User talk:PeanutbutterjellyTaco/Archive 1

An invitation to the Teahouse... Please join us!

 * Hello, Rosiestep! Thanks for your warm welcoming. I'll be sure to look around Teahouse's lounge and ask some questions. Many Thanks! PeanutbutterjellyTaco (talk) 03:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Was reading your usename of "peanut butter jelly taco". have you tried that or just made it up? It doesnt sound very nice ;)Lihaas (talk) 07:32, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment, Lihaas! I would like to make it one day, but haven't tried it yet. I like both PBJ sandwich and taco. :) I've noticed you're editing 2012 South Korean election. Keep up the good work! PBJT (talk) 07:43, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

2008 election data
Thanks for enlightening me on matters to do with the Korean elections. Could you do one more thing for me? Can you locate the single-seat results by province - the equivalent of this page - for the 2008 election? This is the NEC's 2008 front page, so I assume the data is there somewhere. Many thanks. Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 04:11, 15 April 2012 (UTC)


 * You're welcome, Intelligent Mr Toad. My pleasure. :) Here are the results for SK 18th legislative election.


 * Local seats earned by each party
 * Seoul city voting figure 서울특별시 wiki Seoul
 * Busan city voting figure 부산광역시 wikiBusan
 * Daegu city voting figure 대구광역시 wiki Daegu
 * Incheon city voting figure 인천광역시 wiki Incheon
 * Gwangju city voting figure 광주광역시 wiki Gwangju
 * Daejeon city voting figure 대전광역시 wiki Daejeon
 * Ulsan city voting figure 울산광역시 wiki Ulsan
 * Gyeong-gi Province voting figure 경기도 wiki Gyeonggi-do
 * Gang-won Province voting figure 강원도 wiki Gangwon
 * North Chung-cheong Province 충청북도 wiki North Chungcheong Province
 * South Chung-cheong Province voting figure 충청남도 wiki South Chungcheong Province
 * North Jeolla Province voting figure 전라북도 wiki North Jeolla Province
 * South Jeolla Province voting figure 전라남도 wiki South Jeolla Province
 * North Gyeongsang Province voting figure 경상북도 wiki North Gyeongsang Province
 * South Kyungsang Province voting figure 경상남도 wiki North Gyeongsang Province
 * Jeju Island Provine voting figure 제주특별자치도 wiki Jeju Province


 * Block seats earned by each party
 * Total votes earned for Block seats by each party


 * Notice that the majority party before the election was DUP(or UDP at that time), and the main opposition was GNP(now Saenuri or NFP). So the first party is DUP, followed by GNP, LFP, and UPP(or DLP). PBJT (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Many thanks. You can see here what I am working on. Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 05:49, 15 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I was wondering why you're interested in those statistics, and now I know it. :) Do you own this web site? Let me know if you need any help with Korean texts. PBJT (talk) 08:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes that website is one of my many little hobbies. I have now put up provincial results for these elections. Next I will do some maps. I will do constituency-level results when I get time. That will require me learning some Hangul, but that looks very easy. Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 02:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC) (ㅏㄷㅏㅁ)

Jeolla
Perhaps you can tell me why 전라 is usually transcribed as Jeolla when it ought to be Jeonra? Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 07:36, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello Intelligent Mr Toad. Thanks for your message. :) Like English, Korean has its own phonetic rules. For example, when consonant "L" is followed by "ㄹ", "L" has sound value of "l", not "n". (please find this article: Korean phonology and table Phonetic realization of underlying consonant sequences in Korean)


 * In 전라, "L" is followed by "ㄹ", making "L" assimilated to "ㄹ". Thus, the word is pronounced as "Jeolla", not "Jeonra". PBJT (talk) 08:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have now uploaded complete constituency figures. I'm pretty sure these are not available in English anywhere else. Thank goodness for Google Translate! Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 11:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

