User talk:Pclemo

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Protonk (talk) 07:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Philip clemo
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Philip clemo, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.divine-art.com/AS/philipclemo.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Philip clemo has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Say Headcheese!-- hexa Chord 2  18:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 04:21, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Philip Clemo
I have nominated Philip Clemo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Philip Clemo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Protonk (talk) 07:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Hello and welcome
Hey Philip, I figured I'd drop by and give a human welcome to you rather than these templated and automated messages you have received. I declined the speedy deletion request of your article and nominated it for "articles for deletion". That may seem odd, but there are more than a few deletion processes at wikipedia. You are invited to comment on that AfD but I should let you know that the simplest way to convince people to keep the article is to show that you have been covered in reliable, independent sources in some detail. This means that a newspaper, magazine or television (or radio, etc.) item must have covered you in some fashion. All you need to do is point us to that coverage and the article will probably be kept. The deletion discussion regarding your article will run 5 days, so there is not a lot of rush.

Apart from that, please remember that nominating your articles for deletion doesn't mean that you or your contributions are not valued. Wikipedia is host to many different people seeking to create articles about themselves and in 99% of the cases, those articles are not what gets included in the encyclopedia. I would suggest that you take a look at Your first article to get a sense of what you should think about when creating a new article. Otherwise, there are plenty of existing articles for you to cut your teeth on. I hope that your experience with wikipedia hasn't been soured by this. If you have any questions you may ask me on my talk page or place the text Help me on your talk page and someone will be along to answer your question. Protonk (talk) 07:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Pclemo! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Philip Clemo -

File permission problem with File:Philip Clemo pic.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Philip Clemo pic.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:00, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Philip Clemo Wikipedia image.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Philip Clemo Wikipedia image.jpg, which you've sourced to Colin Gray. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)