User talk:Peacemaker67/Archive 19

Recommending new editors to your WP Military history
Hi Peacemaker67,

Our system generated a list of potential new editors for your project. They may be interested in collaborating with your project members on your project's articles. As you will notice, the list contains both experienced editors and newcomers. Both are valuable for Wikipedia and your project. Please go ahead and introduce your project to them, and point them to some project tasks to start with. We also provide a template invitation message to make it easier to contact the potential new editors. Just click the invite link to write the invitation message.

We'd appreciate it if you could fill the survey to let us know what you think about our recommendations so we can improve our system. Please let me know below if you have any general feedback about our recommendations. Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 05:28, 11 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Peacemaker, Just wonder if you had a chance to look at the recommendations I sent to you? Thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 22:35, 12 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Peacemaker, I update the recommendation list sent to you earlier. I fixed some bugs in the previous version (as you might have seen that some editors on the previous list were not quite active). Very sorry about it, but now, everything should be good! Please take a look, thank you! Bobo.03 (talk) 16:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi sorry I haven't had a chance to look at these, RW very busy at present. Will try to look this week. Cheers, Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 09:10, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Thank you! Hope you are doing well! Bobo.03 (talk) 16:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Precious five years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gerda! I have no idea how you keep track... Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:43, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

50th Battalion (Australia)
G'day, PM, do you have a copy of Freeman's book (Hurcombe's Hungry Half Hundred) to hand? If so, I wonder if you might be keen to expand the 50th Battalion (Australia) article a little? Unfortunately I don't have access to the source, but feel that there is an opportunity to expand the article a bit. Anyway, thanks for your efforts with Jensen's article. Nice work, by the way. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I do have a copy of Freeman. I'll take a look when I get a chance, bit snowed under in RW at present. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:13, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Cheers, PM. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:44, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Yugoslav destroyer Dubrovnik
Hi, I'm scheduling WP:TFA for April. I noticed that you have listed the destroyer at WP:TFARP for 24 April, but I have another article that I'm going to run in that slot. I see that the date refers to the scuttling of the ship, but I notice that there are two other articles from this topic listed at WP:FANDC that are not date-linked, so I could run the article on 26 (or 27 or 29) if you don't mind losing the date link for the destroyer too. Alternatively I could run one of the other Yugoslavian boats.

Let me know what you think as soon as possible. Incidentally, there are three coordinators rotating months, so I can't guarantee anything for month I'm not responsible for Jimfbleak - talk to me?  11:42, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day I'm pretty relaxed about the date. Cheers, Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 05:40, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Yugoslav destroyer Dubrovnik scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Yugoslav destroyer Dubrovnik article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 26, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/April 26, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:39, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive
G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:


 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
 * updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg 331dot • Cordless Larry • ClueBot NG
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Gogo Dodo • Pb30 • Sebastiankessel • Seicer • SoLando

Guideline and policy news
 * Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
 * Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
 * The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
 * The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

Technical news
 * There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.

Miscellaneous
 * A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
 * The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Yugoslavia WW2
Good day

I stumbled across your edits for the '1st Cossack Cavalry Division' page, and saw that you also show a great interest in the Balkans and the happenings there during WW2. I am busy doing research on the 1st Cossack Division for reenactment purposes, specifically for their deployment to Yugoslavia - are there any books or reading material that you could recommend on the topic?

Thanks in advance,

Ctenizidae (talk) 10:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC) Cteniz

PS: first time using one of these pages to communicate with another wiki editor, please forgive me my ignorance!
 * G'day Ctenizidae. Reliable detailed sources on the Cossacks are hard to find, as most are written by sympathetic emigres or former Partisans, and are likely to be biased one way or another. Newland is probably one of the better ones if you can locate a copy. Tomasevich only mentions them in passing a few times, other sources include the Osprey series. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:38, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

For your work on the Commissioner Government

 * Thanks for your excellent review. Prusin improved it a lot! Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you for another one, Yugoslav destroyer Dubrovnik, " the flotilla leader (large destroyer) Dubrovnik, a British-designed ship that was the de facto flagship of the Royal Yugoslav Navy during the late interwar period, and saw service under three flags during World War II. She conveyed King Alexander home after he was assassinated at Marseilles in 1934, and was captured by the Italians at the Bay of Kotor during the April 1941 Axis invasion of Yugoslavia. As Premuda she was the most important and effective Italian war prize ship of World War II, doing duty on as an escort on over 100 North Africa supply runs. After the Italian surrender, she saw service with the German Navy as TA 32, during which she notably clashed with Royal Navy ships in the Battle of the Ligurian Sea. She was scuttled by the Germans at Genoa in April 1945."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:29, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gerda! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg None
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Chochopk • Coffee • Gryffindor • Jimp • Knowledge Seeker • Lankiveil • Peridon • Rjd0060

Guideline and policy news
 * The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
 * A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news
 * AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new  function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
 * When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
 * The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
 * There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee is seeking additional clerks to help with the arbitration process.