South Korean politics working group
Since you've been editing South Korean politics-related articles I thought you might be interested in the working group I've set up. --Tyrannus Mundi (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your invitation, Tyrannus Mundi. I joined the working group. PBJT (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29
Hi. When you recently edited Anti-Korean sentiment in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major league (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Honam wing
Hi again -- While reading around for materials on the DUP primary contest, I came across this Hankyoreh article which mentions a "Honam wing" in the DUP. Since I haven't heard the phrase before I was just wondering if you might be able to clear up what the Honam wing is? --Tyrannus Mundi (talk) 02:40, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your detailed and insightful analysis -- a lot of these developments should eventually be included as part of the background in the presidential election article. I was vaguely aware that there was a dispute between a pro-Roh wing and their opponents, but your analysis makes things much clearer. Hardly anybody has written any comprehensive books on South Korean politics in English since 2002 so a lot of this is new to me! Tyrannus Mundi (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad my little knowledge have cleared things up. :) With the election race has begun, we will see interesting party dynamics and eventual coalition among oppositions, I guess. And many thanks for your continuous contributions to SK elections. Your contribution have made the article better, and I'm appreciate for your time and effort. PBJT (talk) 05:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Excuse me
I pressed the revert button by accident. Arcandam (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Thank you! --Tyrannus Mundi (talk) 12:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Please
At least I don't go around articles and deliberately delete other pro-USA conservatives' contributions. Are you sure that you support democracy? Komitsuki (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I left a message at Talk: South Korean legislative election, 2012. Please join. Thanks, --- PBJT (talk) 15:07, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

A question by Komitsuki
I have a personal question for you that bothers me a lot. I have a Korean heritage but I'm absolutely ashamed of my Korean heritage these days. I'm going to work in South Korea this year. Would this trigger any reaction from the peninsular public. Or maybe should I be comfortable of my Chinese pride (my other side)? Sorry for being a non-Wiki related question. Komitsuki (talk) 14:33, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello again, Komitsuki. And thanks for dropping by. I'm not clear what is your question exactly. If your question is about "Should you be proud of your Korean heritage?", then it's your choice whether you should be proud or shameful about your ethnicity. But if you ask me whether you should represent yourself as a Chinese, Filipino or Korean in Korea, it doesn't matter how you describe your ancestry: Koreans will see you as a foreigner. That doesn't necessarily mean that you will be discriminated in Korea, but rather it means that you wouldn't be a part of strong Korean "We-ness" (우리; Woo-ri). This "We-ness" can be a broad or narrow concept, such that even North Korean defectors are sometimes included or excluded. As an ice breaker, you can say that you're a half or quarter Korean. Introducing yourself as a Korean, however, wouldn't make you more favorable/unfavorable to other Koreans.


 * Depending on whom you meet, you might encounter a person with anti-American·Chinese·Japanese·North Korean sentiments. In addition, South Korea has a strong regionalism and a deep division between conservatives and liberal/progressive. Also, Korea can be a Xenophobic society (according to expat community in SK) compare to your own, but it is slowly changing and it even elected Philippine-born Jasmine B. Lee as the member of National Assembly. Even if you meet a person with a "fog in a well" mentality, don't take it seriously. So, welcome to the polarized and noisy country.


 * Last but not least, I hope you think why some Korean Wikipedians are object to your contributions. As for me, I would greatly appreciate your contributions if you could bring a neutral and in-depth perspective as an objective third party to the South Korean politics. Most of your contributions are related to SK politics, especially criticism against Lee Myung-bak and conservatives in general. Being a Chinese or Filipino doesn't make you automatically objective or neutral, when you're bringing/repeating SK liberal POV. Apart from offending other conservative users, bringing POV actually deteriorates the quality of Wikipedia. So, I ask you to follow the Wikipedia's rules. --- PBJT (talk) 00:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

