically without any need for talk page tags. The only purpose of the maths rating template is to assign quality ratings to articles. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 16:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Thrice
I've reviewed the article at PR. Hope you find it useful. --Dweller (talk) 10:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Image-Cities-Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Image-Cities-Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:31, 23 December 2007 (UTC)