User talk:Pcg111/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linguistic monogenesis and polygenesis (May 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linguistic monogenesis and polygenesis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Linguistic_monogenesis_and_polygenesis Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Linguistic_monogenesis_and_polygenesis reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Edits at Allan R. Bomhard
Hello, I'm Warrenmck. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Allan R. Bomhard in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit summary was that you “removed libellous material” and that the underlying author was not a nostraticist, but the source explicitly made the exact claim that you removed. The removed text was not libellous. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 16:43, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * See also WP:LEGAL. It is forbidden to make legal threats and continue to edit Wikipedia; your edit summary came close to that. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry a lot. It was a misunderstanding of mine, I speak Spanish natively and I didn't know that libelous was a so strong word. Thanks a lot for your revert. Excuse me for my enormous misunderstanding. Pcg111  𒂊  16:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Warrenmck I was referring that in the quoted there isn't any reference to nostraticists referring to Bomhard as a maximalist who casts his nets as widely as possible (Philologos isn't a nostraticist, see his Wikipedia article). Again, thank you for your clarification. Pcg111  𒂊  16:54, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'll stop editing on Allan Bomhard's article. Pcg111  𒂊  17:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I think that is a misinterpretation of the statement in the article. "Among nostratists" means "in comparison to other nostraticismizators" or whatever you think the correct suffix combination should be. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @David Eppstein Ok, thanks. I'm sorry Pcg111  𒂊  18:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Your AfC draft Draft:Linguistic monogenesis and polygenesis has been accepted
I have merged Draft:Linguistic monogenesis and polygenesis with Polygenesis (linguistics). It is now titled Linguistic monogenesis and polygenesis. Thank you for your contributions. — Sago tree spirit  (talk) 23:52, 27 May 2024 (UTC)