On South Korea by Komitsuki
I'm not sure about this. I pretty much have a very negative impression of South Korea now. The media, society, environmental issues, and politics of this peninsular country make me freak out very much. And it's not just me who freaks out that seriously. I don't think Jasmine Lee could contribute a lot since she had described herself much closer to a hands-on activist than a politician. And don't forget that I know many Korea-born Koreans in my church and most of them would stay here permanently because their country right now is full of injustice from every part of the country according to them. I'm very worried these days. At least the Philippines doesn't have the McCarthy-like Cold War mindset of the past anymore. South Korea still has this public mindset that sets back the whole peninsula. South Korea is unforntuately a very backward country for some people. And I think this Cold War mindset blocks most of the social progress in South Korea because the country keeps looking for limited solutions from America. I think this is a main reason for some people to keep thinking South Korea an American colony. (Actually, the Philippines was an American colony in the past. But you know, there's this problem.) I feel unusually hopeless about my mother's birthplace. There's a huge number of suicides among youngsters, a counterproductive and over-stressed education scene, a very inefficient economic structure from chabol and a dying stock market from the Greek crisis, increased environmental destruction, and a very unhappy population. It just sounds very uncertain right now.

I don't have any bigger right in front of you because I'm not a Korean. I'm more offended with the attitudes from many Koreans in general. What I'm trying to say is the aggressive attitude and the lack of ability to achieve win-win situations among Koreans are very disturbing. I was closer of being exceptionally shocked from a group of contributors. So maybe I should stop contributing stuffs for South Korean politics. Others contributors already hate me now and will hate me forever. Maybe because of my possible antics? Because of a possibility that I'm a spy? So they will revert back any new contribution that I make. I did change a bit. I started to use English-language newspaper articles (perhaps a bit closer to neutral?) after few contributors thought I did a horrible job. But they didn't see it. I'm an evil contributor to every Korean contributor.

You might hate me so much. But it's ok. I deserve it. I absolutely deserve it. Komitsuki (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm really curious why you asked me the question in the first place, when you are not interested in my opinion? And what is your win-win situation and what should I do to be in your win-win situation?


 * Frankly, I don't know you well enough, Komitsuki. You might be a well-educated and intelligent person. But, keep in mind that we're communicating only with text and what you're saying doesn't sound mature. You seems to have a firm belief in South Korean politics and the United State's foreign policy. Even though I disagree with you on those issues, I respect your opinion and I have no intention of forcing my bias to you. If you have a negative opinion on South Korea, Korean people or its society, then it is entirely your choice and I'm perfectly fine with it. But if you don't hesitate to push your POV whenever you spot a chance, and that is a problem.


 * I hope you could continue to contribute to Wikipedia. As a friendly advice, however, please contribute on your other interest for a while: How about articles on your hometown and your country? How about Philippine's cuisine, culture or natural beauty? Politics(in any country) can be a heated issue: You'll always meet with someone who disagree with you, and you can be easily frustrated while you contribute the article based on your belief.


 * Thanks again for your comment, and enjoy the Philippine's beautiful scenery! Happy wiking. --- PBJT (talk) 04:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Removing Personal attack from User:Komitsuki
(Personal attack removed) Komitsuki (talk) 14:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't think this was a personal attack. Is it because I was being very honest about Korea and Koreans? I don't hate all Koreans. Is it because I offended you even though I never did anything wrong? I find out that you are a very reasonable and intelligent person. I find it rather strange and rather sad about this accusation. Komitsuki (talk) 15:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Your comments were removed not because of being honest of Korea or Koreans. For the reasons to remove your comments, please find Wikipedia's policy from WP:RPA and my comments below. A quote:
 * "Removing unquestionable personal attacks from your own user talk page is rarely a matter of concern."
 * --- PBJT (talk) 21:19, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

And for the Consequences of attacking other users repeatedly, please find a quote from the link below:
 * " Users who insist on a confrontational style marked by personal attacks are likely to become involved in the dispute resolution process, and may face serious consequences through arbitration. ... If a pattern of lesser personal attacks continues despite the warning, escalating blocks may follow."

You can always visit the link and read the whole paragraph by yourself (In case, you want to check whether I selectively presented one or two sentences to distort the whole meaning.) Thanks, --- PBJT (talk) 21:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Since you deleted my initial response in your talk page (which is fine, by the way.), I'm moving the comments here:
 * "" Removal of your comment: Hello Komitsuki. I just want to let you know that I have removed your comment in my talk page due to your false accusation. Please keep in mind that attacking other users won't help you win the argument. Furthermore, I want to remind you that repeated personal attacks could result in a restriction of your editing privilege. Thanks, --- PBJT (talk) 00:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC)""


 * --- PBJT (talk) 22:12, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Some of Komitsuki's comments
A quote from Komitsuki's previous comment on 22 May 2012:
 * "You reminded me of Koreans who get hired to post politically-leaned comments (댓글알바)."

