User talk:PediaWikiMaster

Sockpuppet investigation
Keri (talk) 08:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your apology of an unwarranted accusation will be appreciated. Leniency is shown to those acknowledge their mistake and take ownership of it. PediaWikiMaster (talk) 16:04, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution
You had the opportunity to comment at the DRN. The moderator - and I'm in agreement with them - said that your interpretation of the memo is WP:FRINGE. Waiting until the DRN is closed and then reverting the article back to your preferred state appears disruptive and tendentious. Keri (talk) 10:32, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

I also have a life and am not waiting on your every move to "comment." The moderator and yourself are missing the point altogether. My comments did not have anything to do with my interpretation of the memo. I simply commented that Rohan presented factual quotes and evidence in his posts and that his edit should be allowed. Suggesting that Rohan's words added a more balanced view of both sides does not require my interpretation of the memo. If both you and the moderator are focused on my interpretation of the memo, it's no wonder we are confused. I didn't give my interpretation of the memo. If your decision was based on my interpretation of the memo, then for multiple reasons, again, the edit and your decision is wrong.

PediaWikiMaster (talk) 13:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24h for edit-warring--Ymblanter (talk) 14:51, 22 May 2016 (UTC). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.


 * For clarification to the administrator considering an unblock, the article is under 1RR restriction. The user has been alerted about DS at their talk page above.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2016 (UTC)