Obituaries
 * (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Duke/duke of Antioch
Hi Peacemaker. Thanks for checking over Constantine Dalassenos (duke of Antioch). Yes, it should be Duke, but changing it is pushing my Wiki-skill set. I have had a go, but would be grateful if you could look it over.

I am also considering putting this in for GA, after a good copy edit. Any thoughts? Just anything which jumped out at you as borderline for B but which mat be an issue at GA.

Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:09, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Fixed. In this case, you need to be able to delete the other page in order to make the move, which I've now done. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:44, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

German war effort arbitration case opened
You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 30, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Serbian Nationalists
For the past year, there has been an anonymous parasite jumping from IP adress to IP adress as "a mobile user" manipulating Balkan related articles. Is there something that can be done about these chavs? Look at yhe Chetnik and WWII in Yugoslavia pages for example. Never seen such a dedicated revisionist before. Impressive even for a Southern Slav. 96.246.85.228 (talk) 00:21, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * A perennial problem, but not even close to being the worst though. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Muslims in NDH
You let stand an uncited claim that there were ‘no prominent Muslims’ in the NDH, and then remove reference to Džafer Kulenović, who served as Vice Governor? This is ridiculously biased.
 * I've clarified, and it was cited, to Lepre pp 14-15. And learn to sign your posts please. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Greetings, or rather..... gday! Sir Mr51and 02:53, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Please be aware.

I have little experience with codeing.

Thank you for welcoming me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Anderson51 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg None
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Al Ameer son • AliveFreeHappy • Cenarium • Lupo • MichaelBillington

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a successful request for comment, administrators are now able to add and remove editors to the "event coordinator" group. Users in the event coordinator group have the ability to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit. Users will no longer need to be in the "account creator" group if they are in the event coordinator group.
 * Following an AN discussion, all pages with content related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies, broadly construed, are now under indefinite general sanctions.

Technical news
 * IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
 * There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
 * It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

Arbitration
 * A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

Miscellaneous
 * In early May, an unusually high level of failed login attempts was observed. The WMF has stated that this was an "external effort to gain unauthorized access to random accounts". Under Wikipedia policy, administrators are required to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Geman war effort case
Dear Peacemaker67, On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, I would like to inform you that you have been added as involved party in German war effort  case. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions or require assistance. Sincerely, Kostas20142 (talk) 17:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, not unexpected. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Maurice Wilder-Neligan scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Maurice Wilder-Neligan article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 29, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/July 29, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  09:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

July Military history backlog drive: Russian translation project?
Hi! You probably don't know me, but I've written over 80 World War II related articles and have noticed a serious backlog and lack of coverage of topics mostly covered in Russian. (Soviet censorship certainly didn't help with this issue). For next month's missing article drive, could it be dedicated to translation from Russian Wikipedia? Some pretty major and/or interesting things like ru:Новороссийско-Таманская операция, ru:Воздушные сражения на Кубани (1943), ru:Новороссийская операция (1943), ru:Темрюкский десант, ru:Десант на мыс Тархан, ru:4-я стрелковая дивизия внутренних войск НКВД (one of the most atrocious divisions of the NKVD), ru:Гиль, Владимир Владимирович, ru:Клочков, Иван Фролович, ru:Черных, Сергей Александрович, ru:Антилевский, Бронислав Романович, ru:Лунин, Борис Николаевич, ru:Грабский, Михаил Исаакович, ru:Косса, Михаил Ильич don't have English articles, but I couldn't find a page for listing missing articles and their Wikidata items. (I would like to create one, should it be something like "WikiProject Military history/missing articles" or "WikiProject Military history/articles missing in English"?) All the to-do lists are respective to task forces, and despite the Wikiproject having a lot of members it seems like there is very little encouragement of the development of topics under-represented in English. I hope we dedicate July or August to Russian-language topics. English Wiki really needs to increase coverage of the USSR in WWII, from purges of the Air Force to military campaigns.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 20:01, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day, thanks for getting in touch. I agree that Russian topics are unrepresented on en WP, as are Yugoslav ones (which I work on). In my view this is a result of the language obstacles when most editors don't understand languages other than English, and most of the sources are in such a language. We do have a few who work on Russian topics though, for example, , who maintains a list of missing topics here. You might like to get in touch and collaborate on some articles? There is also the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force which lists others who are interested in the area. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Peacemaker, Planespotter has already gotten in touch with me. The missing articles list that in my userspace could definitely be expanded and moved to make it broader. Kges1901 (talk) 23:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That's good to hear. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