I'm displaying Komitsuki's comment just for the record. This isn't the first time Komitsuki personally attacked me. Another quote from this contribution in an edit summary on 6 May 2012:
 * "This is censorship that you are doing. You call yourself democratic? I wonder."

There were numerous cases Komitsuki made offensive comments targeting on an individual or ethnic group:
 * Comments on Lee Myung-bak on 14 November 2010 at User talk:Benlisquare:
 * "By the way, I think Wikipedians need your brilliant skill to maintain a pissy (pissy because he's a notorious and controversial politician) article, Lee Myung-bak."


 * Another comments on Lee Myung-bak on 1 November 2010 User talk:Plu98:
 * "It's too bad that the South Korean president is a bigger threat to the world than the North Korean nukes."


 * South Korea's sovereignty on 19 May 2012 at my talk page:
 * "I think this is a main reason for some people to keep thinking South Korea an American colony."


 * Koreans in general without explaining what is a win-win situation according to his definition on 19 May 2012 at my talk page:
 * "What I'm trying to say is the aggressive attitude and the lack of ability to achieve win-win situations among Koreans are very disturbing."

--- PBJT (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Don't hold so much grudge about my past. I said it before. I can always change my own opinion when a single Korean individual can open up his honest heart to me. I'm not as evil as what you would've expected. Komitsuki (talk) 02:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't like this accusation
Did I say that you're a 댓글알바? No, I said that you reminded me of one in the past and this doesn't make you a 댓글알바 in the past and right now. And you all accuse of me making offensive comments. This is how the way I talk and express. It's not the best way but I didn't intend to insult anyone. And I told you before, I can always change my thoughts if someone opens up to me. Komitsuki (talk) 02:16, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

I wrote this without any offensive intention. "No matter what the odds are, I will try to think good of him." This is surely not about mocking one for sure. Is this comment an offensive attack? You didn't say why it was offensive. Komitsuki (talk) 02:20, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I noticed a subtle difference between "You are" and "You remind me of". Nevertheless, you statement implies similarities between "paid commentator" and me. Read the WP:NPA, and you will know your comment is a violation of WP:NPA. I also don't like this unconstructive discussion, and even don't know what is the topic now. As far as I'm concerned, however, the topic is clear: your pattern of disruptive, agenda-driven editing and uncivility must be changed.


 * I don't hold any grudge against you. As long as you change your behavior, I'm willing to cooperate with you in any articles. Violating WP:NPA once or twice won't be an issue, but do not expect that you can get away with it forever. Every contributions you made can be shown in Diff in Wikipedia. I hope your emotion don't get in the way of your reasoning, and please think twice before you leave a message. No, "  This is how the way I talk and express. " cannot be an excuse for uncivility. --- PBJT (talk) 05:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

You too are disturbing: your pattern of disruptive, agenda-driven editing and uncivility must be changed. And I don't complain. I hope you can stop "mirroring" me. I don't think bad of you at all and why should I be the bad guy? Why? I'm a lover, not a troublemaker. Komitsuki (talk) 05:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay, let us conclude the discussion now. I will stop criticizing your contributions, and hope you could keep away from South Korean politics articles for a while. Best, --- PBJT (talk) 05:43, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

If I happen to contribute something in South Korean politics, I will ask you beforehand and get a consent from you. Remember, conflicts of any kind don't have to be wars. In reality, conflicts are much closer to choreographic dance sequences in a ballet performance. By the way, I did occasionally supported Korean side when there was a dispute in the Wikipedia in the past. And I do admire pre-Korean War Korea. Komitsuki (talk) 13:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Another removed comment at Komitsuki's talk page
Re-posting of removed my response at Komitsuki's talk page:

''' No more personal attack. ''' Hello Komitsuki, and thanks for your comment. When I said "personal attack", I was referring to "hired to post politically-leaned comments (댓글알바)". I'm not hired by anybody to post comments, and accusing me as such is a personal attack. What you said has nothing to do with Korea or its people, and even if you said negative things about my ethnicity or nationality that wouldn't make me upset. A quote from WP:NPA: ""What is considered to be a personal attack? Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence. Evidence often takes the form of diffs and links presented on wiki. Sometimes evidence is kept private and made available to trusted users.""

