User talk:Pc home

Welcome
Hello, Pc home, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 06:35, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Number of the Beast. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:33, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Number of the Beast
This article doesn't need every idea that anyone has ever had about this concept- that would make the article very long and very silly. Instead, the purpose of the article is to explain what the term means, and what the most significant schools of thought have had to say about it. It isn't helpful of you to add the ideas of an individual pastor, unless those ideas have been extensively written about in theology or history journals. Thanks for not restoring this information. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:38, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Number of the Beast. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''I see you have now added this six times. Please read the links you've been given. Continuing to add material that has been removed by a number of other editors is considered edit warring and usually leads to the editor being blocked for at least 24 hours. Use the talk page to convince other editors your material should be included, but please read WP:OR and WP:VERIFY first. Thank you.'' Dougweller (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)