FA for Fawad Khan
Hi, I've recently listed Fawad Khan in FA candidates. I'll an honor for me if you consider reviewing it.Amirk94391 (talk) 04:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day. Thanks for the heads up, but it really isn't my area. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Tried Twinkle?
wp:Twinkle Easier EW postings. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Jim. I probably should, but things have settled down in the Yugoslavia area over the last few years, and it has been rare that I've had to report someone. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:47, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Sock
Hi Peacemaker67. A CheckUser concluded that Adoniosis belonged to who has a long history of socking and vandalizing Yugoslavia articles. Since you patrol many articles of wars in Bosnia, Croatia, Serbia, and Kosovo, whenever you see new accounts warring, accusing other editors for being anti-Serb, and deleting warnings from their talk page, compare them with the evidence present here. VJ-Yugo has been the most disruptive vandal on Yugoslavia articles lately and all his socks need to be stopped. Cheers, Ktrimi991 (talk) 00:30, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day, I hadn't come across VJ-Yugo, but saw the sock investigation after the edit-warring block. I had suspected Adoniosis was a POV warrior of some sort. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I should have added that I couldn't take admin action regarding Adoniosis because I largely wrote the article they were edit-warring on (so I was therefore "involved"), but I don't watchlist a lot of more recent Yugo-related articles (being personally familiar with the Bosnian War in particular, I try to keep it at arm's length), so if you see anything similar that looks like it needs admin attention, feel free to ping me. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Yugoslavia articles are continuosly under attack by vandals and socks, and admin help is always needed. I added myself to this list, did I do it correctly? Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:25, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Pbsouthwood • TheSandDoctor
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Gogo Dodo
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Andrevan • Doug • EVula • KaisaL • Tony Fox • WilyD

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Andrevan • EVula

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
 * A request for comment closed with a consensus that the promising draft template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

Technical news
 * Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
 * Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon (Codemirror-icon.png) in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
 * IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous
 * Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Nationalistic IP editing on topics related to Serbia
Hello Peacemaker67. This IP editor might be getting close to a block, I particularly noticed this removal from the Protectorate article, with the edit summary 'Got rid of Propaganda'. They did this twice:



I am unsure if it is worth the paperwork to take an IP through the full rigmarole of ARBMAC warnings. If they won't communicate, a block might be simpler. EdJohnston (talk) 18:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * POV warrior by the look of it. I'll keep an eye on them. Thanks Ed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Albanian Kingdom 1939-1943
Hi Peacemaker67, your proposal for a move of this article is very reasonable. Should we make a move request to avoid any confusion of some editors? Ktrimi991 (talk) 00:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Not on proposed title change to
I note you proposed another alternative to my proposed title, "Nazi genocide against the Polish people." Well-founded though your version is, I think any verison that includes the term genocide is likely to fail, even though it shouldn't.

My question: even though you prefer your version, do you favor my proposed version ("Nazi Plan to Eliminate the Polish People") over the current one? Steeletrap (talk) 20:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Operation Retribution (1941)
(Crickey, they let the lad loose with an SLR! And a fellow "crow-eater".)

I was just wandering aimlessly among the FAC nominations when this one caught my eye. In the info box, you might consider changing Germany to Nazi Germany, else Angela Merkel might cut off the wheat imports! Cheers, William Harris •   (talk) •  12:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:10, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks
For blocking that IP. I was just about to report them, but was in the middle of something. Thanks again!  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 07:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * They're back, now using . 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:20C1:6EB2:A1AC:D1DF (talk) 07:14, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * And now . 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:20C1:6EB2:A1AC:D1DF (talk) 07:16, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Next in line, . 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:20C1:6EB2:A1AC:D1DF (talk) 07:19, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Interesting articles
Hope you do not mind, but after seeing you over at John B. Magruder tidying up some references (thanks by the way) I “stalked” you a little and read some of your FAs and GAs. Interesting content on Yugoslavia during World War II; a book I am reading—Death of the Wehrmacht—touched on Operation 25 to explain Kesselschlacht. Are there any books you recommend on Yugoslavia in WWII, particularly during the occupation?TheGracefulSlick (talk) 05:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem and thanks. Kesselschlacht was definitely a major factor in Operation 25. As you can probably tell, Yugoslavia in WWII is my main area of editing interest. In English, it is hard to go past Tomasevich's 2001 book, which examines the various bits Yugoslavia was chopped up into, particularly the Axis puppet Independent State of Croatia and the genocidal campaign it ran against Serbs, Jews and Roma. Pavlowitch's Hitler's New Disorder and Hoare's Genocide and Resistance in Hitler's Bosnia are also quality sources on this period (and not as hefty as Tomasevich). Tomasevich's 1975 work on the Chetniks is also worth a read. It is a great shame he died before completing his planned book on the Partisans. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:34, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Bill McCann
Ealdgyth wants to run this one on the 10th ... are you interested in doing a blurb for it? - Dank (push to talk) 21:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC) G'day. I'll knock something together. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Bill McCann scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that I've scheduled Bill McCann to appear on the main page as today's featured article on 10 August 2018. If you need to make tweaks to the blurb, it is at Today's featured article/August 10, 2018. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've trimmed it down to the character limit now. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Today, thank you for Maurice Wilder-Neligan, "an English-born Australian Army soldier of WWI who rose from the rank of private to command a battalion during the latter stages of the war. A superior tactician, one of his attacks was described as "the best show ever done by a battalion in France". He was also an eccentric character, once chasing his officers off a parade ground on horseback to show his displeasure with their efforts at drill. An administrator in New Guinea after the war, he died there, probably caused by wounds he received during the war."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:32, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gerda! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Milhist Contest for August 2018
Hi. Just a clarification re: the August 2018 Milhist contest list and your edit summary earlier today ("For the scoring period ending 31 August 2018: trimmed, we don't advertise nominations here, confirmed score"), that was an incorrect assumption on your part. I honestly wasn't trying to advertise the GANs for two of my articles. I had posted the descriptions there to help me keep track of what I still need to work on vs. what I've completed uring the August 2018 article drive (because I'm also working on a different article drive for Women in Red). My apologies if this wasn't the correct procedure, but there was no "ulterior motive" there on my part. Kind Regards. 47thPennVols (talk) 16:16, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day, sorry about making that assumption, I was at the wrong end of a long process of checking, scoring and tallying, if that's any excuse... I just don't think we want to encourage those entering to include such information. These things are probably best tracked on user pages. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries, but thank you for the explanation. And an even bigger thank you for all of the work you do for Milhist. It does not go unnoticed (although I'm sure it may feel that way since most of us are probably really bad at expressing our appreciation). For all of the times you've done the math for us, tweaked content, and urged us to do better, many thanks. Have a great remainder of the week! 47thPennVols (talk) 03:24, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Sro23
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg KaisaL • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news
 * After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
 * Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

