User talk:Peachypeach

"However, a differentiation should be made between spam articles and legitimate articles about commercial entities." ...your words.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Facialbuilding"

Facialbuilding

 * 1) A tag has been placed on Facialbuilding, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why Facialbuilding is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Facialbuilding. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. -WarthogDemon 04:03, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Please do not repeatedly post articles that promote products, services, or companies, as you did with Facialbuilding. It can be construed as vandalism.  If you would like help with contributing in a constructive manner, please see the welcome page.  Thank you. --NMChico24 04:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)