User talk:Pc kirby/Swiftlight (software)

To do:
 * Add sources, to establish the notability of the software
 * Remove promotional tone, by attributing opinions to the sources that gave them
 * Fix reference formatting
 * Add wikilinks, to other articles

Relevant policies:


 * WP:NPOV - neutrality at all times
 * WP:CORPORATE - notability guidelines for companies
 * WP:COI - conflicts of interest
 * WP:PEACOCK - avoiding promotional language


 * Software_notability failed policy on notability, still instructive
 * Software_notability essay on notability, just suggestions

Useful pages:
 * WP:CITE - how to format references
 * WP:LINK - linking to other articles

Discussion
''to leave a message, click edit, type your message, and sign it with ~


 * What changes / sources et do I need to make to complete this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pc kirby (talk • contribs)
 * A few things. 1, to respond to a comment, start a new line and add 1 more colon  than the comment above.  This indents the comment for easy reading.  2, This software's notability is still in question.  A single review from PC World is a good start, but a few more sources would be much better, especially coverage in non-technical places like a newspaper.  Are there other articles, like you mentioned?  Oh, and when you sign your name, just use four ~, not the 'nowiki' that's just to keep it from signing my name when I show you. Ocaasi c 13:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)


 * i'll look for and add more sources .... Will these be better as external links or references? Thanks for all the additions. I note you've added quite a bit (pros / cons) from the review - which is more than i've seen on other pages. does this make the entry look more of a "long entry" rather than an encyclopedic reference? Pc kirby (talk) 13:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)pc_pc_kirby