User talk:PediaIG

July 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Bluvision, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - MrX 15:52, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

________________________________________________________

MrX: Thank you for the update. I apologize for deleting the tags, but thought that's what should have been done after providing the reasoning behind it. As noted, Bluvision is one of the organizations behind the recently announced Eddystone platform by Google. This platform allows developers to focus on customer interactions with Bluetooth beacons to support the Internet of Things -- with or without a mobile application. As one of the architecture contributors to this open source platform that is highlighted in the Eddystone Wikipedia entry, we thought it would be important for users researching this topic to learn about Bluvision as well. In fact, we put the basics in this entry and focused only on Eddystone -- not any other products, services or efforts by the company -- where others are focused primarily on their company details (like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kontakt.io). We would therefore respectfully request that the page be reinstated and we'd welcome any suggestions to make sure that it adheres to the Wikipedia guidelines. We have also identified additional references to cite based on yesterday's announcement and the coverage by various tech editorial destinations. Thank you.

PediaIG (talk) 19:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem on deleting the tag. Bluvision would not be an eligible subject for an article until there is a significant amount of coverage in reliable, independent sources. The sources have to primarily discuss the subject, as opposed to merely mentioning it. Also, press releases and press resulting from press releases are not useable for obvious reasons.- MrX 19:46, 15 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Surprising, since the company was a major contributor to this platform. With that said, what is so different about the other highlighted company in the Eddystone entry (Kontakt.io) from the Bluvision one? We're trying to learn from the experience and that one is certainly more promotional ... so it's a bit confusing. Thank you again.

PediaIG (talk) 19:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

PediaIG, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure