User talk:Pchpfilm

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to California Coastal Commission, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: California Coastal Commission was changed by Pchpfilm (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-05-01T08:00:14+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Dear TW,

My update is vitally important information, not opinion, based on a US Supreme Court decision. To not include this information in the article by Wikipedia defeats the "neutrality" perspective of Wikipedia by only allowing one point of view to be expressed. e.g no wiki article on Bill Clinton would be complete without mention of impeachment, no article on Richard Nixon complete with mention of Watergate. To prohibit my salient points on the California Coastal Commission is censorship of the worst kind - betrayal under the guise of fairness. Like taking people's land lives under the guise of environmental protection.

To allow the CCC to present it's public relations rhetoric unchallenged is, I think, not in best interest of the people of California and in violation of my 1st amendment rights - which I believe is a doctrine you subscribe to.

I would be happy to work with you to create language that expresses these well-known, documented facts, but to allow a false image of the California Coastal Commissions creation to be presented to the people of California and the world should not stand.