Technical news
 * The WMF Anti-Harassment Tools team is seeking input on the second set of wireframes for the Special:Block redesign that will introduce partial blocks. The new functionality will allow you to block a user from editing a specific set of pages, pages in a category, a namespace, and for specific actions such as moving pages and uploading files.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, you are very kind. Thanks for your input to the case as well. We may not have seen eye-to-eye on a number of aspects of what has been going on, but a diversity of opinions is what makes WP strong. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:58, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 42nd Infantry Division Murska
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 42nd Infantry Division Murska you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Merge
Hi, Peacemaker! I saw your suggestion to merge the article World War II in Yugoslav Macedonia to its parent subject (I know, right? How prompt) and I agree that a merge is necessary and overdue. I originally created the article and it quickly became -- as they invariably do -- a cesspit of nationalist propaganda, so I avoided it like the plague (and subsequently Wikipedia, for that matter). It still remains an eye sore so I would like to know where you presently stand on this matter? And whether we can work towards finally actualising what has been a priority for some years? Regards. ['kɔbɹa] ☠ 18:59, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, everybody. If I see the article was created by User:Frightner who was blocked on 9 October 2007 by User:Fish and karate with an expiration time of indefinite, because attempting to harass other users. It was an attemted the article to be based exclusivelly on Yugoslav Communist propaganda sources. However this issue was changed to relative NPOV. Jingiby (talk) 19:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * What's your deal, man? You were blocked indefinitely too at one point so no need for your unconstructive opinions here. ['kɔbɹa] ☠ 03:48, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room! My view is that all these articles using geographical boundaries of post-war subdivisions of Yugoslavia are ahistorical, and should be covered under the various annexed and occupied territories, but I am not focussed on that now, and in the interim, the existing article is as good a place as any to collect the information about the area of Yugoslavia that was annexed by Albania and Bulgaria. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * My apologies, sir. I didn't realise this guy is watching my every move. My focus was getting the article up to an encyclopaedic standard and merging it seems to be the best way to achieve that as it currently has multiple issues (least of all being redundancy) yet I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. ['kɔbɹa] ☠ 04:29, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you for Bill McCann, "a decorated soldier of World War I, a barrister, and a prominent figure in the military and ex-service community of South Australia during the interwar period"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gerda! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:57, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 42nd Infantry Division Murska
The article 42nd Infantry Division Murska you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:42nd Infantry Division Murska for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gog the Mild -- Gog the Mild (talk) 08:42, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort closed
An arbitration case regarding German war effort articles has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

