User talk:Peaceonearth20

September 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Gatestone Institute. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Grayfell (talk) 20:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Wikipedia is not a reliable source
That should be obvious. An article can be changed many times a day. No site that is crowd-sourced meets WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 20:27, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:00, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Gatestone Institute, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Amazon isn't a reliable source for biographies of living people other than their publications. '' Doug Weller  talk 19:33, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

AMIR TAHERI : Snooganssnoogans deleted Taheri's birth place (Iran) based on his personal opinion that this information is "unnecessary" and then you said the Amazon source is not reliable. They're both conflicting feedback. The information posted on Amazon is Taheri's profile that's printed in all of his 11 published books during the past 30 years by publishers who normally fact-checked authors background before printing their information in books. The information is correct and valid but if it's incorrect and Taheri was born elsewhere then the information can be modified with proper citation.


 * It belongs where it is, in his article. Biographical details don't belong in the Gatestone article, readers can click on his name to find them. You are getting two types of feedback which don't conflict. Doug Weller  talk 18:31, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

July 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Harold Arlen, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Graham 87 08:08, 7 July 2020 (UTC)