And please stop posting comments in your user page when it looks clear (at least to me) that those comments are directed at me. I cannot help but to think those gestures are a kind of invitation to vandalize your user page, since this isn't the first time. Whatever is your game Komitsuki, I won't play it. --- PBJT (talk) 19:09, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

--- PBJT (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

What is considered to be a personal attack? Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. PBJT is also doing this thing, too. I don't want it and neither do you. I guess we are fighting for the same cause. Komitsuki (talk) 05:38, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * It's not a fight, but I wish you got my points. And if you don't mind, I "politely" ask you to remove your comments in your user page. --- PBJT (talk) 05:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Done! I already got your points. It's just that your way of presenting them could be very........ It is a good thing that I have an ability to see the pure hearts of individuals thanks to my 내공 (內功) of attending church for many years. And you happen to have a pure heart. So don't worry. You are a good man. A conflict (be it international, social, internal or personal) does not always have to be gruesome as the holy man in my church said to me. We can always be friends if we are so different from each other. Maybe these differences can encourage us to be the same thing or idea. Komitsuki (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Human rights in North Korea
Hello PBJT, thanks very much for the barnstar, this is a great honour for me! But in fact I care more for the North Korean people and especially those in the political prison camps, where hundreds of thousands of people have no freedom and exist in inhuman conditions. And I think they deserve that more people know and care about their fate. If you are interested in this subject and have some time, maybe you could consider to extend or improve a little the Korean Wikipedia articles (e. g. 조선민주주의인민공화국의 인권, 요덕 정치범수용소, 개천 정치범수용소, and so on)? -- Gamnamu (talk) 07:44, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I left a comment on your talk page. Thanks! --- PBJT (talk) 11:16, 25 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I replied to your comment on my talk page. Regards, Gamnamu (talk) 14:24, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: Welcome!
(•ิ_•ิ)ノ ★Many thanks for the welcome and information! KawaiiDDoS (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Please reply it
It is not emergency　[] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.65.37.217 (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC) Updated--115.65.37.217 (talk) 02:20, 2 June 2012 (UTC) Updated--115.65.37.217 (talk) 17:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

3O declined
Hey, PBJT, per your clarification, I've declined your request for a 3O, as it's a board for content issues only. (No big deal, this kind of confusion happens all the time.) That said, the IP user's edits were definitely not vandalism in the Wikipedia sense of the term. The IP appears to be editing based on what he thinks the correct interpretation of the source is; as such, he appears to be editing in good faith and is therefore not vandalizing. Edits that are believed by the editor to be correct and constructive are never vandalism, even if the edits are, in fact, incorrect. Not even the edit-warring aspect makes them vandalism. They might be inappropriate and disruptive, but if the editor doesn't intend them to be inappropriate and disruptive, it's not vandalism. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 20:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Do not ask this specific board with issues with another editor. WP:30 does not deal with incivilty. Try another forum. Do not post on 30 for incivility issues again or it will constitute disruption.Curb Chain (talk) 02:38, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Just to supplement what Curb Chain has said, most content dispute resolution processes, such as 3O, WP:DRN, WP:RFC, WP:MEDCAB, and WP:MEDCOM, will not accept disputes dealing with user conduct, such as incivility. Conduct issues should go to WP:WQA, WP:RFC/U, WP:ANI, or WP:ARBCOM. Regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 13:36, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

