User talk:PeaceNT/Archive 5

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back
Welcome back my lazy friend. I've wating for your return for long and finally you've come back. You must have been very busy with your work, right?  A  W  15:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Nomen Nescio Gnothi seauton 16:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Dorus Rijkers
The article above has sources\references on its' page. Watch 'em at the article itself. Or did you mean something else? Let me now,

-)-(-Haggawaga (&#124;-&#124;) Oegawagga-)-(- 19:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Talk:Dorus Rijkers
Thanks, Peacy. I can't help myself from telling off all my thoughts though I could make the user feel dissatisfied. I have seen you huge contributions yesterday. I have to learn a lot from you, horrible editor.  A  W  04:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm sorry, Peacy Peacent. But don't you think that "Peacy" pronounces tinklingly. Very funny sound. :)  A  W  04:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Re:RfA
Thank you for saying you would support me if I re-ran. However I feel I should point to you that I had a second RfA which ended just over a month or so ago in which I withdrew at (17/16/1), I didnt think it was going to succeed. Ryan has offered to nominate me and I kindly asked him if he would not mind nominating me in about June/July and he said he would, however the fact you are willing to support me means a lot. Thanks and respectfully. Tellyaddict Talk 09:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Again thank you, I'll consider that, hope you're enoying being back! Tellyaddict Talk  09:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Editor Review
Hi, thanks for reviewing me! I responded to your questions on my Editor review page. I hope they clear up the queries you had. Thanks again,  Asics   talk  Editor review! 12:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Trivium project
I thought I better contact you here regarding this matter.

Is there anything I can do now to make it official?  Asics   talk  Editor review! 17:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That's cool then! Got me worried for a second!  I'll remember to go through the official places next time.   Asics   talk  Editor review! 17:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Happy editing! :-D  Asics   talk  Editor review! 17:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Pop by
Thanks for the pop by and for your comment above the pop by!  &gt; K a mo p e &lt;  18:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

see my comments...
... at Talk:Phil Mitchell. --Ling.Nut 18:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: template
Uhm, in fact I know that but, you know, like your kind of ''in.. e..''. :)  A  W  14:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Forget about it. I'm not in a good mood today. Now move to other issue. I see you are a great editor. Do you think we should collaborate to improve some articles to GA class first and then FA? If you agree, suggest some potential ones. Regards.  A  W  14:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's a good idea. I've looked through the article. Very promising.  A  W  15:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * BTW, I suggest you remove the old signpost. They're very annoying as I upload your talk page.  A  W  15:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Phil Mitchell
Hi PeaceNT,

Does PeaceNT mean "Peacin' it" or "Peace New Testament" or "Peace No Trouble" or...? :-)

Don't apologize. In fact, I have a confession to make. About ten minutes or so after I posted those comments on Talk:Phil Mitchell & amp; on your talk, I started regretting how I had handled the situation. I tried to think of ways of undoing what I had done (the way I had done, more accurately), but couldn't think of any..

I'm not saying I'm backtracking on my opinion about the article. I would have quick-failed it. [In fact, I intended to, but got busy.] What I am saying is that I shouldn't have put you in a corner like that... I was just surprised, I guess.

Moreover, I think it's fine that you are trying to encourage the editors rather than quick-failing it. That's a difference in style. The only prob is, that particular article needs huge amounts of trimming (in my opinion) and huge amounts of re-writing to make its tone more encyclopedic. It would take a big effort by more than one editor to make it GA in a week. Therefore, if you drag it out by putting it on hold, it might be like building them up just to let them down.. that's my opinion; I could be wrong. Different people have different styles, and no style is superior.

I'll just step aside and let you handle it. I appreciate your helping out at GA!! I'm really too busy with school to contribute much more; my recent contribs were just a sporadic burst. [I used to be more involved.] Like any other task, after you do it a couple times and get feedback from "old hands" (like Homestarmy) it will become a familiar task.

Later! --Ling.Nut 16:00, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


 * PS: I was just gonna walk away from the article, but then I saw they were arguing with you because of comments that I had made. So of course I need to take the heat for arguments that started with me. :-) Later! -- Ling.Nut 21:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

(undent). Once again, you've caused me no stress, and there is no need to apologize. :-) You were unfortunate to run into immature, truculent editors. Immature editors are shocked and offended when they hit up against the hard reality that their first draft is not as Pulitzer prize-worthy as they have imagined it is... and indeed, that no one's first drafts are so wonderful. Seasoned editors quietly get to work improving things. Immature editors cry "Foul!". Keep up the good work, -- Ling.Nut 10:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Lavin Kumar
Why are you Deleting this page? I worked really, really hard on it and if you delete it I'll cry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedgxke (talk • contribs)

Thanks!
Thanks for the pizza, and for reverting that vandal!  &gt; K a mo p e &lt;  12:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Monobook
No problem. You're right to choose TW. It's a great tool.  A  W  13:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * hey, have you seen the Today Feature Article? It's surprisingly short.  A  W  13:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by your "skin"? You mean interface, or sth?  A  W  13:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

My RfA


Hello, thank you for supporting my RfA! I was promoted with a final tally of 68/12/0. Also, please wish a Happy Birthday to Her Majesty the Queen. Vivat Regina!

Bloody Mary (urban legend)
You changed the page into a redirect stating that it is only a fork file of Bloody Mary (person). While this is true, I believe the topic is still notable enough to deserve its own page. Could you please explain yourself further? Your response would be much appreciated. Thank you. PeaceNT 16:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * It might deserve it's own page at some point, but you can't just have two articles on the same topic going at once with different information and different sources. Go to the main page and argue there to split it off if you want. DreamGuy 19:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * And, for the record, I do support he idea of it being its own page. Certainly it's more than a footnote, and the (person) page is all cluttered. But the article does appear to have been written an its own without looking at the main article and some standard sources on the topic. Considering the number of movies and books both released and planned on the topic it can eventually be a separate article, but that'll be done by moving info over from what's already there and not just writing a new one (they should ideally be merged, with only the most encyclopedic material staying). DreamGuy 22:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

TeckWiz's RFA
Hey PeaceNT. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week under my old name, TeckWiz. I'm now known simply as User:R. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. -- TeckWiz is now R Parlate Contribs@(Let's go Yankees!) 23:31, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Renomination
For some reason I couldn't find a hard limit (some very old discussion when it was still VFD suggests a month). The best I could find in recent documentation was Deletion_policy which states that repeatedly nominating an article in the hopes of getting a different outcome is disruptive. When renominating you should carefully consider your reasoning (Guide to deletion) and provide new information that wasn't used in the earlier discussion, or point out a basic flaw in that original discussion. Generally speaking, the more recent it was, the better an idea it is to NOT renominate. Your comment was right on the nose. - Mgm|(talk) 18:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Userpage
Thanks for nice request but I don't feel like having a userpage now. (I'm tired of vandalism)  A  W  16:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Haha, see this funny vandalism.  A  W  09:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you for the autograph from The New  Mikemoral.

LGBT WikiProject newsletter
This month's project newsletter (hand delivered as SatyrTN and Dev920 are away). Best wishes, WjBscribe 03:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)