User talk:PdDemeter

Proposed deletion of WS-Topics


The article WS-Topics has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The following collection of pages on components of the Web Services Resource Framework do not (in my opinion) independently pass the test for notability: WS-Topics, WS-Addressing, WS-Transfer, WS-Eventing, WS-Notification, WS-Notification, WS-Resource, WS-BaseNotification.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 16:02, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WS-Addressing


The article WS-Addressing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The following collection of pages on components of the Web Services Resource Framework do not (in my opinion) independently pass the test for notability: WS-Topics, WS-Addressing, WS-Transfer, WS-Eventing, WS-Notification, WS-Notification, WS-Resource, WS-BaseNotification.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 16:03, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WS-BaseNotification


The article WS-BaseNotification has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The following collection of pages on components of the Web Services Resource Framework do not (in my opinion) independently pass the test for notability: WS-Topics, WS-Addressing, WS-Transfer, WS-Eventing, WS-Notification, WS-Notification, WS-Resource, WS-BaseNotification.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 16:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WS-Resource


The article WS-Resource has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The following collection of pages on components of the Web Services Resource Framework do not (in my opinion) independently pass the test for notability: WS-Topics, WS-Addressing, WS-Transfer, WS-Eventing, WS-Notification, WS-Notification, WS-Resource, WS-BaseNotification.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 16:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WS-Notification


The article WS-Notification has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The following collection of pages on components of the Web Services Resource Framework do not (in my opinion) independently pass the test for notability: WS-Topics, WS-Addressing, WS-Transfer, WS-Eventing, WS-Notification, WS-Notification, WS-Resource, WS-BaseNotification.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 16:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SoldierSonTrilogyBooks
Template:SoldierSonTrilogyBooks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jenks24 (talk) 10:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:FarseerTrilogyBooks


A tag has been placed on Template:FarseerTrilogyBooks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Liveship Traders Trilogy


A tag has been placed on Template:Liveship Traders Trilogy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:TawnyManTrilogyBooks


A tag has been placed on Template:TawnyManTrilogyBooks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes ( ).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rob Sinden (talk) 14:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Places in the Realm of the Elderlings


The article Places in the Realm of the Elderlings has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 21:43, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Characters in the Realm of the Elderlings for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Characters in the Realm of the Elderlings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Characters in the Realm of the Elderlings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:26, 18 August 2022 (UTC)