User talk:Peanuts9565

Welcome!
Hello, Peanuts9565, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Original research and neutrality
I noticed you edited a few animated films. These often need work, and I thank you for taking the time to try to improve them. However, some of your edits were problematic. Please don't add your own opinions and interpretations to Wikipedia articles. This would include labeling stuff as "a financial success" merely because a film grossed more than its budget. Studios don't take in all the money that a film grosses; much of it goes to the cinemas, and percentages of the gross often go to actors. Even when it's obvious, such as when a film grosses 10x its budget, Wikipedia's policies of using neutral language and avoiding original research, prevent us from labeling stuff as "a success". Let the trade magazines do that; we just report the flat numbers, such as a gross of $150 million. Reception sections are similar; we shouldn't label whether something was a "critical success" through out own interpretation of the reviews. We already have two review aggregators that we use to gauge reception, Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic. We don't need editors to add their own interpretation on top of that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Kung Fu Panda 3. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Original research
Please stop adding your own opinions to film articles. You can't declare something was a financial success or that it received critical acclaim. Instead, simply report the gross, like "it grossed $20 million in the US". Wikipedia does not label whether something was a success or not. Plus, merely grossing more than its budget is not enough for a studio to break even on a film. Part of the gross goes to cinemas, for example. Please, just report the numbers and leave the editorializing for reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:32, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please use the WP:SANDBOX  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 02:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding your own personal interpretation of whether something was a "success" or not. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)