So regarding your comment on my talk page, if the "ip" is being uncivil to you, you can take it up at an appropriate forum as written by TransporterMan above, or you can ignore what he says, and focus on the content and the rebut his arguments on content; he can cast irrelevant accusations weather true or not, but if he is going offtopic, this it wouldn't be an argument for his position of the version of the article, would it?Curb Chain (talk) 21:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism is clearly vandalism. You cannot categorize an editor's edits as vandalism if he is falsifying information, misinterpreting information, etc. You can raise the issue at other fora, but 30 is not the forum.Curb Chain (talk) 22:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Mabeenot (talk) 04:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Shin Dong-hyuk (human rights activist)
In case you're interested in following this situation, letting you know since you had posted, thanks. Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. Green Cardamom (talk) 20:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * You're name has also been added to his "watchlist" User:M0rphzone/Watched pages, apparently some sort of personal stalking for anyone that disagrees with him/her. Green Cardamom (talk) 20:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Just to let you know, PBJT already commented about Korean wave, so I added him to the watchlist to keep track of his comments, since the Special:Watchlist has too many pages. If you continue to bring up the issue, I am considering it harassment. Sorry PBJT for bringing a personal conflict to your talk page. - M0rphzone (talk) 21:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks M0rphzone for your nice comment! I didn't side with anyone at Talk:Shin Dong-hyuk, and just thought that an third opinion would help the discussion mover forward.
 * I was interested in that article since I translated it to another language, and found the discussion is going nowhere. (please note that I'm not criticizing anyone, but really sorry if I was sounded like that.)
 * Hope we could resolve the dispute by talks, and focus on the topic. Many thanks to you both Greedn Cardamom and M0rphzone for your comments. Best Reards, --PBJT (talk) 21:55, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That's what I was trying to say. It was going nowhere because Green kept bringing up the issues I was already trying to resolve, and then he continues to harass me about my actions. Those comments left on that article should have been on my talk page anyways, or his. I don't want this to turn into some incident, but it seems that Green really wants to show that he "won" some argument. If he wants to talk about my actions/comments, he should be replying on my talk page, not anywhere else. - M0rphzone (talk) 22:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Didn't see that barnstar coming
Thanks. I was in Malaysia for weeks to see my relatives. Komitsuki (talk) 14:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Lee Myung-bak merge
PBJT, I'm not sure why you posted at Proposed mergers. It sounds like you have consensus to do this. What's the problem? D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  01:56, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Dondegroovily, and thanks for your comment. I also believe that a consensus was reached, but the problem is I don't know how to merge an article except copy&paste way. If that is acceptable, then I'll do it manually by myself. Sorry to bother you with my trivial issue, but I assumed that asking for a merge to admins is the proper way of doing it. Many thanks! --PBJT (talk) 02:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

No need for admins, and copy/paste is the way.
 * 1) Copy the content you want to copy
 * 2) Erase the contents of the Public Image page and replace with #REDIRECT Lee Myung-bak
 * 3) At Talk:Lee Myung-bak, add  to the top of the page
 * 4) At Talk:Public image of Lee Myung-bak, add  to the top of the page

Thats all. Thanks, D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  02:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for your help, Dondegroovily! I just merged the articles as you explained, and it's good to know new skills. Again, thanks! --PBJT (talk) 00:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I hope you're ok
Some of the Korean parish members I know are saying that South Korea is economically and politically insecure right now and it would possibly be worse. And I'm hearing many bad things about South Korea's economy, South Korea's human rights issues, and the conservative South Korean politicians like Lee Myung-bak and Park Guen-hye among non-Koreans. I hope you're ok because I think you need my prayers. I know South Korea is a very difficult country to live in. You are a strong man. Be strong. This too shall pass. Komitsuki (talk) 15:44, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Infobox Korean Film
I saw your ID on WikiProject and so I thought you might be interested in a debate at Template Talk on the topic of merging Infobox Korean Film into the generic Infobox Film category, deleting the Hangul/hanja/RR/MR information, or keeping it separate (as it currently is). I would appreciate it if you to contribute your thoughts or at least glance over it. The more people looking/thinking about it will give us better ideas as to what should be decided. Thank you. ₪Rick n Asia₪ 09:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)