User talk:Pcirrus2

We recommend that you use one account only (see WP:SOCK). Is there any particular reason you abandoned account? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 19:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fred J. Hart
A tag has been placed on Fred J. Hart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Yousou (talk) 20:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Tango
The article on the Spanish wiki refers to 'tango' generally, in Argentina, in Uruguay and wherever. It shouldn't be linked with the English article 'Argentine tango' because the topic in here is as wide as in 'tango (dance)' and you know it. Qoan (tell me!) 19:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * In the way the article is written right now in here it makes all sense to keep the interwikis as they are. If the contents on tango (dance) actually change to refer just the dance, may the situation also change, but untill then you will agree with me that there is no need to modify iw's before modifying the articles. And anyway, es:Tango doesn't refer just to Argentina, but to Uruguay and all the variations that evolved from it untill modern tango. Qoan (tell me!) 20:58, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Geraldin Rojas


The article Geraldin Rojas has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Andrew Kurish (talk) 22:33, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Piotr Skrzynecki
Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:14, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Argentine tango appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. ''Please do not write prescriptive text into the article. Instead, the article is to be written with descriptive text, discussing the current state of Argentine tango. We are not trying to roll back the clock to restore an ideal form.'' Binksternet (talk) 18:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

'commercialization of tango' section cleanup
The 'commercialization of tango' section contains mostly references to people's personal opinions. Making a reference to someone's personal opinion in a book or online article of what they think of other people and how they dance is gossip, not an encyclopedic, verifiable source of factual information. And using a fictional movie (The Tango Lesson) as a reference for factual information? Come on! This is a very low quality section. It needs to be cleaned up or deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.189.187 (talk) 05:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Argentine tango. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your recent actions on the Argentine tango article appear to be bordering on an edit war. Please discuss the edits on the editors talk page. All involved users have received the same warning/notice.'' AndrewN  talk 00:55, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Proposed deletion of List of property management software


The article List of property management software has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This list doesn't include a single notable entry. There is one independent source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ronz (talk) 21:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of property management software for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of property management software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of property management software until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Ronz (talk) 17:52, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)