For the Arbitration Committee,
 * 1) For engaging in harassment of other users, is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia under any account.
 * 2) is topic banned from the history of Germany from 1932 to 1945, broadly construed. This topic ban may be appealed after six months have elapsed and every six months thereafter.
 * 3) is reminded that project coordinators have no special roles in a content dispute, and that featured articles are not immune to sourcing problems.
 * 4) Editors are reminded that consensus-building is key to the purpose and development of Wikipedia. The most reliable sources should be used instead of questionable sourcing whenever possible, especially when dealing with sensitive topics. Long-term disagreement over local consensus in a topic area should be resolved through soliciting comments from the wider community, instead of being re-litigated persistently at the local level.
 * 5) While certain specific user-conduct issues have been identified in this decision, for the most part the underlying issue is a content dispute as to how, for example, the military records of World War II-era German military officers can be presented to the same extent as military records of officers from other periods, while placing their records and actions in the appropriate overall historical context. For better or worse, the Arbitration Committee is neither authorized nor qualified to resolve this content dispute, beyond enforcing general precepts such as those requiring reliable sourcing, due weighting, and avoidance of personal attacks. Nor does Wikipedia have any other editorial body authorized to dictate precisely how the articles should read outside the ordinary editing process. Knowledgeable editors who have not previously been involved in these disputes are urged to participate in helping to resolve them. Further instances of uncollegial behavior in this topic-area will not be tolerated and, if this occurs, may result in this Committee's accepting a request for clarification and amendment to consider imposition of further remedies, including topic-bans or discretionary sanctions.
 * -Cameron11598(Talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 38th Infantry Division Dravska
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 38th Infantry Division Dravska you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Image of Gravesite for Bill McCann
Hi Peacemaker67: Congratulations on your FA status for Bill_McCann! In reviewing this image of his gravesite used in the article, I am wondering if it is not actually the gravesite of his widow Mildred McCann? Cheers! Bob Cummings (talk) 13:54, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day . They are both buried there, it's just Mildred died before Bill so she's first. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:41, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Les bon assessors

 * Thanks Gog! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:08, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Alabama Civil War Regiments (Union)
Category:Alabama Union Civil War Regiments – The following redirects need to be deleted within the following Category 1st Alabama Infantry Regiment (Colored) – This needs to be deleted since we have two of the same name = 55th Regiment United States Colored Infantry.

55th Regiment United States Colored Infantry – This needs to be without the Italics but to be same as followings: 55th Regiment United States Colored Infantry ... without italics.

11th Regiment United States Colored Infantry is under "S" and is not numerical under the Category:Alabama Union Civil War Regiments.

