User talk:Pcalert

August 2021
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Hindutva, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alerts
Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, I believe this is a mistake and the sanction can be reverted.
 * My edit on the page was only for the removal of an opinion coming from a voluntary organization - it (quackery) is more of slander against a competitive (alternative) field of medicine.
 * While there is regulated acceptance by global institutions and governments, I did not go into the merits of Ayurveda, it's (in)efficacy or whether it is considered scientific or not - I did not touch the pseudoscience-related content or anything that might harm the referenced information on the page.
 * Nevertheless, I realized afterwards that I could have used the talk-page to discuss beforehand. I shall keep a check on that going forward.
 * I am here to contribute and would be glad to keep doing so. Pcalert (talk) 05:20, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Pcalert, the notifications above are not a sanction against you in any way. They are a notice that some of the areas you're editing in have more strictly applied rules than other, less controversial areas of Wikipedia. Glad to hear you're here to contribute. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 05:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)