User talk:Pcllin/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Following is the link of the article I evaluated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayerUnknown%27s_Battlegrounds

Here is my evaluations:

'''Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?''' Almost all information is recent since PUBG released in 2017 and the oldest references are from 2017. Well, there should be something to be added because PUBG has some modifications and updates that Wikipedia did not include since the game updates once several months.

'''Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?'''

Everything in the article is relevant to the topic about the PUBG. In fact, for this Wikipedia, there is nothing distracted me because everything is talking about the game itself.

'''Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?''' The article is neutral and the claims do not toward some particular positions since almost everything introduced in the article are the facts about the releasing of the game, awards of the game and the sales of the game.

What else could be improved? The article could be improved by updating more frequently since the game has frequent updates through the season. Also, it could add the champions of each tournaments not only the awards that the game received.

'''Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?''' The links do work and the sources are definitely supporting the article, but some of the sources are from blogs which might not be a reliable sources as indicated in Training. For example, RPS is a UK-based blog.Pcllin (talk) 22:33, 8 June 2019 (UTC)