Adamdaley (talk) 05:40, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Adam, as I said, I'm happy to help if you go through the process of determining what the common names are for these regiments. I think that perhaps you should use the usual Requested Moves process, as I am concerned that you are just wanting to move them to whatever the NPS says, and I don't think that is the right way to approach it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll leave the American Civil War like it is. Someone else can do it. I've tried to do it and talk about it now, it's obvious, that nobody wants this sorted. Adamdaley (talk) 06:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Whatever works for you. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:59, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't want to be the way like last night. I asked for proof of Unit naming. Wouldn't that be a fair statement? Adamdaley (talk) 07:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Adam, we need to do a survey of what these units are called in reliable sources. There isn't going to be a "proof", they will be called different names in different sources. Once we have that for each regiment, we'll be in a position to determine the common name and can decide article titles. Until then, not so much. The complaining about other editors not getting on board with what you want to do isn't helping. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:09, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I know. My mistake. Sometimes I get "hot headed" is when I'm frustrated and I couldn't do much. As I said above, the only sources I have is the National Park Service and Dyer Compendiums. I think has the Compendiums and of course he's not interested in doing them. So there are two people who have access to the Compendiums. Adamdaley (talk) 08:18, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Adam, pinging people and having a go at them for not engaging with what you want to do isn't going to encourage them to join in. This looks to me (as an Aussie with no idea about the ACW) to be a highly complex area, with many regiments having multiple names in their short histories. Perhaps you are biting off more than you can chew, and should focus on a less fraught area. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:34, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You own the Compendiums. I remember you chasing down a copy at the same time I got mine. In fact, here's your confirmation of getting them delivered first: User talk:MarcusBritish/Archive 6. So why don't you stop being a big girl's blouse worrying about what other people are doing, buckle down and use them yourself to get the job done! And instead of complaining about what "different sources" say, use that most notable one that literally compiles official war records into one comprehensive accurate source. As Peacemaker67 said: pinging people just so they can be aware that you're making off-hand remarks about them, rather than inviting them to a civil discussion, literally amounts to WP:HARASSMENT. Personally, I couldn't give a toss what you think about me, but I suggest you stop before you bother someone who does. Such behaviour is beneath you. As for having OCD, maybe you should learn to control it better, instead of letting it influence your ability to apply some common sense to these situations. This charade only proves that you don't work well when you get yourself all worked up. You keep asking for people to prove their advice by helping you. Load of nonsense! Advice is something you either take or leave because you asked for it. Expecting others to act on their own advice in order to give you a leg-up is unreasonable. — Marcus (talk) 09:36, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Dyer's Compendium is available online now at the Internet Archive, so everyone can have a copy now. . Honestly the issue here is that Dyer used a naming system that was used by some state Adjutant General reports such as 81st Regiment Infantry instead of 81st Illinois Infantry. However, the original Dyer naming system is not what is used in the secondary sources; most secondary sources use 81st Illinois Infantry rather than 81st Regiment Illinois Infantry. (comparing google books searches and )Kges1901 (talk) 09:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't have a problem with you . I stated that you had a copy and had done a table of them where I had updated some of them on their new assessment you had them with their rating. Which of course you'll see in the history. I possibly even stated that you were not interested in doing the ACW Regiments and I understand. That's fine with me. As I also stated I found the U.S. Archives confusing and was hoping someone would do a search on my behalf to show me there were other options to explore. Unfortunately, KGES1901 was moving some Regiments and I was unable to do a full move and wanted some admin help. Adamdaley (talk) 09:59, 17 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I could be wrong but it sounds to me like it depends on your location how you refer to a unit. By which I mean: in-state or out-of-state. If you live in Illinois you might well just refer to a local regiment as the 81st Regiment Infantry, but if you're in another state then you'd need to say 81st Illinois Infantry to disambiguate it from the other states in the U.S. any of which might also have an 81st regiment. Or it could simply be that Dyer organised regiments by listing them under state headings, and so removed the state name for ease of reading and to save space. Especially when you consider that he manually typed the entire Compendium himself. Just a thought. Same with secondary sources: historians need to include the state as an identifier. Which makes me wonder if there is a two-fold naming convention, that in-state officials and federal officials use for unit identification. — Marcus (talk) 10:32, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You are correct about Dyer. I have noticed that sources published during the Civil War in state sometimes omit the state name, but postwar even in state sources use the state name. So it can be said that there was a two-fold naming convention in same ways during the war itself, but postwar there is only one naming convention. Kges1901 (talk) 10:35, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Then I would suggest those of you working on the ACW regiments determine a suitable naming convention and use MILHIST to create a consensus for any proposed formats in order to identify which one would work best for Wikipedia and aid editors/readers in identifying units. That might lead to a more productive discussion or debate than those to date, which could attract "silent" editors and help identify ACW-related article editors, since anyone who might support/oppose proposed formats might be willing to help him organise the articles better than sit quietly on the side-lines then whinge whenever he tries to do anything. Just because we have a couple of policies and MOS formats in place doesn't mean you can't propose another specifically for ACW units. Afterall, we're not talking just a handful of articles here, but literally hundreds. I mean, why do units from a 19th century war have to be named in accordance with the way units are named in the 21st century? Seems more like modernism than a practical solution to a larger issue. — Marcus (talk) 15:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I've never had a problem of discussing the Unit names. That's why I started "Part 2". I simply wanted to know what other options were other than the sources I had, unfortunately, no one came up with anything. Adamdaley (talk) 01:31, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 38th Infantry Division Dravska
The article 38th Infantry Division Dravska you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:38th Infantry Division Dravska for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg None
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Asterion • Crisco 1492 • KF • Kudpung • Liz • Randykitty • Spartaz
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Amorymeltzer • Mr. Stradivarius • MusikAnimal • MSGJ • TheDJ • Xaosflux

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

Technical news
 * Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
 * Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says . An example is   which is now.
 * Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you for Avenue Range Station massacre, not forgetting that "in 1848, two white settlers massacred at least nine Aboriginal people, mainly women and children, including a baby. The main perpetrator, James Brown, was charged with the murders, but it didn't go to trial due to settler solidarity and legal restrictions on evidence being given by Aboriginal people. Years later, a "pioneer legend" arose about Brown which downplayed the murders."! - Cruel, even more with my morning song of praise on the same page. - Would you cast an eye someone's first FAC, Biblical criticism? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:43, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks as always Gerda! I tend to avoid religious subjects, I have enough drama with Yugoslav topics... :) Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Understand all too well ;) - I thought the "criticism" part might appeal to you, though. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:45, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Werner Mölders
I started looking into Schmider and expanded the article. My read, Schmider indicates that Mölders had substantial influence in the pardoning of Caron. Let me know if this meets your expectations. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:43, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day, yes that is what I understood with my terrible German. The article needs to reflect that, but also needs to focus on what is in Braatz and Schmider regarding the whole shooting down incident, rather than the older source. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Yugoslav torpedo boat T5 scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the Yugoslav torpedo boat T5 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 25, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/October 25, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:05, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.

Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

RfA !vote
Hello Peacemaker67. I am not in the habit of asking respondents at RfA to substantiate their !vote and I am only messaging you because I am wondering if you have made a mistake that you'd rather self correct before the badgering ensues that I suspect you will encounter otherwise. It seems that saying JLAN lacks substantive content creation is inconsistent with their record. Thank you for considering my comment, it is given with esteem.--John Cline (talk) 10:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day, thanks for your note. It was not a mistake. I am pretty clearly talking about guiding an article through GAN (and FAC for that matter). I see no evidence of that in their record you have linked (and which I looked at before !voting). The FA and two GAs were nominated and squired through the process by other editors without any involvement by JLAN, and there are only two B-Class articles listed, and only 11 C-Class articles. Anyone can create dozens of Stubs and Start-Class articles, but to really understand content creation you need to put your work through the GAN and FAC processes. I entirely stand by my neutral vote and my statement. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Thanks Ian! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:12, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Congratulations also from me. Your election as lead coordinator is very well deserved. Nick-D (talk) 07:37, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Nick. Greatly appreciated. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:40, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Coordinate 2018–2019
– I thought I put my name down for this years' Coordinator but it's not in the actual list of Coordinators for the next year. Adamdaley (talk) 23:34, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Adam. You did, but there were only ten coord positions, and you and Cinderella157 were the 11th and 12th on the tally, so you weren’t elected. Thanks for putting your name forward. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:35, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Alright. Thanks. Adamdaley (talk) 01:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

comment
Would you mind commenting on the peer review of Ira T. Wyche? Eddie891 Talk Work 22:31, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure. Done! Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:40, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Conflict with Eastfarthingan
Hello

I must inform you that the editor Eastfarthingan is making changes in several articles about the war of emancipation in a controversial point.

The articles are the following:

Bolívar's campaign to liberate New Granada

Battle of Carabobo

Battle of Pichincha

Vargas Swamp Battle

Battle of Boyacá

Eastfarthingan knows that there is controversy about it and still insists on its changes without reaching a consensus, clearly seeking to impose his vision by force to the point of wanting to reach a war of editions.

I ask that the articles return to the status prior to the Eastfarthingan editions as a status quo, since the articles were in that form for a good time before the conflict began. If the user wants to make changes in a controversial point that seeks consensus first.

Thank you. --Muwatallis II (talk) 22:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note. I have posted on one of the talk pages warning about edit-warring and suggesting you and the other editor use dispute resolution like a RfC to resolve your impasse. Continued edit-warring will likely result in a block (for both of you). Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Competition query
Hi Peacemaker67 and good day. I have come across a series of relatively new articles on operations during the Vietnam War, such as Operation Scotland II, which AustralianRupert assessed as C class with the comment "C-class as the lead, Background and Aftermath would need expansion for B class, but otherwise seems quite a tidy, well referenced article." I am inclined to expand the lead, background and aftermath sections of several of these to get them up to B class.

By the letter of the competition rules my reading is that this would most likely make them eligible for entry. However, having worked on a number of entries to the competition, it seems to me that the amount of work involved would be relatively slight. In which case I would be open to an entirely reasonable charge of gaming the system for "cheap points". Having been there before I am wary.

I would appreciate your advice on this. (I am not looking to use a lot of your time nor for a reasoned explanation. A "Forget it." or "Probably ok, if you seem to be pushing it I'll let you know so you can withdraw the article(s)." would be appreciated.) Thanks Gog the Mild (talk) 15:46, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day . If you've done enough to get the class lifted from C to B, particularly when an independent assessor has rated it as C and highlighted the improvements necessary for B, then that is enough to score it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

GAN Review of Oswald Boelcke.
G'day mate (says he in a suspiciously American accent),

I have reached a stopping point in the requested revisions. I invite your further review.Georgejdorner (talk) 20:16, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I've passed it, George. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I must say, you are one of the few "editors" in here that can actually edit--even you are heavy handed in insisting on script. I am going to submit this to DYK with you listed as a co-editor or co-nom if you do not object.
 * Pardon the curiosity provoked by your informal portrait, but did you work covert operations when you were in service? I was with the Raven Forward Air Controllers.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:15, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . That would have been interesting work. I'm fine with the DYK nom if that's what you'd like to do. And regards my service, nothing covert. That is a pic from the mid-80s, in an ancient Iroquois on an exercise somewhere in northern Australia. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Interesting work? Do you Aussies understudy the Brits for understatement? And I do wish to show my appreciation of an extraordinary editing job.Georgejdorner (talk) 18:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

late contest update
HI PM, Rhine_Campaign_of_1795 passed GA in September so I added it late...I don't usually log in over the weekend. I've put it in September, but I can move it to october if you'd prefer....auntieruth (talk) 14:52, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I've fixed it. Thanks for the heads-up, Ruth. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Another query
Hi Peacemaker. I hope that you don't mind me pestering you with queries. If you do, please say. I do some work for GOCE, occasionally copy editing MilHist articles listed on their Requests page. I would like to check that: I would welcome a reality check that both of these "rules" are appropriate. A brief and to the point response is fine; I don't want to use more of your time than I have to. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:14, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) It is OK to contribute to the ACRs and FACs of articles which I have copy edited, so long as I declare this.
 * 2) It is not OK to assess GANs which I have copy edited.
 * G'day . Always happy to answer queries. I often do a light c/e on articles I assess, at any level, mainly to save the time of explaining what it is I think needs tweaking. I then prompt the nom to revert if I've mucked anything up factually. If all you have done with a GOCE c/e is adjust prose, I don't see why you couldn't also do the GAN, and I doubt anyone would object. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Yep, GOCE work is essentially prose. OK, I shall feel freer re GANs but apply some common sense; eg, copy editing machine translations involves quite a bit more input to an article that giving one a light prose dusting. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:30, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I would just note in the GAN that you have done a c/e. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:32, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Will do. (Obviously the nominator will be well aware that I C/Eed. I think that I will ask GAN nominators in advance if they are happy with me assessing. Just thinking aloud. No need to respond. Thanks again.) Gog the Mild (talk) 12:05, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Justlettersandnumbers • L235
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bgwhite • HorsePunchKid • J Greb • KillerChihuahua • Rami R • Winhunter

