User talk:Ped Admi

Welcome

 * Welcome to Ped Admi's talk page.
 * Please see the notice below and where to place your comment — here or on another talk page.
 * [/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ped_Admi&action=edit&section=new  Please click here to leave me a new message.]

Your place or mine?
I generally prefer unfragmented discussions. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page — my talk page — as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. Similarly, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there.

At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Cite it or delete it
The threshold for inclusion of any information in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiable" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed.

Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's core content policies. The others include No original research and Neutral point of view. Jointly, these policies determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in Wikipedia articles. They should not be interpreted in isolation from one another, and editors should try to familiarize themselves with all three.

Cite it or delete it. Period.

Ped Admi

Please vote!
Hi! Please join us here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lianga13#Bingo.21

Thank so much!

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 12:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Miss Universe
Hi, thanks for your message on my talk page... just so you know (and I think Angelo flagged it)... an anon ip added it, not me ;) In fact, I thought I'd deleted it!  Maybe it got lost because I was reverting a couple of versions?  PageantUpdater  talk • contribs  07:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Kris Joseph
I think the article as it stood previously did not have the references or the third party sources for an AFD nomination. But I've added a little more bulk to it. GoCuse44 (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

response
I'd actually just merge them all into the main article - quicker than AFD - if people object, then AFD is the way to go... --Cameron Scott (talk) 17:16, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

AFD
Hi - it's no problem - if the parent articles are deleted, the sub-articles can be speedy deleted... --Cameron Scott (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)