User talk:Pebbles

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ilaria Capua (December 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ilaria Capua and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Onel 5969  TT me 18:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ilaria Capua has been accepted
 Ilaria Capua, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  18:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

I hope to add to this page
Hello -- My name is Tom Nordlie, I'm a public-relations writer with the University of Florida's agriculture program. This is my first Wikipedia editing experience, please forgive me if I seem ignorant.

I've been asked to expand the current Wikipedia article on Dr. Ilaria Capua, who is a faculty member here at UF.

In a nutshell, I have already prepared a lengthy biography of Dr. Capua, which was written to conform to Wikipedia standards. I plan to input the material and citations over the course of several days, beginning later this week.

Having no prior experience, I don't know if there's a standard way to proceed, but I read somewhere that it's good etiquette to notify the "founding editor" before altering a page they posted originally. So, please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Also, here's a message for anyone else who may read this -- In case the question arises, I'm a full-time, permanent employee of the University of Florida. I am paid an annual salary for writing various promotional items for the UF agriculture program. I am not an independent contractor or temp, and I'm not being paid any sort of bonus for editing this Wikipedia page. I've been involved in this kind of work 15+ years, and I am very mindful of the need to always "write to the task" and produce the sort of material an assignment requires -- in this case, thoroughly cited, fact-focused, neutral POV material. I hope that I am considered sufficiently neutral to proceed. If not, please let me know ASAP.

Thanks,

Tom

Tom Nordlie (talk) 15:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Small Moral Works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Porphyry ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Small_Moral_Works check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Small_Moral_Works?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)