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Cyberpower678 • Deryck Chan • Oshwah • Pharos • Ragesoss • Ritchie333

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Guerillero • NativeForeigner •  Snowolf • Xeno

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, the process for appointing interface administrators has been established. Currently only existing admins can request these rights, while a new RfC has begun on whether it should be available to non-admins.
 * There is an open request for comment on Meta regarding the creation a new user group for global edit filter management.

Technical news
 * Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
 * The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
 * Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
 * The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
 * Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
 * Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Interview request
Hi, To mark the 150th anniversary of The Bugle, Ian and I are running an interview with some of the editors who've been involved in it for a lengthy period. If you have time, we'd appreciate it if you could join in at WikiProject Military history/News/October 2018/Interview. We're planning on sending the next issue out in about 24 hours (Sunday night, Australian time), so I'd be grateful if you could post any responses within that time - sorry for not inviting you earlier. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 05:16, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day . Done, although I must say my involvement was very minor. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot Nick-D (talk) 05:54, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

1st West Virginia Cavalry
Thanks for the advice. I will wait a little longer, and if I get no interest I will shorten it. The 1st West Virginia Cavalry is probably the state's most popular Civil War regiment. The state of West Virginia has suffered in recent years because of the decline of the coal mining industry, and has never been a state with lots of prosperity. Crossing the border from Maryland to West Virginia, one can quickly notice the difference. I have always felt that anything I can do that is positive for West Virginia is a good thing, and I wanted to make sure that the regiment that did so much was not shortchanged. That being said, the Early Action, Colonel Richmond, and Gettysburg Campaign sections would be easy to make much shorter. Thanks TwoScars (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure, I sometimes struggle with summary style, as I want to include all the info that is available on a given subject. In this case though, I feel that it is too long for our readers. Good luck with it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Military fiat
The quote "a decision is made and enforced by military means" could be anything done by the administration or bureaucracy as a normal part of its foreign policy. Popped up on the Citation Hunt page for a citation needed. It seems this quote comes from a piece of fiction, Farewell to Follies By Xingu Fawcett I hope I'm reporting this to the right person I'm not on the WikiProject Military History Ronald Sexton (talk) 04:17, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Wehrmachtbericht
Hi, Thanks a lot for starting the RfC on the Wehrmachtbericht - it's a good way to consider and settle this long running issue. I've somewhat WP:BOLDly just added a new option 2, with what I think is a half-way point which reflects some of the issues raised in the discussion as well as previous discussions. I hope that this is OK. Please feel free to amend it, including by moving it to option 3 if I've messed up on protocol here! Regards, Nick-D (talk) 04:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * No probs mate. I agree it's been a bit of an issue that just needs to be dealt with, hopefully this RfC will achieve that. BTW I'm fine with whatever amendments anyone wants to make to the proposals, they were just what I got out of the limited discussion above it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:46, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you for today's Yugoslav torpedo boat T5, "a dinky little torpedo boat that started its life in the Austro-Hungarian Navy and served for nearly 50 years under four different flags. She had a busy World War I in the Adriatic before being transferred to the fledgling Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia) after the war. She had a fairly uneventful interwar period, but once Yugoslavia was drawn into World War II with the Axis invasion of that country in April 1941 she was put back into service under the Italian flag. Handed back to the Royal Yugoslav Navy-in-exile when the Italians surrendered in 1943, she ended up serving in the post-war communist Yugoslav Navy until 1962."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gerda! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 21:16, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle newsletter
I just wanted to ask, is it a online newsletter, or a physical newsletter that’s gonna be mailed to my home? Cromwell (talk) 09:55, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
 * G'day, it is an online newsletter that is delivered to your talk page. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, I'm not sure what for, but it's good to be appreciated! Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Anton Schnack Article
Throughout countless lists of articles that I come across, does Anton Schnack article; B-class or Start-class? Adamdaley (talk) 08:35, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I would have assessed it a Start myself, but someone has assessed it as B. It still lacks citations and probably coverage as well. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:20, 26 October 2018 (UTC)